6th May 2006, 12:46
| #16 |
| BHPian  | |
|
| |
|
6th May 2006, 23:04
| #17 |
| BHPian  Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: mumbai
Posts: 83
Thanked: 56 Times
| |
|
|
|
1st June 2006, 19:03
| #18 |
| Senior - BHPian  Join Date: May 2006 Location: Greater Chennai
Posts: 4,667
Thanked: 559 Times
| |
|
|
|
2nd June 2006, 11:35
| #19 |
| BHPian  Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 389
Thanked: 12 Times
| Correct me if i'm wrong but I think the combination of a supercharger and a turbo charger is called a superturbo(?) And headers, the supercharger is basically used to overcome that annoying turbo lag, i.e., the period until the turbo has sufficiently spooled-up. Unless I have misinterpreted your question and what you are really asking is about the workings of superchargers and turbochargers. If yes, there is already a thread existing on this topic, so use our forum's infamous search option!  Godspeed. Alok. Last edited by ghostrider4385 : 2nd June 2006 at 11:46. |
|
|
|
2nd June 2006, 14:53
| #20 | |
| Senior - BHPian  | Quote:
However, the latest update on this is that VW has made a 1.4 liter engine which is both Super & Turbo charged. And I quote from a recent article in EVO magazine: "A turbocharged engine is an obvious way to go, except that without resorting to clever technology - linked twin turbos, or variable geometry, which remains beyond the reach (in a petrol engine) of anything less than the new Porsche 911 Turbo - the driveability is going to suffer, especially at the bottom end. Volkswagen's answer is to use an engine-driven Roots-type blower to supercharge the input to the turbo. The supercharger output is varied, via a blow-off valve, so its maximum boost can be applied from very low engine speeds without blowing the whole thing apart at 6000rpm. In effect, the supercharger is filling in the lower parts of the desired torque curve that the unassisted turbo could not reach. From around 4000rpm, the turbo - well into its stride - does it all. The thing is, why has Volkswagen done it? The answer is efficiency. This is a classic downsizing exercise and it pays the classic downsizing bonus: economy. The Golf GT comes with an official fuel consumption of 38.2mpg, while the equivalent VR5-engined car used to deliver 31.7mpg. If you were simply to drive the car without being told what was under the bonnet, you might guess at a particularly good 16-valve 2-litre. But it isn't; it's a 1.4." You can find the full article here : http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/driven/...n_golf_gt.html Only interest for me is that if they could do the same to the 2.0 GTi engine or the 3.2 R32 engine!! Imagine the 3.2 producing around 380-400 bhp instead of the usual 247 bhp and still being light and fuel efficient!! Now wouldn't that be a motor worth having! Last edited by iraghava : 2nd June 2006 at 14:55. | |
|
|
and it will be super fast ? Are you sure what you are talking about? Do you know how complex it is to run a supercharger and a turbo together ? Last time I saw a supercharger and a turbocharger running in a engine was in a Group B rally car by Lancia..I hope you know what Group B rally cars were.. |
2nd June 2006, 16:37
| #21 |
| BHPian  Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Dilli
Posts: 104
Thanked: 2 Times
| |
|
|
|
2nd June 2006, 17:36
| #22 |
| BHPian  Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 289
Thanked: Once
| |
|
|
|
4th June 2006, 08:20
| #23 |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: May 2006 Location: Greater Chennai
Posts: 4,667
Thanked: 559 Times
| |
|
|
|
6th June 2006, 19:03
| #24 |
| BHPian Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: mumbai
Posts: 83
Thanked: 56 Times
| |
|
|
|
6th June 2006, 21:11
| #25 |
| BHPian  Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: mumbai
Posts: 55
Thanked: 0 Times
| |
|
|
|
6th June 2006, 21:18
| #26 |
| BHPian Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: mumbai
Posts: 83
Thanked: 56 Times
| |
|
|
| |
|
6th June 2006, 21:18
| #27 |
| BANNED  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,773
Thanked: 19 Times
| |
|
|
|
7th June 2006, 10:45
| #28 |
| BHPian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: mumbai
Posts: 55
Thanked: 0 Times
| |
|
|
 |