![]() | #211 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Another clarification Lalvaz, I have not worked at ARAI but did my M.tech course from there. I just want to you to know that am in no way representing ARAI here. Every new car that is sold in the country has to be compliant with CMVR rules and IS/AIS standards applicable as per the class of the vehicle. This process is known as type approval/homologation. Independent authorities such as ARAI, ICAT, CIRT etc, provide testing and homologation facilities for manufacturers to get their vehicles type approved before launching in the market. The following are tests related to passive safety that are performed as a part of the type approval process. *Full frontal vehicle crash testing as per IS:11939/ECE-R-12 Offset frontal crash test as per ECE R94/AIS-98 *Side impact Test as per ECE R95/AIS 99** Rear impact test as per ECE R32/AIS 101 These above standards can easily be found on the internet and are in line with European standards. After the manufacturer gets the type approval certificates they send copies to MORTH(ministry of road transport) and regional RTAs before the sales begin. These documents/reports are confidential and the manufacturers don't have to disclose them in public since they already have the govt. approval. We are able to get comparative performance of already homologated vehicles, when they are tested at a higher severity level by independent organizations such as Euro NCAP, global NCAP, ASEAN, Japan, China, etc. What is currently being proposed is that we should have an Indian NCAP to help consumers make decisions based on comparative safety levels of these homologated vehicles. Until the Indian NCAP becomes a reality, one could probably explore the RTI route or even file a PIL. Not sure if someone has already tried it and how effective it might turn out to be. Last edited by DReddy : 18th November 2014 at 13:56. | |
![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() | #212 | |
BANNED Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Tapukara
Posts: 275
Thanked: 469 Times
| ![]() Quote:
The things that go into consideration are: - The vehicle is highly unlikely to hit a stationary block of iron that can't be deformed. So some energy will be absorbed by the object. Usually it is the other car that absorbs some energy by deforming or the brick and mortar divider that breaks and decelerates the vehicle. Think of it as being hit in the head by a thick iron rod and a wooden stick. Of same sizes and at same speeds, of course. For the same reason of absorbing energy, the vehicles have 'collapsible steering columns' and 'crumble zones.' - Second, it is highly unlikely that the the driver won't attempt to decelerate. So even if the driver was driving at 100 and applied brakes, the impact won't be at 100, but at a substantially lower speed. I once had to apply front discs on P180 at 105 kmph and still ended up rear ending a truck. Do you think I hit the truck at 100? Therefore, an average impact speed of 64 into a hard object (that doesn't deform) is more realistic to cover the bases well. Please pour in your insights as well. P.S.: That getting hit from behind thing is 'Backlash/Whiplash Protection,' which is a safety feature usually found in cars well above the 1 Million rupee mark. Last edited by MaheshY1 : 18th November 2014 at 16:20. Reason: More info | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #213 | |
BHPian | ![]() Quote:
The first thing a driver does in emergencies is applying brakes. So even if there's only a couple of seconds time to apply the brake, the speed will invariably be reduced by some 20/30 kmph from it's original speed. So it can be assumed that most of the collisions will occur only in the vicinity of 60-70 kmph. (even for the speeding cars) | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #214 | |
Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Bombay
Posts: 1,230
Thanked: 1,374 Times
| ![]() Quote:
The link http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/i...w/38392217.cms states that currently there is no govt crash testing facility in India and two centres are being setup by December 2014 in Pune and Manesar. Another report on automotive testing says that the ARAI centres will be ready by Dec 2013, http://www.automotivetestingtechnolo...?ArticleID=200 It appears that the ARAI centre is the govt centre and a part of the NATRIP, but never knew ARAI is govt controlled. Anyways, let's assume ARAI conducts these crash tests as part of homologation activities. Are these tests performed on the Indian spec car or the imported spec car? For instance was the Indian swift tested and did it pass or fail? I guess since these results are not in the public domain, (although why should a passed result be hidden from the public), we will never know the answers, but surely any sane man will doubt the integrity of ARAI with the recently published crash results. Ironically in a Tata motors report at the end of Fy 2011, they claim that they have the only certified crash testing facility in India, so I can only imagine what sort of crash testing took place for the Indian Swift. http://www.tatamotors.com/sustainabi...innovation.pdf Last edited by GTO : 20th November 2014 at 15:15. Reason: No personal jabs please | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #215 | ||
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() Quote:
TEST SPEED Vehicle speed at the moment of impact shall be 56 -0/+1 km/h. However, if the test was performed at a higher impact speed and the vehicle met the requirements, the test shall be considered satisfactory. For more details you can download the published standards from ARAI website https://www.araiindia.com/Publish_AIS_Standards.asp As I mentioned earlier, these crash test videos and reports are not available in the public domain and are solely used by the manufacturers and govt. authorities to certify the vehicle being tested, which is the same practice with any homologation/certification authority across the world. It is only because, the various NCAP organizations perform their own crash tests and publish the results, that we are able to see them. Quote:
