Originally Posted by Proxima
(Post 726254)
I hate TVS. and HH. If Bajaj did not launch the Pulsar and Discover, we would still have CD Dawn+++s and Super Duper Splendors selling for 45k and 60k respectively. Take the XCD for an example. It has more features than TVS's and HH's 150cc bikes and is still priced on par with their 125 ccs (if not below) Bajaj started: Alloy wheels for the masses. Disc brakes for the masses. Self start, LED tail lamps, digital speedos for the masses. What about the spring in spring technology that it offers in the ultra-cheap platina? All other bike manufacturers in India are playing catchup. |
Originally Posted by straight6
(Post 725563)
I hate Bajaj. Mainly because I hate that Rahul Bajaj :mad:. He's the one who made sure that you can't import the big bikes earlier then later he made sure that you cant import anything under 800 cc. He's got a big hand in all these stupid rules. |
Originally Posted by BaCkSeAtDrIVeR
(Post 726179)
And patents are subject to nullification by the courts. Even when you get a patent, if the court finds that it should not have been granted, the court will strike it down. This has a flip side - seen now - anybody with a good patent lawyer can obtain a bogus, non-inventive patent (like the Amazon double click patent, which is now nullified, AFAIK) and then indulge in anti-competitive practises. Companies like Microsoft are now doing this in the software world; and worst part of the tactics is that Microsoft is not even divulging what patents they are claiming. |
The time is 20 years now. And given that double sparks technology is already patented, what is so innovative about using that on < 250 CC engines? And what is the sanctity of this 250CC? (I have no clue how/why this 250 CC threshold exists). Miniaturisation is not patentable, it is just design innovation, and design innovation is protected by a different law. Somebody else can easily arrive at a different method of such miniaturisation. |
In what way? The costs our courts award are peanuts!!! And there is no penalty for false allegations. Bajaj can easily establish a hegemony on the whole market by the time the court case is over. And remember that unlike the US, where "Long drawn patent litigation" means a case which reaches its end in 3 years, a "quickly decided" litigaion in India takes mere 3 decades. :Frustrati |
Originally Posted by bikeguru
(Post 725725)
its like same as the honda vtech technology invented by honda thats why only honda can use v tech engines in cars . its just mine thinking for bajaj |
Originally Posted by Jr Godzilla
(Post 726427)
thats excellent from Rahul Bajaj. he has given a means of earning for the many thousands than have a few bikers with more cubic inches freaking around!!haha |
Originally Posted by esteem_lover
(Post 726633)
How about patenting the slant & kick technology that we used for ages in our bajaj scooters ? :uncontrol |
Originally Posted by rider60
(Post 733497)
checkout this link, this bike of honda launched in 1960s has two spark plugs! now does this mean the honda can sue the bajaj or it doent apply as its way too old? the photo graphs are in the first page, did not know how to post a single post i am leaving the thread's link here! http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/motorb...tml#post727066 |
Originally Posted by gendarmee
(Post 733608)
As you will read in the thread there it's a single carb, twin cylinder engine, hence 2 spark plugs one for each cylinder. More over, it seems like Bajaj are mis-using indian patents, even if there is a 40's bike which has 2 plugs, who cares, Bajaj would claim it did it first in india. 3 spark plug would quite a comcept for a street bike! |
Originally Posted by rider60
(Post 733633)
pardom me for this only saw the two spark plugs!:) |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 23:38. |