I ditto that Sir, as all the so called UV filters are basically meant for dust/dirt protection. As the dust settles on the lens surface most tend to use their hankie or the shirt end to clean the surface. This tends to have a sandpaper effect and the coating on the lens gets scratched etc. Most, don't realise this. Plonking a run of the mill filter is the best option for that and to save the expensive glass surface.
Now coming to the second point, the day I go in for a Hasselblad, Bronica or Mamiya in that order or for that matter 1DS MarkIII, will invest in one.. Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudra Sen Use that Kenko filter only as dust/dirt protection. Try to shoot without that as much as possible. Regular UV/Skylight/Haze filters are no match for modern optics. They tend to pull down their quality. If you really want to use a good protection filter, go for a good one. |
I would rather invest in a lens or for that matter a flash, than buying a 7-9K filter. BTW, the Hoya HMC Haze UV(0) - filter - UV - 72 mm for the 18-200mm Nikkor of my friend's costed a thou a few months back. Quote:
Originally Posted by phamilyman And the iceberg starteth.
PS: I need to dig up the cost of a Hoya 62 mm (?) CPL. I recall end Jun, Singapore had those items close to the 7-9k bracket! LOL: |
Last edited by gd1418 : 3rd November 2008 at 23:01.
|