Re: Skoda Kushaq Review So, a day ago I got a call from the Skoda showroom's Sales Manager of my town, telling me that the cars have reached and they would be doing the launching on Monday with all balloons and drama. He asked me if I could come today itself, he would be able to give me ample time with the Kushaq and a longer test drive.
Being a Sunday, it was easy for me , moreover I was lured by the empty showroom and exclusive test drive thingy and I moved my buns to reach the showroom.
There were two cars available , Style 1L (Manual) in white shade and Style 1L (Automatic) in silver shade. I spent good 1.5 hours or so at the showroom , test driving the vehicle thoroughly for around 15 Kms. (I am talking about the manual)
Here are my observations: Exteriors:
1. Loved the car's size . it is just appropriate fine and looks clean and subtle from all angles, elegant lines and feels well put up. Did not find inconsistencies in the panels.
2. The alloys look fabulous and comes with "not so good" Apollo Alnac rubber, better tyres recommended for potential buyers.
3. Boot area is cleverly designed, can gulp good quantity of bags since its deep enough as compared to its counterparts.
4. Blacked out lights with DRLs look cool, especially on the silver variant. DRLs are standard across all variants.
5. Tinted glasses seems to do the work and look fine. Interiors:
1. The steering design is unique, feels nice to hold and leather wrap quality is strictly average.
2. Ergonomics are fine except, I was unable to find a place to rest my right arm while driving since the height of windows is higher as compared as comparable to other vehicles I have driven. I really wished this was not the case. I would like to hear on this from fellow bhpians please.
3. Plastic quality felt better than the Creta's , although the air vents fins seemed very flimsy as pointed out by others as well.
4. Cabin is silent and feels secure, the doors are heavy as Skoda's doors are and instils confidence.
5. Sunroof is namesake and exposed hinges makes the matter worse, not good Skoda. You may check the pictures to understand the atrocity
6. Touchscreen's feel and shape and the way is designed in the overall interiors feels nice and aesthetically pleasing. Did not try it much since driving is what I was more focused towards.
7. Rear leg room is good, I am stout, 5.11" and as per my front seating, I was able to sit comfortably at the rear. Much better than ecopsort or Sonet, but then- that's a wrong comparison I guess. However, the rear seats are hard and one gets that feel immediately after sitting on them, and yes, it is strictly a 4 seater.
8. Side pockets felt useful and power window buttons felt robust. The Drive:
1. Loved the way she pulls, although bit more linear as compared to the Rapid.
2. Turbo lag is felt at low rpms but is definitely liveable.
3. The steering feel is as I predicted, no nonsense, no dead feel. Very responsive and weighs perfectly as per the speed.
4. Suspension seems to be tuned somewhere in between soft and stiffer side. I felt it was fine, did not feel much body roll although it was not sedan territory which is obvious for a higher GC vehicle.
5. The horn is paltry and and does not suit the car one bit. Unnecessary cost cutting.
6. Insulation seemed fine to me, I drove the car upto 140 km/hr and the sound proofing was spot on.
7. I would anyway feel more confident taking turns, doing high speed manoevurs and braking while driving the Kushaq as compared to the Creta. The car handles nicely and in a contained manner.
8. Tested the cruise control, it is simple to operate and as opposed from many other vehicles which activate post minimum speed of 40 km/hr., the Kushaq's cruise control can be activated from min. speed of 20km/hr.
The "hidden" Competitor:
To many on this forum and across the internet, the primary competitor to Kushaq is Creta/ Seltos and I understand the same owing to the same price bracket and stance of the vehicles.However, since I had good amount of time to spend at the showroom, I took the liberty of driving the Skoda Rapid as well, just to understand the reason for a difference of 3 lakhs between the two vehicles, both having the same engine.
I do not want to start a debate here, but I failed to understand why anyone would spend 12.xx lakhs for OTR price of a Kushaq while he/she can get the same pleasure (rather better) while driving the Rapid. Compared to Kushaq, the Rapid:
Felt more eager, more planted and more sorted fundamentally.
Its steering connect felt even better.
Has humongous boot.
Has proven safety.
Provides better seat comfort (rear)
I believe the few things going towards Kushaq's way is the novelty factor, increased Ground clearance and additional gizmos and features (in top spec variants). The Verdict
Kushaq is a good product, although cost cutting (especially in its interiors) is evident as compared to other Skoda's we have seen in India including the Fabia and Yeti. Since I am not very fond of sub 4 metre vehicles the Kushaq makes its own case of being neither here nor there.
That being said, over the Korean twins, if resale does not bother someone much and he/she wants to keep the car for a longer duration, has a decent service centre nearby, I would definitely recommend going ahead with the Kushaq, especially the active trim as compared to the E variant of Creta , which is too bare bones and has atrocious waiting periods.
Mind it, it shall be a pure heart over head decision but given the felt safety and dynamics, the Kushaq will surely bring smile to the driver's face , although for a much wider smile and that too at a lesser amount I would suggest the Rapid to all driving enthusiasts, you need to drive her to understand the joy.
Thank you fellow bhpians for showing patience and reading through, I would let the pictures do the talking now. |