Re: Why the heck will Maruti-Suzuki not fix its defective & dangerous steering behaviour? **Apologies/Warning for the long post.
After working as a vehicle dynamics engineer for the past decade on both passenger cars and heavy commercial vehicles, I can say with some conviction that every automobile steering system should have self-centering characteristics and from a drivers perspective too it is natural to expect positive centering of steering post completion of a turn. What causes steering self-centering?
Mainly the steered wheel's geometry like caster and kingpin inclination and to a large extent the tyre characteristics (safe to assume, smaller the tyre foot print/wheel geometry value, lesser the self centering).
Reasons why most of the A segment cars in india would suffer from poor steering self -centering are:
1. Tiny contact patch tyres (145-155mm width) for maximising fuel economy.
2. Less wheel geometry (caster/KPI angles) for reduced steering effort and avoiding other complications like tyre wear. Implications of aggressive wheel geometry?
Pro's
1. Positive road feel at high speeds
2. Good Self-centering at low speeds
Con's
1. Higher steering effort at low speeds.
2. Sensitive to road irregularities (steering kickback)
3. Follows road crown/camber at high speeds (vehicle pull)
4. Geometrically more forces coming to crucial steering and suspension components which means they have to be built stronger or in other words means lesser profit for manufacturer.
A Fiat Punto/Linea or a Renault Duster driver will be able to associate with the above mentioned points Misconception associated with Type of steering assistance (HPS better than EPS?)
First of all, self centering occurs when the driver stops giving inputs to the steering wheel, which means there is no positive steering assistance forces acting on the system. So an EPS system should theoretically have lesser resistance compared to a HPS (resistance from hydraulic fluid back flow) to return back to center position. Another important factor is the ability to apply assistance characteristics specific to a large variation of vehicle speed and driver input torque with an EPS over an almost passive characteristic of a HPS.
For the same reason a well tuned EPS can have better steering feel, effort and overall quality when compared to a HPS. I explained this mainly because many car enthusiasts have a perception that hydraulic steering have better feel and feedback... This may be the fact 10 years ago, but given today's advancements in terms of electric steering system design and capability, HPS can not hold a candle.
P.S: I myself drive a 2015 fiat punto evo 90hp and love the steering feel, but hate the fact that it pulls on highways and kicks back like crazy over road bumps. Why EPS may be better?
As mentioned earlier, The biggest advantage of an Electric Power Assistance system is the enormous programming possibilities available to enable multiple functional requirements.
Ford india launched the active centering and vehicle pull compensation feature in the updated fiesta mk6 and eco sport models quite some time ago. The system basically reduces driver intervention for road crown pull correction by applying a counter torque as well as for cross winds and help bring the steering back to 0 degree position post completion of a turn. The angle and torque sensors help the steering controller to know how and when to do this. Currently a lot of cars like the hyundai creta, kia seltos and even smaller segment cars like the nano and tiago are equipped with such systems that enable positive steering return without compromising steering feel or worrying about road crown induced pull.
In a nutshell, self centering will be good if there is sufficient wheel geometry to create it and least friction in the system to resist it. But in certain cases friction is deliberately introduced to serve two purposes:
1. Higher friction allows one to set the steering in the ideal centre position without continuous driver effort in case of a vehicle pull due to road crown.
2. The higher effort due to the friction will mask any loose feel present in the steering on centre during highway speeds.
For most beginner drivers the above two points will not even be bothersome and may rather appreciate such a feel.
The down side is the poor self centering at low speeds, leading to increased driver effort to bring the wheel manually back to center after a turn.
An ideal EPS can strike the perfect balance for all of these steering parameters if properly tuned, considering the actively variable assistance advantage.
All the above mentioned things, require substantial time, money and expertise for tuning. What some OEMs fail to understand is where to trade off performance with profitability or time to market. And from what I have witnessed, the average indian drivers requirements in terms of Ride & Handling in a car are only increasing day by day. I hope OEMs can keep up with this demand by optimising their product development route. An interesting Incident:
In the past, one of the hcv (bus) model from the organisation i used to work for, participated in a tender for induction in the ghat section fleet for tirupati. It was turned down after the fleet test drivers complained of poor self centering of the steering. Imagine turning the steering from full lock to lock and then returning it back to center for over 40 to 50 hairpin bends. It was later found to be a tolerancing issue with the front axle, causing high friction to the steering which was then quickly corrected. I mention this to emphasise how important self centering of steering is for both driver comfort and eventually safety.
Regards,
Badri
Last edited by baddy : 21st January 2021 at 19:07.
|