Re: Hyundai i10 given 1-star adult safety rating by ASEAN NCAP To my mind, its a simple question of demand and supply. What gets sold is what customer is comfortable accepting at a particular price point.
Major part of the entire problem about lack of safety features lies in customers not demanding those features. Older generation or rural consumers are both poor examples - they are not the only ones saying no to safety features, its the collective consumer segment as a whole that is responsible. Yes, there are individuals with higher safety perception due to growing awareness and exposure, yet that number is small, too small for either the auto manufacturing body or the Government to take any concrete steps.
Lets not blame the government or the auto makers here for a minute, and lets take a pragmatic look at the problem. Who would not like to see lesser accidents, lesser fatalities, and lesser damage to property. Certainly, government including, everyone will like to see changes which lead to these outcomes. However, the task of lawmakers is not easy, as public perception and support from industry is very important for more reasons than one. Government of any day or age, or of any country would not like to make enemies at home.
Introduction of safety features in cars is a no brainer - its a must have. Yet, must have for whom? For the consumers and their families of course. But why would an average consumer suddenly become interested in not following the norm and doing something different (by choosing models with safety features only and by making safety features as the cornerstone of their judgement). Where's the incentive for that average consumer to go against the popular tide? Till such time that there is no incentive, who would want to change? Consumers can have herd mentality among other behavioral factors which leads to mass choices, choices which a logical, sane mind will reject but an influenced mind will accept.
To kickstart that change in behavior and choices, is to induce incentives. Incentives, like having lesser road tax on models with 4 airbags than model with no airbags, like making insurance companies provide mandatory additional riders to make insurance more expensive for models with no safety features (for example - hike the insurance rates so that base model i10 or Alto insurance premium is 10% more than models with airbags and ESR, ABS, etc). Incentives like offering 17 year validity of Registration as against 15 years for models with no safety features. Incentives like offering VIP registration numbers to vehicles with higher safety features (now that one is sure to lift the demand of models with better safety features in a city like Delhi).
The added advantage for Government is that there is no cost to the government, auto makers lobby wont be up in arms as the intention is to popularize sale of vehicle models with safety features and it doesnt require any major investment in terms of compliance to crash tests, setting up crash facilities, etc.
Once consumers find that auto-incentive to go for higher safety models, automakers will be forced to produce more and more of the 'safer' models and ultimately discontinue or reduce to a trickle the sales of models with no safety features.
The key is to provide incentives and create demand for a particular feature set rather than take the longish, winding road through regulations and infrastructure related changes which the government has planned. In this way, the 'real' results can be achieved in 2 years, lets say, over the current plan of endless waiting for real change to happen. |