4th May 2011, 02:20 | #46 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Ghaziabad/Hyderabad/Mysore
Posts: 1,432
Thanked: 339 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
I get your point, and support it fully. I bought a Figo early last year for my sister - she has been driving for years and does over 100km on weekdays. I bought her a ZXI (not titanium - saving money). My reason - the budget was already too stretched, she wouldn't accept a cheaper car and in any case cheaper cars didn't have ABS/airbags back then (or even now). If the price was even 20k lower, I would have bought it. Today I do regret it. I bought my Figo last week, and I bought a titanium this time. Now I drive very very slow so airbags are not useful - my seatbelts will protect me in almost any collision conceivable where airbags could be useful. On the other hand I have a baby and she'll be traveling on her mother's lap. I don't know how often on the front seat. God forbid I get into a minor accident and the airbag deploys, she'll be injured. I just didn't want the Airbag and AFAIK I can't even turn it off in Figo for the passenger. I'll just be asking my wife to push the seat as far back as possible and then tilt a little to keep 1ft of distance between the baby and the dash. BUT I did want the ABS. I'm a new driver so my reaction times are slow, and also in rains things get very slippery here. Plus I have no clue when my sister/cousin/wife's cousin lands in town and goes on a drive - they drive a little fast and in Hyderabad there are so many crazies on the road accident will happen. I agonised a lot but then took Titanium (It did help that this time I had the cash to pay for it). I even went to these guys and asked whether they could install ABS on ZXI or remove airbags from Titanium. As you are saying a choice would have been better - much better for my situation. However if ABS was compulsory more likely than not it would be cheaper too, thanks to the economies of scale. Someone mentioned that this will become mandatory within a few years - I am hoping it does happen - if nothing else it'll reduce the costs. | |
() Thanks |
|
4th May 2011, 09:49 | #47 |
BANNED Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Gurugram
Posts: 7,969
Thanked: 4,786 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. In India we have a belief that Accidents only happen to others. So the demand is for the minimum features which add to the price. Even today in Kanpur i see not more than 10% drivers using belts! As for passengers (front or rear) this is even lower. |
(2) Thanks |
The following 2 BHPians Thank sgiitk for this useful post: | .anshuman, phamilyman |
4th May 2011, 12:48 | #48 | ||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: On-board JWST
Posts: 1,375
Thanked: 4,068 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
First of all, it's way too dangerous to travel with kid(s) in lap. Reason : Both the kid as well as the parent are subjected to enormous impulse of force even in case of crash at 30kmph. The parent may not even have that fraction of second to hold on tightly to kid and the baby may hit the dashboard/ windscreen or driver/ co-driver seats (in case of seating in rear seats). Secondly, if the parent 'carries' the baby by using strap-on belt, the baby can get crushed in between. Now, if a seat belt is worn by the parent (across the baby as well) the rib cage of baby is not strong enough to bear the forces of seat belts in case of a mis-hap thereby inflicting serious injuries. Volvo, and a number of other crash safety organizations, recommend to use a child seat (in accordance to the age, weight and size of the child). Also, they recommend to place the seat facing backwards so as to provide maximum support and cushion to the child. I've seen lot many parents buying child seats, but putting it wrong way just because kid is happy to see the things in front and stops crying . A typical case was of my colleague in my previous organization. She (even though she's a car chassis engineer) used to keep the seat wrong way. She put the seat in the correct position only after I shower her the aforesaid article from Volvo. My suggestion to all parents is to buy suitable child seats and put them in correct position. Quote:
Here is a video from BOSCH : http://dl3.interlake.net/shared/wm/M...g_with_abs.wmv There have been few debates regarding the effectiveness of steering the vehicle away from the obstacle (in addition to emergency braking) on busy roads/ highways. The debate arises from the fact that the braking & steering to next lane might leave one stationary in front of speeding traffic in that lane and result in collision from rear end. Worse that the time one is just swirling to the next lane, the on-coming traffic hits resulting in side-impact. Most of the vehicles in the world are much sturdier in full-frontal crash and offset-frontal crash as compared to side impact and rear impact. As for the airbags, they are Supplemental Restraint System (SRS), and are effective only if the seat belts are put on. In case of a crash, the seat belt provides initial (and major) restraint to the body and allows the airbag to deploy. If no