Indian media and responsible? The Indian media specially the TV one are a bunch of jokers whose only aim is to sensationalise every issue. Indian news channels are the only news channels in the world that present their news in a very filmy manner, background music and the works. It's hilarious. Who needs comedy shows when we have 24X7 news. And I am always amazed at the sarcastic language they use, specially Aaj Tak. Yesterday some news channel was presenting the news of Ash-Abhi wedding with Shennai playing in the background!
About the world cup, the way we are discussing our debacle, a American may actually end up thinking that only one person plays cricket and he is solely responsible for our defeat. Greg Chappell is the unfortunate scapegoat in this situation. Cricket is a team game and it's high time we blamed the actual playing eleven instead. I would love to be a Indain cricketer today. If we win then it's dada's magic (88 runs in almost 120 ***** against BERMUDA) or it's our comeback kid Sehwag ( a century against BERMUDA) and so on. If we lose the coach is responsbile! I wonder why we never utter the word Greg Chappell when we win. If we blame him solely for our losses then logically shouldn't we thank him for making us win when we do? And what about the BCCI and the officials? What the hell is Sharad Pawar or any other politician doing in the BCCI? Have they ever played cricket? Do they know the spelling of cricket? Shouldn't they be asked to go alongwith Chappell, Dravid and others too? Ironically these politicians give out statements like heads will roll for our performance and so on. Are they above all responsiblity?
The SMS episode is another attempt at maligning Chappell. The SMS was sent by the coach in response to an article by Rajan Bala. And why are the board members and former cricketers angry with Chappell for leaking the secret board meeting discussions to the media. Firstly, Chappel didn't send the sms to the media. He sent it to Rajan Bala and he leaked that SMS to the media. And secondly, why the secrecy in team selection. Whats there to hide? Why can't the board meeting be transparent? The first line of the SMS says "Excellent article" which clearly shows that Chappell was responding to an article by Bala. BUT, the media is making it seem like the coach sent that SMS to the media trying to shift responsiblity for the loss on the senior players. I think it was ZEE that presented this news as "Chappell ki nayi chaal." What the bloody hell is wrong with us? I think Chappell will be only to happy to be relieved of his duties as a coach. And I'd love to see Sandeep Patil or any other "Indian stalwart' take over. Lets see what magic they weave with these bunch of models cum part time cricketers. TImes Now was among the best this morning. They had Sir Richard Hadlee who was very measured and objective in his responses. He said in NZ the coach has full authority to choose this team and hence can be held responsible for the defeats. In India, the coach has barely any say in team selection. If you don't give the coach the team he wants then it's not fair to blame him for the defeats too.
Why do we lose all objectivity in issues. There is always a lot of brouhaha and noise about what will be done and ultimately nothing happens. The media is already speculating and quoting there sources that Yuvraj will be made the captain. Cricket is a team game. We lost because the team failed to play well. Why don't we realise that? No one person wins the game and no one person loses it. But then our whole society and culture is extremely personality driven and I guess thats the problem. |