Also, instead of assuming a particular speed, decades of on road accident research data is used to decide upon it. Research done on human cadavers involved in accidents was used to assess the damage to various body parts at different speeds to arrive at what is an acceptable impact force that the body can take without sustaining significant injuries. | ||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #216 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Full frontal vehicle crash testing as per IS:11939/ECE-R-12 and Offset frontal crash test as per ECE R94/AIS-98 The IS:11939 specifies a rigid barrier of 3m thick concrete, weighing atleast 70 tons. source:https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/...11939.1996.pdf. Was not able to copy the text! This simulates a head on collision of two cars travelling in opposite direction at the same speed . I know it doesn't make since when you think about it, but it works on basic engineering mechanics. If the barrier is rigid enough to not get affected by the impact force, it gives the same amount of reaction force(similar to that of another car moving in opposite direction). The AIS-98 specifies a deformable barrier with the following specifications DEFINITION OF DEFORMABLE BARRIER 1. COMPONENT AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS The dimensions of the barrier are illustrated in Figure 1 of this Annex. The dimensions of the individual components of the barrier are listed separately below. 1.1. Main Honeycomb Block Dimensions Height: 650 mm (in direction of honeycomb ribbon axis) Width: 1000 mm Depth: 450 mm (in direction of honeycomb cell axes) All above dimensions should allow a tolerance of ± 2.5 mm Material: Aluminium 3003 (ISO 209, Part 1) Foil Thickness: 0.076 mm ± 15% Cell Size: 19.1 mm ± 20% Density: 28.6 kg/m3 ± 20% Crush Strength: 0.342 MPa +0% -10% Source:https://araiindia.com/hmr/Control/AI...~PMAIS-098.pdf Out of the above two tests, the offset frontal impact is considered to be more severe and also a realistic simulation of what happens in a real accident. We not only try to decelerate but also try to swerve to avoid a full frontal head on collision ![]() Accident research has shown that intrusion into the passenger compartment is the major cause of fatal and serious injuries suffered by restrained car occupants in frontal impacts. Current frontal test procedures, which use rigid barriers impacting the full car width, generate high vehicle decelerations and seat belt loads but very low levels of intrusion. Source: http://papers.sae.org/950501/ The AIS-101 only specifies the requirements of the fuel tank in case of rear impact. But we do have a very basic from of whiplash protection even in the humble NANO. The head restraints'(or head rests as they are popularly known as) primary purpose is to prevent whiplash injuries in case of rear impact(pic attached). | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #217 |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: BengaLuru
Posts: 4,339
Thanked: 10,246 Times
| ![]() Thanks for all the details. Gives a clearer picture of the Indian scene rather than rants. So can I assume that suppose a car doesnt meet these requirements, it will not be allowed to go on sale in the market? I would be lot relieved if the government does have some crash safety requirements rather than having none. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #218 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() Quote:
Source: http://www.automotivetestingtechnolo...?ArticleID=200 The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is building the testing equipment and facilities needed for compliance of the new regulations of the ‘Road map of Passive Safety’ to be implemented in India by 2013. It will be an upgrade of its existing testing facilities and will include a fully equipped crash track with electric drive, a facility for pedestrian testing, as well as high-speed cameras and test dummies, among other technologies. The facility will come under the National Automotive Testing, Research and Development Project (NATRiP). “ARAI is building a fully-fledged crash test facility at Chakan in Pune (Maharashtra) to cater the Western auto hub with NATRiP, while NATRiP is building its own crash testing facilities at the International Centre for Automotive Technology (iCAT) Manesar (Haryana) in North and G-ARC (Global Automotive Research Centre) in down South in Chennai,” informed Mr Mannikar, deputy director of ARAI in Pune. As the article mentions they are 'upgrading' their existing facilities. The information age has reduced our attention spans, and I am pretty sure that the times article could have been an 'innocent misinterpretation' on part of the article writer. The Automotive research association of India was set up in 1960s in pune as a nodal centre where Automotive manufacturers could share research and testing facilities, thus making it accessible to all manufacturers. The initiative was taken by TELCO(Erstwhile Tata Motors) and currently has 72 member companies. https://www.araiindia.com/member_company.aspx. Although it does come under the purview of MoRTH(ministry of road transport) it is not 'controlled' by the government per se. ARAI is an autonomous organization which serves in an advisory role to the govt. Independent research activities in areas such as Powertrain, Structural dynamics, passive safety, emissions etc. is done for various automotive manufacturers. ARAI has played a key role in the adaptation and introduction of various safety regulations based on UNECE. If anything they have advised the govt. as well as manufacturers to upgrade to and make our safety norms inline with international standards. It is a member of WP29 working committee which works towards Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations across the world In existence for more than 50 years, and with participants coming from all over the world, especially the main motor vehicle producing countries, the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP 29) offers a unique framework for globally harmonized regulations on vehicles. The benefits of such harmonized regulations are tangible in road safety, environmental protection and trade. Source:http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29...docs_wp29.html The car that is intended to be sold in India is only sent for homologation irrespective of whether it is an internationally available model or not. Be rest assured that the Swift would not have been allowed to be sold if it had not cleared the specified norms. If you are still doubtful, you could always file an RTI ![]() The news of "Already homologated" cars getting 0 stars when tested by agencies such as Global NCAP is being termed as 'failed to meet norms' which is not true. As mentioned earlier in this same thread by other Bhpians too, the NCAP testing is of higher severity when compared to the regulatory requirements(which are inline with 'phoren' regulations). You should probably go through this very well written thread on the