seat belt is worn, driver/ passenger will be thrown towards dashboard/ windscreen even before the airbag had a chance of deployment. And the whole thing takes only fraction of second. So I'll say once again, as it has been highlighted many times of this forum, wear seat belts when in vehicle, equally applicable for driver and passengers. So, a driver should always be aware of surroundings (including traffic behind) and be in control of the vehicle; and never leave something fully on the systems. The systems are there to assist and not to take actions. The response time of driver is very important in such situations. Even in aircrafts, the auto-pilot flies the plane in normal conditions and at that time too, both the pilots are not allowed to take the permitted small nap at the same time. One pilot must keep watch on the displays, meters, dials and controls. The complex tasks of take-off and landing are carried out by both the pilots together. | ||
(1) Thanks |
The following BHPian Thanks AutoNoob for this useful post: | selfdrive |
4th May 2011, 12:59 | #49 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 5,968
Thanked: 4,635 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Its very simple - hardly any top end safety pack vehicles are sold to begin with. Why increase complexity & offer the same option to the base customers? |
() Thanks |
4th May 2011, 13:54 | #50 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,196
Thanked: 166 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. ^^Probably because car makers charge a fat premium for top-end versions that are not seen as VFM by the customer. So it is not a question of not wanting safety features in many cases, but not being able to afford the feature-laden full option models. |
() Thanks |
4th May 2011, 14:47 | #51 | |||
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,962
Thanked: 3,534 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. As for the question in the OP, I agree with a resounding YES. For example, if I want to buy a Scorpio with airbags today, I have to also pay for other bells and whistles which I do not really want. I mean do I really care about/ want sensors that activate the wipers when it rains? Cars should ideally be offered with addons on the base model. While this would probably take some more time, it would be customised to fit the client requirements. Basically the car manufacturers are reflecting the general buying trend of India. If the car buyer can afford airbags/ abs he or she can afford the top end version. T Quote:
Quote:
Nevertheless, assuming this to be true it is even more relevant that the manufacturers reduce the cost to the customer by offering what he/ she wants. So if I want airbags/ ABS and dont want the other jingles, I should have the option to refuse what I dont want. I guess this is the purpose of this thread. Quote:
there are multiple reasons why children should not be travelling in someone's lap or left to stand in the vehicle. They should be properly seated in their own seat (may be a child car seat for younger kids) and belted up. Its even riskier if the kid is travelling in someone's lap and the both of them are belted up in the same seatbelt. Last edited by selfdrive : 4th May 2011 at 14:53. | |||
() Thanks |
4th May 2011, 15:34 | #52 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,400
Thanked: 121 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
Selfdrive, note that you agree or not Cars for someone in India is still a luxury. Only 14 in 1000 in India have cars compared to 39 in China and around 800 odd in US. Go and look into history countries with this much rates of car penetration (i.e. US and Euro during 60's) had also faced this kind of difficulty selling a car with safety package. The only thing that can change is when people assume they contain value, not by rules and regulation. We are in a country where even if a manufacturer increases the price by 500 to 1000 INR it captures the headlines of the newspapers. That describes the impact that adding the bells and whistles of Airbag etc would create on the car buying behaviour. Additionally there are hunderds of safety tools for the car, why are you just sticking to airbags. I mean if you are really paranoid about safety then why ignore things like EPS, Infrared night vision, Adaptive high beam lamps, Reverse back up sensor, Adaptive Cruise control, lane change indicator etc. For which I can talk pages on why its required and why its crucial for lives of the people. I am seeing people only keep repeating airbags again and again as safety device, and want to make them compulsory just because US and Euro countries have them as mandatory. Is that the reason you give as a justification? Then why not things like Night Infrared vision and cornering brake control system, They are not decorative items Last edited by xingamazon : 4th May 2011 at 15:37. | |
() Thanks |
4th May 2011, 16:01 | #53 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,962
Thanked: 3,534 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
