Quote:
Originally Posted by thanixravindran ... one literally has to navigate multiple places to even get a past statement. ... when I made a FD, the FD advice email came after 10 days. |
I don't know yet if the Imperia interface would change things for the worse. However, with the regular interface I've had no issue with finding past statements easily enough. FD advices usually come by email within 2-3 days to me. In any case, they issue a temporary advice right away on opening an FD, so this is not a big issue for me. By contrast, Axis takes at least a day to make an advice available online. Email advices could take anything from 2-4 days to missing it altogether!
Quote:
On the contrary, I am at ease with ICICI Bank web interface...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chetan_Rao I agree with both bits, and precisely why I'm confused why you'd want to discard them.
.
ICICI's ... online banking channel is probably the most hassle-free I've experienced. I haven't had to call them on the phone for a few years now, and haven't had the misfortune of visiting them for several. I don't even remember when I last logged in via a laptop, the iMobile app does pretty much everything I need without fuss.
... ICICI has been the most 'just let me be' banker I've had so far. |
I'll discuss below why I won't consider ICICI. But first about the online experience (which is not a dealbreaker, BTW, but not a big enticement either. I'm glad that you guys are happy with it. But I believe it depends, at least to some extent, on what one gets used to first. I've been using HDFC netbanking for 10 years now. It works for me, mostly (I like SBI better).
ICICI online (exclusively on laptop) however, I never acquired a taste for! It feels too cluttered with 'ads' for their own products everywhere, like a minefield almost!
I signed up for monthly e-statements which I never receive for some reason! The ones I get to download from netbanking contain no useful information. Why even have them?! Thankfully date-range statements are available.
Credit card e-statements that I receive by e-mail can't be opened by their password clue for some reason! I've never gotten around to asking them to fix it, since I can download it via netbanking, which is an added hassle nonetheless.
Paying my credit card bill even from my own account is unnecessarily complicated, -- after everything else I have to finally input 3 pairs of numbers off three lettered boxes on the back of my debit card (which I have no other use for)! To make payments to my own card from my own SB account??? It is far too complicated even for making payments to third parties! What added security that other banks never felt any need for? So I ended up never using my ICICI SB account to make money transfers (i.e. basically never using the account)! I even pay my ICICI CC bills from third party apps now! Hassle free experience?! Any other bank, including HDFC, is superior in this respect! HDFC even have the smarts to not requiring an OTP if one needs to decrease third party transfer limits. Such small details do count.
Anyway, such varied experiences of members kind of sounds like the modern version of the story about blind people trying to describe an elephant
. Please don't get offended, - I'm one of them myself. Perhaps it stems from the semi-professional and rather non-uniform banking culture that is so prevalent in India. Even for one particular bank one's personal experience can depend to a significant degree on which particular branch one deals with at what point in time, who happened to be the branch head at that point, how experienced and influential s/he was in dealing with various different departments in the hierarchy of that particular bank ...
Even with netbanking, which particular aspects one has or has not faced with, whether one has faced some issues and how those were or were not resolved efficiently and effectively, and so on ...
It is kind of amusing how that KYC at ICICI thread has coincidentally come alive again! I must say, It doesn't go in favor of ICICI. However, I'll only recount my own experiences here, about how that particular bank deals with issues that may arise from time to time. The bank publishes some of their policies online. It's quite a different matter whether they live up to those in practice themselves!
1. A senior citizen in the family wanted to prematurely close an FD and reinvest at the current higher rate. The bank has a clear policy in this regard that is detailed on their website. However, their 'system' indicated an effective rate that was less than what it should have been according to their own premature withdrawal policy, and, consequently, an amount that was substantially less than what was expected! No, there was no scope of any miscalculation on our part. All it takes is a few minutes of one's time, but the branch head was adamant that their 'system' could not be wrong (apparently she has never heard of "garbage in, garbage out. The software, apparently, wasn't programmed right to make it consistent with their own rules!), and that we needed to write to the customer service, who would forward it in turn to the 'back end', and a turn around time could not be promised. All the while the FD holder will keep losing money at the much lower rate. Meanwhile, the FD has now run over to the next FY, with the added complication of the already compounded interest for the previous FY and the consequent tax payable.
2. I wanted to purchase RBI FRSBs online from ICICI. I followed the relevant links given on their website until I was required to check a box indicating I had read the relevant T&C. The corresponding link, however, pointed to no such thing! So, I was supposed to check the box blindly! The branch head was not of any help either. It later transpired that even checking that box would not allow one to purchase FRSBs online anyway, -- because apparently the Bank has purposely designed it not to work! Investments in Government accounts must not be remunerative enough for the private banks, so they don't make it easy. Online links are apparently just place holders designed never to work (it's the same story at Axis and at HDFC as well)! If customers absolutely insist, they can sometimes run down to a branch and be prepared to take the pain to open such accounts physically (as I was allowed to do at my ICICI branch). The Government, of course, can always brag that so many private banks are also offering these products!
3. ICICI have defined TRV on their website to consist of 'FDs' and 'Bonds/ Small Savings' amongst others. I had some money to invest in such products, and opened an FD and an RBI FRSB with them. I had more to invest, and asked for a clarification about my TRV status, only to find the Bank to be non-committal. The RM didn't know of course, and the branch head feigned not to know either, escalating my query. Later I was informed verbally that RBI Bonds were not included in TRV calculation! So "Bonds" actually excluded Government bonds!!! Then what about "Small Savings"? Are they not Government products as well?!
So I asked for written clarification from the customer service as well as the privilege banking support. For months my query was bounced around like a hot potato from one department to another (even to their RBI Bonds department! For TRV policy?!!!), only never to give me a simple clear written explanation of their own TRV policy! Eventually they fell completely silent, without answering my query!
I could have chosen to escalate it to the ombudsman in order to extract a written answer, but decided it was much easier to take my money elsewhere. ICICI ended up getting only a tiny fraction of what I had to invest at that point, and no hope of getting more business from me or my family in the foreseeable future! Indian businesses either don't realize that satisfied customers bring in more business, or they count on always having access to billions others that are less demanding and would not ask uncomfortable questions!
Be that as it may, I, for now, have decided to try out the premium banking version of a familiar evil, HDFC.
.