Quote:
Originally Posted by alpha1 Could never understand how conservatism stands for market capitalism, and how liberalism could stand for authoritative communism? |
That is because two concepts are being discussed together. One is social (societal values or zeitgeist), the other is economics.
In the context of this thread,
Who are conservatives? Those who insist on evolutionary or organic changes. They want every change meet the test of time before it is fully accepted.
Who are liberals? Those who are open to revolutionary changes if they think the cause is worth it.
One can be socially liberal and economically conservative. This is what most Wall Street people are. People who are both socially and economically conservative are mostly boomers or older rich. People who are both socially and economically liberal are mostly millennials and progressives. Then there are socially conservatives and economically liberal people, they are spread all across the spectrum, but most fall in middle class category. Note the word mostly, there are always exceptions.
Since this thread is about social aspect, let's discuss that. Economic aspect as been discussed often enough in the economics thread, where I have rooted for ideas of
Bernie Sanders. The social aspect that Musk talks about is entirely different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by v1p3r This is a very narrow view of the world. One cannot expect him to understand various issues, and this amplification of his views will become problematic in the future. |
Musk is quite crude in how he comes across. That is a real problem. But he does indeed shed light on liberalism gone amok.
Quote:
Originally Posted by v1p3r The truth of the matter is that humanity's evolution is a continuous evolution process. What was ridiculed as 'woke' and 'progressive' decades ago is the norm today. Two hundred years ago, slavery was perfectly legal in most regions. In India, women were burnt on funeral pyres, and 'untouchables' were beaten up for crossing shadows with others. Fifty years ago, no one thought twice about barring black and brown people from entering restaurants in the US. 'Woke' people changed those narratives, while many educated and 'rational' folk came up with a thousand reasons and excuses why the status quo was better. |
Nice try...
You are taking away credit from real fighters who fought those battles and giving it to a very different set of people. That is very unfair.
Did you know woke movement has roots in Marxism? In the 80s, Marxism was dealt a triple blow, USSR imploded, China became capitalist, and trade unions lost membership and clout significantly. So the ideologues of the Left in the academia changed the focus from "working class struggle" to "identity class struggle", and relaunched leftism with a new platform. Multiple books written by the left in the late 80s explicitly mention this makeover. When Marxism got a makeover and joined social justice moment, they brought the propaganda concept into it, where facts don't matter. That is how liberalism is now being linked to authoritative communism. It is all about group identity, and not about individuals.
It is very difficult to discuss this topic in detail without breaking Rule#13, so I will stop here. There are plenty of YT videos and books from renowned authors like Douglas Murray and John McWhorter, who discuss the enormous damage caused by the woke movement. I suggest you read/watch before passing judgement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashokrajagopal Elon Musk used an author's (Colin Wright) cartoon without attributing credit. Colin Wright minted an NFT out of it.
.
.
Yeah right, its the Left that has turned wild, Right is right there. |
I don't think anyone thought Elon Musk personally drew that pic. Who really gives image credit on social media... By tweeting that pic, it got the maximum exposure. Meanwhile someone replied to him with a more accurate image.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashokrajagopal All the web discussion on left vs right happens on the week when US Supreme court is drafting on overturning an abortion law from 50 years before. |
Horrible, I know.
But this item is too political to be discussed here.