Re: Honda Jazz : Official Review Quote:
Originally Posted by GKMahajan Dear Vivek-Bharathy,
I keep 32 and 30 psi as mentioned. Nobody has complained about the bouncy rear. But, maybe, I have not asked specifically!
Girish Mahajan |
Dear Girish,
I have JAZZ SV IDTEC and so far clocked close to 13k kms. I still ride on my stock MRF tyres. I initially had 33psi on all tyres(per recommendation from my friendly SA) but I felt the ride was on the stiffer side(when we drive through patched roads in low speed 30-40kmph.I tried all 32 and felt the ride was absorbent on the same patched road stretch at low speed referred above. These days I have 33psi at front and 30psi at the back (as suggested) and I see difference in ride quality during low speeds. I second your view in following the recommended tyre pressure. Its even more absorbent and soft with this psi setup. But I believe there is room for further improvement.It would have been even more better had Honda provided 195ers rather 175s.
There is a reason for specifically mentioning the ride quality at low speeds because the ride quality with different tyre pressure is mostly felt during low speeds(mostly city drives) but in highways at speeds over 70kmph the undulations due to badly patched road are mostly ignorable or not notable. Thanks to the slightly stiffer(sporty) setup of our Jazz's suspension which has very well helped in keeping the car stable(not springy as seen in competitors) in corners especially. Sharp pot holes always has a bad effect to any car and Jazz is no exception that too with 175ers. Quote:
Originally Posted by TD_GHY I don't know if it has to do with my and my father's driving style, but we feel the Jazz is a better highway car than a city car. Due to the very low low-end torque, it takes time to get going from standstill in city traffic. While others like Altos, Indicas, i20s zoom past you in traffic, the Jazz takes its own sweet time to catch up. Also need frequent gear shifts in city. While in highways, the car rides like an aeroplane (on good roads). No vibrations, no swinging right and left. Just slot it in 5th and have a relaxing drive. We haven't pushed it beyond 100kmph and so don't really know if the Jazz will be less confidence inspiring at higher speeds. |
Dear TD_GHY, During my initial days(while I was studying/experimenting my Jazz's behaviour) I was a very conservative driver(hesitant to push the car to close-in the gaps in city or to catch-up with the cars ahead of us in Bumper to Bumper traffic worried about FE and trying not to rev to high RPMs during run-in period).I mostly tried to keep the GREEN ambient light ring glowing with FE BAR mostly near 25kmpl mark. Due to this practise, my drive was mostly sedate and The FE was very good at approx. 19kmpl with 5ppl on board(mostly) + 100% AC in B2B traffic conditions. Since FE experimentation was always on, I religiously upshifted to higher gears at low acceptable speeds. But the after effect of this early upshift was low acceleration but better FE. After the 3rd service was over, I came off the shell. I learnt few tricks to get the best out of the Jazz in terms of acceleration in city traffic conditions. These days I close-in the gaps + run out of the following crowd with my effective 3rd and 4th gear(s).I am not looking at the ambient rings anymore but at the FE bar. Even now, I try to be mostly at the 25kmpl mark but its at times impossible to maintain the same while we are pushing hard at an over-bridge or during a 100m dash.
At the highways I always try not to push her hard. I have reached 130 on few occasions but mostly prefer driving at 100-120 mark (FE approx 21 to 22kmpl).When driven between 90 to 100 the FE was approx 25+Kmpl ignoring looking the ambient green rings but keeping an eye on the FE Bar(around 25kmpl).During my recent highway trip of approx 1500kms Jazz returned FE of 23.9KMPL this includes 100+ kms of City/Town/Village roads. Some pics as below
Jazz's Overall KM
Jazz's Avg FE figure for the past 4k kms
My UT 'Transformer'
So I am not sure whether the ambient rings and FE bars were psychologically stopping us from pushing our car in lower gears(as was in my case during my early days) making us feel that this car is sedate.  I understand that there is a world of difference between the 1.2 IVTEC,1.5 IVTEC(CITY & BRV) and 1.5 IDTEC but would like to hear from our petrol head friends as well. Quote:
Originally Posted by varunswnt ..I have manual and I can vouch for that. 80-100 kmph is Jazz's sweet spot, good ride and economy is guaranteed in this band.
On a lighter note, Jazz has made me a sedate and more economical driver.   |
I agree with you on this mate. The best FE figures I have got out of Jazz is only because of the way its designed to guide drivers to tap its sweet spot(turbo range in my IDTEC) 1650 to 2200 RPM (Torquey and Efficient) |