And buddy, secondly, I dont say these safety features should be mandatory. All I am saying is that if I want airbags/ ABS, I should not have to pay for the other bells and whistles (namely rain sensors/ body colored door handles etc). If I want safety features I should get it as additional even to the base model. basically I should be able to buy the base version and pay extra for airbags & ABS instead of paying much more for the top end version of the same car just because it has airbags/ ABS. This is the very question in the OP. I mention airbags and ABS specifically as they are the base safety options that are offered by the OEM in India. For example, if I go to a showroom with 7L in my pocket this is what I can get in India. So why should I spend money on things which I dont want? To answer your question IMHO, I think airbags have a better chance at saving lives in my car than EPS, Infrared night vision, Adaptive high beam lamps, Reverse back up sensor, Adaptive Cruise control, lane change indicator etc. I understand you have your opinion, but if I as a customer want only two features I should be allowed to buy that, right? | |
() Thanks |
4th May 2011, 16:05 | #54 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Mostly Mumbai
Posts: 1,702
Thanked: 1,452 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. I think the most fully loaded base variant with most features sold in India is the Tata Aria. The feature list beats most European base variants too. |
() Thanks |
5th May 2011, 01:41 | #55 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Ghaziabad/Hyderabad/Mysore
Posts: 1,432
Thanked: 339 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Very good post autonoob, here are my comments: Quote:
I sort of agree with that. Man should have control over the machine. | |
() Thanks |
5th May 2011, 11:39 | #56 |
BHPian Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Chandigarh
Posts: 221
Thanked: 46 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. My answer to this question is YES. I had met with an accident at about 120kmph [but was unhurt] only because my car lost grip due to braking suddenly when confronted by a cow and toppled several times and nearly took another car with it. When I look back at it I get scared of driving fast, because fast is not safe in the case of an emergency for me as well as others on the road. If only all cars come with ABS as standard and one does not have to pay for crappy speakers, ACC or fancy gadgetry it will benefit the entire commuting population and such situations can be avoided . In most cases ABS does its job quietly and people are not even aware of it. In India even though the speeds are low the roads don't offer a lot of grip due to potholes, debris and generally poor driving habits so for the safety of all MANUFACTURER'S PLEASE OFFER ABS AS STANDARD |
() Thanks |
|
5th May 2011, 12:53 | #57 |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,962
Thanked: 3,534 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. IMHO, it is only such realisations by ous buying customers which if translated into sales will make the manufacturers realise that their ABS equipped models are selling more than the base versions. However, it is still totally unfair that they are forcing the Indian car buyer to pay for other things. but as an example, if we order a plate of idli with chutney for example, would we like it if we are forced to pay for the breakfast buffet that includes dosas/ wadas and omlettes (even though you dont want any of it)? Last edited by selfdrive : 5th May 2011 at 12:56. Reason: typo corrected |
() Thanks |
5th May 2011, 14:32 | #58 | |
BHPian Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Pune
Posts: 360
Thanked: 121 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
Lesson learnt, the New Fabia comes with many useful features deleted but at a reasonable price! | |
() Thanks |
5th May 2011, 15:21 | #59 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,400
Thanked: 121 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
Do you realize that having Idli in a shop selling just idlis is cheaper than the cost of having idli in a shop which offers Dosa, vada and omlettes. Because there is some cost involved in providing additional choices. Likewise, providing the option of putting ABS and Airbag even in base variants would mean the cost of base variants (even withouth them) will increase. Thus manufacturers will loose out the edge in India, as VFM is the primary selling point. That is the reason no manufacturer provides them in base variant. | |
() Thanks |
5th May 2011, 15:50 | #60 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,962
Thanked: 3,534 Times
| Re: Optional safety features with base variants. Quote:
1. a first mid range version which is in fact the base version + safety features 2. a second mid range version which can be the mid range version offered today (base version + other features, not necessarily safety features) 3. top end version, whatever they want to offer Subsequently, customers have the choice to buy what they want and dont end up paying for things they dont want. In any case they take months to deliver cars; at least it will be more beneficial to the Indian buyer if they get a version that is customised to their needs. | |
() Thanks |