Guys, Guys Chill for a sec. First, the question asked if the unicorn will overhaul the pulsar is a completely wrong question to ask. We know that the pulsar comes in the 150 cc and the 180 cc variants. The unicorn is only 150cc.
Lets compare oranges to oranges shall we!
Pulsar = Pulsar 150 unless stated otherwise
The Honda Unicorn, one of the most anticipated bikes to be launced in the Indian market was met with a declining smile when realeased. We think of Honda and we think of this magnificient company making some of the most powerful, reliable and attarctive bikes in the world and our expectations from this manufacturer though sub conciously was well beyond reality. Thus ended the hype behind the launch of the unicorn. But did they really put a dud of a bike in our market, ofcourse not. It was and is still up there with the best of them in the segment.
The bajaj pulsar, expectations for this company to come out with a blockbuster bike that would blow people away was limited. Then the pulsar happened and people were more than happy to go for the pulsar which everyone believed rightfully so, to be the best bike. Remember ads are a hamstring to customer sovernity. and hey! that was the only bike available that was not your standard commuter styled bike.
Lets break it down shall we :-
The monoshock : The first of its kind in India. Is it better than the dual shocks? Yes, if not why would they use it on all crotch rockets? With dual shock absorbers you are likely to have different damping ratios for the shocks. In the case of a monoshock the damping is even. Difference between the dual and the monoshock = Marginal, when it comes to a bike lesser than 150 kilos.
Mileage : Honda had to break with a realistic understanding that mileage is dependent on the way the bikes is ridden and mention an estimated fuel efficiency figure for our public. They stated 60kmpl. Does the unicorn return that much? Ofcourse not. Which bike does gives mileage stated by the company?
Pulsar, They first started out with an estimated 77kmpl. which was far far lesser than the actual figures.
Torque : The unicorn makes its maximum torque and maximum power at a much lower rpm than the pulsar and the unicorn engine does come up trumps with more torque. Low end torque is much better than the pulsar 150's
Looks : The pulsar comes up with max point in this category. With its muscular looks it won over a lot of people. The unicorn with its commuter styling and lame a** stickering could not keep up with the pulsar.
Rider comfort : The pulsar almost has a sports bike rider stance on the bike. The unicorn is more straight forward and stuck with the comfortable upright seating position. It is upto the consumer to make a decision in this category. The Unicorn with its smoothness and almost silent engine make for a more pleasant ride, but the pulsar does give the rider a feel that he is riding a "powerful" bike. Again, customer preference.
In Traffic : The unicorn with its 1340 mm wheelbase is not as flickable in traffic as the pulsar with the 1330 mm wheelbase. The turning radius in both bikes have not impressed much.
Service : Dudes, please what do you expect? go down to the nearest village and ask for a service centre? You've got plenty in the city, let the guys who reside in remote locations worry about the amount of service centres. It does not take long to befriend a guy in the service centre and have him service your bike. Its these little things that you do that helps. Don't expect to just hand it over to a bloke at the service centre and expect him to give personal attention to your bike. Make him.
All in all I weighed the options and went in for a unicorn 'cos I like more go than show. Show can be helped with the least effort.
Why do pulsars still run then you ask!
When you state a compelling argument to a friend who is in the market for a bike and show him that the Unicorn is better and he still turns around and books a Pulsar, you will know why pulsars are still rampant in the market.
Besides, there is little choice when it comes to the 180 pulsar. the only other upgrades are the karizma and comet or the bullet (Expensive)
My opinion will always side the CBF 150 that I own and ride. I am a forgiving person and can forgive bajaj to put out a bike in the market and then add "enhancement" to it to correct the mistakes or tie up to loose ends that were left when the bike was first released but I do get ticked with the Jimmicks that they put out with the so called DTSI and EXHAUSTEC and SNS.
Hey! Revvtec, the mileage figures stated by the consumers were published in overdrive the anniversary edition. Will post the figures when I find it. It should be lying at home somewhere.
Peace
DNR --- TCR
Last edited by TheCockroach : 14th February 2006 at 05:00.
|