forum to understand what NCAP is all about. http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/indian...r-picture.html The lack of an independent advisory agency which publishes results in public domain like the NCAP, is being interpreted as a complete lack of testing facilities in the country. By the way, this is also being addressed and we will soon have our own Bharat New Vehicle Safety Assessment Program Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharat_...ssment_Program The Tata motors article could also have been an 'innocent typo'. My guess is they might have written it as 'the only crash testing facility in India' instead of the 'only in house crash testing(at a manufacturer's premises) facility in India'. I say this because I saw a lot of BIWs which were tested and discarded behind the passive safety lab at ARAI in 2011-12. We used to play 'carIQ' whenever a new BIW was spotted. Although we did not get to watch a live crash test, we got to see some videos during our lab training. Last edited by GTO : 20th November 2014 at 15:16. Reason: Quoted post edited | |
![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() | #219 |
BHPian Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 43
Thanked: 12 Times
| ![]() Its pathetic how safety is the least of the concerns for Indian players. I still remember in 2007 when I was on the lookout to upgrade from my old Maruti 800, there were very few options in the market that offered Air Bags and ABS. Luckily SX4 was released around the same time which offered these features and I was probably the first customer in Hyderabad to have booked an ZXI then. I feel that the realization should also come from the consumers also. I have seen many people not willing to spend that extra money and get models which offer these safety features even though they can afford it. I will never buy a car if it does not have these features. Period. No compromise on that at all. In Maruti's defense, I think that they dont price the high end variants way too high and that is the reason you tend to notice far more high end variants from Maruti on the roads when compared to any other manufacturer. At lease from my observation, this has been an increasing trend lately and we should encourage it. |
![]() |
![]() | #220 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() The following document published in 1997 by the US NHTSA talks about harmonization of frontal impact testing standards worldwide. There is a part that I thought might be relevant in the Indian perspective. NHTSA has continued to engage its counterparts in the European community in discussions regarding frontal impact protection. As early as 1979, NHTSA researchers outlined the NHTSA's research findings and regulatory requirements at international meetings and conferences. However, with belt use rates at 95 percent, there was little incentive for Europeans to adopt the U.S. unrestrained test requirement or begin a research program, prior to 1990. Source:http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/cras...rt.html#offrt7 The FMVSS rule no. 208 describes the requirements for frontal impact testing in the USA. It also includes one test at a lower speed where seat belts are not used and the resulting impact force on occupants is assessed. Given the very low usage of seat belts in our country, don't you think we should also be demanding such a requirement to be fulfilled by our manufacturers along with the other safety features. Every country has different requirements, more so in our case. I feel we can only truly address the issue of road fatalities in our country when we take up full fledged accident research and come up with exhaustive data to assess what kind of safety features are needed for our cars. This was started by the western world as early as the 70s, something like this should be started right now when the vehicle penetration in our country is low. Imagine the situation of our roads when more than one fourth of our population moves into the car buying bracket! Last edited by DReddy : 19th November 2014 at 22:41. Reason: spacing |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #221 | |
Distinguished - BHPian ![]() ![]() | ![]() Quote:
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #222 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: KL
Posts: 924
Thanked: 1,108 Times
| ![]() Wait a minute, so people were assuming till now that our country did not have any kind of approvals for launching a car? I would be surprised if someone in senses believed so. Obviously those standards of testing and approvals prove comparatively insufficient when tests conducted by other organisations among the same cars being sold here shows huge difference in safety between those cars and some seem to be sub standard. Just like how roads in many parts of the country seem like what it should have been 20 years ago and totally insufficient for today, this seems to be an issue which needs to be revised or which should have been revised a long time ago. If not, this topic would not even have come up for anyone to make such statements. |
![]() |
![]() | #223 | ||
BHPian ![]() Join Date: May 2011 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 69
Thanked: 139 Times
| ![]() Quote:
I guess the auto wallahs will be having their last laugh then. They would happily be zipping around scraping paint off cars, while we are left to do a new urban phenomenon termed as SOYBATT (Sit-on-your-bum-and-twiddle-thumbs --- All credit to the people who coined it) ![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by DReddy : 20th November 2014 at 07:54. | ||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #224 | |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: KL
Posts: 924
Thanked: 1,108 Times
| ![]() Quote:
![]() Problem is, high time these things are revised to meet higher standards. And basic safety kit made mandatory across the range of cars by the regulatory bodies so that makers not only provide it but also think about cost effectiveness of providing it (without charging a much higher premium) like how it is in countries where these things are mandatory. | |
![]() |
![]() | #225 |
BHPian ![]() Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 878
Thanked: 1,478 Times
| ![]() So a Swift passing our "stringent" crash test at 40kmph is good enough, and VW is really stupid for making a car that would pass the test even at 64kmph. Means we can all be contented that our cars "pass" the stringent India test. But is that what we want/need? That it passes some lousy third world test, or whether the car is indeed safe? |
![]() | ![]() |