![]() |
Originally Posted by reignofchaos
(Post 4299872)
It is still available in 2018 garb with lots of carbon fiber parts that reduce weight from the previous year and increase downforce. |
Originally Posted by AMG Power
(Post 4299853)
That's because they didn't fully test the 530D and so have used the figures off the website. See attached pic where ACI mentions that the 0-100 times are as claimed by BMW. |
Originally Posted by AMG Power
(Post 4299881)
Volvo and Polestar have officially parted ways. Polestar is no more shown on the Indian Volvo website. If at all it is available, it would be the last few pieces of a model where the official discontinuance has been announced. |
Originally Posted by AMG Power
(Post 4299853)
That's because they didn't fully test the 530D and so have used the figures off the website. See attached pic where ACI mentions that the 0-100 times are as claimed by BMW. |
Originally Posted by 84.monsoon
(Post 4299889)
Well they did do a detailed test later on in the August issue and the tested time is the same - 5.74 seconds. |
Originally Posted by reignofchaos
(Post 4299892)
Then what is this? https://www.volvocars.com/in/cars/ne...s/s60/polestar They just launched the new 2018 model internationally last month. |
Originally Posted by Dr.Naren
(Post 4299899)
Also as per Autocar the difference between Octavia RS and BMW 530i is hardly 0.04 seconds. |
Originally Posted by Dr.Naren
(Post 4299899)
Did they test both the cars on same road under same conditions? What was the fuel used? |
Originally Posted by AMG Power
(Post 4299907)
Would be the last few pieces of the model. Check this out: https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/amp.c...ways-with.html |
Originally Posted by reignofchaos
(Post 4299913)
Anyways this is way off topic. The matter in the end is the vRS has no peers in 30 lac range. However move to the 50-60 lac range and the Polestar eats everything else including the bimmers in pure straight line acceleration. The 70 lac cars (C43 AMG/S5) are in a similar ballpark in terms of performance with more frills. |
Originally Posted by BackInTheFold
(Post 4299766)
While I understand the sentiment, and without detracting from the impressive prowess of the vRS in any way, I believe that only a well put-together 6 cylinder or bi-turbo with creature/driver comforts could be an upgrade from a remapped Jetta 2.0 TDI :) Back to normal programming for this thread, this vRS is an excellent package. The features and scarcity will ensure that well maintained specimens will likely retain the allure of cult classics in the used car market. |
Originally Posted by stanjohn123
(Post 4300138)
Seems some guy's in India just did not want to wait for their warranties to get over. Crazy mods and crazy speeds below. https://www.rushlane.com/apr-tuned-s...-12253679.html |
Originally Posted by Shreyans_Jain
(Post 4300149)
Again, that is pushing things beyond the limits of the gearbox. The DQ250 is rated for only upto 400Nm, and the motor anyway makes near that in stock condition. |
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
(Post 4300199)
This is what I was thinking when I looked up the specs for DQ250. At stock 350 NM and a rating of 400 NM, there isn't much play left for mods beyond Stage 1. Not that I feel the need for a boost beyond stock but purely as an option, it is limited. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:09. |