Re: KTM RC 390 vs Kawasaki Ninja 300 Quote:
Originally Posted by akp666 Corner craving monster like the duke is not something I am looking for. Something relaxed for touring and some city jaunts is my requirement, hence KTM's have been ruled out. Any bullet is a no-no as I want something niggle free (not saying all bullets are problematic, no disrespect to other bullet owners). Also street 750 was eliminated because of the poor quality. Additionally i am not looking for any poser value in my bike. It all is boiling down to Vitamin M & me considering myself a newbie, as I have not ridden for years. Should I stick with a smaller Ninja 300 or pay the same amount for a pre-worshiped Ninja 650? Ridden both bikes (my friend's) back to back extensively and it is confusing the hell out of me. I am connecting with both, and surely the extra HP on the 650 makes me yearn for it, but 300 seems more practical. |
I would suggest go for a N300 or a R3 if -
1. You use it in city as a everyday bike. These are better for commuting than a N650.
2. Upkeep costs matter. R3 is significantly cheaper to maintain than a N650. Spares availability and relative resale values could be better too.
3. Fuel efficiency matters. Fun vs fuel efficiency factor of a N300 is better than a N650. These 300s are no slouchs, these can easily do 0-100 in 5.5s and top 190, which is more than sufficient for Indian Cities and Highways. Touring ability and comfort of the 300s are great too.
4. Ride quality and handling, ground clearance of both the 300s match/optimized for what our Indian conditions offer.
Since you have not ridden in a long time, I would suggest go for the smaller bike. You will "utilize" it more is my opinion.
I remember reading this which might make sense in this case wrt 300 and 650 - Its always fun to ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slow. |