Quote:
Originally Posted by ecosport rules The wing bar edge looks fantastic
Please do share some more pictures (up close)
Is it half black half silver colour?
What was the model.of mounting kit used? |
Thank you. Here are a some close up pics. I think the bar itself may be same for 9595 and 961, just the length is different. The bar is silver color but the it has a black rubber piece running along the length, at the top for providing a friction surface for mounting any boxes. The mounting kit is 4070, as Endeavour has raised roof rails.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCORPION Thanks for the info on the roof rails. I am fairly new to the cross bar thing. Can you please educate me on how the cross bars work? I mean, how do you use them to carry luggage, do you need a roof box or can you fix regular steel/aluminium carriers on to them?
The reason I don't want to keep them on is the height restrictions in my basement parking and also, I think, it will create some unwanted wind noise. |
I drive around with mine to all malls and have not had any issue. 74” is like 6’2”, about a tall guy’s height. Measuring the basement clearance would help you. Wind noise should not be an issue. I think you are being overly cautious. I have a large Thule Dynamic 800 box mounted on the bars (max payload 75 kgs, 86" height). See picture. At around 90 kmph onward the box does generate some wind noise but not significant. The bar by itself does not create any wind noise at all. It has a nice aero shape. Also the noise insulation is damn good in this car. The more I drive this vehicle, the more I feel this is an absolute steal for the price. Good that I am away on business, else I would be sleeping in it !
Just having the bar alone does not help. You would need a luggage carrier. In my case, the luggage carrier is the box. Else you would need a platform and tie down any luggage. See picture below. The box set me back Rs 85k, but then it is much quieter, protects from rain and dust, no worries of luggage ejecting on a highway, no worries of it moving around, lastly does not kill performance or mileage. Yes, this is an expensive jack-fruit carrier, but this is what happens when an engineer goes crazy !
Depending on the vehicles roof rails, you need different attachment kits. See pic below.
Quote:
I tried to do some research on the transmission cooler and what I could gather is that since the Endeavour is rated to tow upto 3 tons on all terrains, the cooler should be able to cope with the additional loads.
However, during my search for the transmission cooler details, I came across some fresh concerns on fitting a tuning box on the Ford Puma series engines. I am lead to believe they use Piezoelectric injectors that are very sensitive to the injection timing in relation to the rail pressure and tuning boxes can damage the injectors unless the timing is also altered along with the rail pressure.
|
On the ECU mod, please refer to one of my earlier post in a different thread. It should give an idea.
http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/techni...ml#post4174049
Inside the cylinder, the ECU controls only the amount of fuel and the injection angle (a.k.a Advance Angle, AA). By controlling AA it can indirectly control turbo speed and hence boost pressure. It becomes a bit more complicated to explain if the engine has VVT. For the most part VVT is engine rpm based, with whole lot of sensors giving adjustments on top of rpm.
You should be ok for 20% torque increase. Anything beyond you would need a more thorough understanding of the full system, including impact on after-treatment devices, heat exchangers, injectors, fuel pump. Fuel injector change out interval might also get reduced. But then the greatest benefit shows up mainly in improved acceleration. Rarely does engine reach peak HP but it does reach peak torque more often as it comes earlier in the rpm range. If it is automatic transmission, then chances of reaching peak torque reduces a bit, to minimize the jerk experienced during gear shifts. TCU handles this part. ECU mods shifts the torque curve to the ‘left’, that is, deliver same torque earlier in the rpm range. Or in other words the engine anyway is seeing this torque, just that with mods it sees it earlier. The main issue is with peak torque. If the mods jack up the peak torque, then you are stressing a lot of engine components. But as I said, upto 20% increase should be ok. Some of the mods guys get a bit adventurous. There are folks, with changes to turbo, intercooler etc, who have doubled the torque in other cars. Insanity! for commoners like me.
I talked to a guy in Pete’s tuning, recently. It appears these guys are very knowledgeable in what they do. Warranty may not be affected. What these guys do is they mask the software update check box in the ECU program, so it does not show up as a new s/w. SA mostly plugs in diagnostics tool to the OBD port. It does not tell you any s/w mods, but only communicates the diagnostic informations such as sensor status, fluid temperatures, electrical status etc. There is no way to know any s/w mods through OBD. You need a full fledged dyno test or a bigger set of data loggers to know if the map has been modified. If it is an external tuning box, that can be easily detached, then there is no way to know, assuming you detach it before service.
Although, I have a priliminary interest from a purely mileage standpoint, I am not convinced yet I need a tuning box for the Endeavour 3.2. I need some more study. Recently I had this Etios driver (sole occupant) try to cut me off in a ‘very’ dangerous way. I had the roof box full and a total of about 70 kg luggage plus 5 passengers. This Endy beat that Etios to pulp in sheer acceleration. 470 monsters at full flow will beat most anything on the road today. Why bring in 550 then, unless it is for mileage