Deepak,
My comment on certain officers, averse at the mention of wildlife photography and research, was based on a one to one interaction with them ( though Mr. Shankaran was kind enough to provide us with a tracker and allowed me to travel in our own vehicle on Gundem-Farahabad road) but their attitude in general is very hostile towards anyone seeking permission to explore or photograph Nallamalla.
My personal reasons are not confined only to photography.
We have just been to Karnataka where the forest department is very sucessfully managing the afffairs there in comparrision, Nagarahole is about 700 square kilometers and Nallamalla 3 558 Square kilometers, which means 5 times larger. I agree the weather and soil conditions there play a pivotal role in the condition of the forest, but here the other extreme of cattle and sheep grazing is increasing the disparity between these two forest's fast is getting wider and increasing.
The officers at Nagarhole, now and on our previous visits were welcomed us and we did spend money for every amenity provided, which was valuable earning for the department, this is just one instance....take Kanha, Corbet, Ranthamore, Kaziranga, Sunderbans etc. Do they all not earn domestic and foriegn revenue? See the success story in Africa, this money generated through eco, wildlife-tourism is pumped back in conservation. This is huge huge income which a forest can thrive due to the tourist-forest relationship.
Why not at NSTR (Srisailam)?
Why is the A.P.forest dept. stuck with. .. "keep everyone out" policy and what is the gain. It is a collosal loss! "DKG: One can argue that there is a downside to opening forests to tourists but I think its more dangerous to seal them off. ""
The above is a very experienced observation from you.
Illegal activities come down where tourist, photographers, researchers, (cited by you) resort owners working as sentinels as their survival depends on the tiger's and so many tribal youth employed in the chain of activities.
As the department lacks the required staff because it has not filled in the vacancies and the poor state of affairs with the 4th class employees in this department are pathetic, which takes them to the path of corruption and bribery.
Can anyone from the A.P. forest dept. justify their stand against eco, wildlife-tourist? Previously they had a legitimate reason of naxalite presence, what now?
Controlled and monitored wildlife, eco-tourism is possible (not what was started at Farahabad, it had become a zoo) Naxalites did the wildlife in that part a favour by blowing up the infrastructure.
Which forest in India has lost wildlife or habitat due to wildlife, eco-tourist?
Deepak, here I am not promoting wildlife, eco- tourism here, but my discussion is hinged on, why should the forest be totally closed to all with the exception of officials and political big wigs?
In 2002 tiger census, I know two persons who were participating in it and were driven off by the department guys although they were accompanied by forest staff...reason, they found a pug mark before the forest team arrived, the accompanying forest guard was mercilessly reprimanded and these two asked to leave immediately.
This is just a glimpse of their belligerent attitude which is in stark contrast to what we have seen elsewhere in India. There is much to keep under wraps.
In Panna, 3 years back there were 40 tigers and last month...NIL?
The true story is that there were never more than 10 tigers in Panna since the last 3 years, all of which were killed later, this news was out a year before it hit National headlines.
At NSTR, 2009 tiger census: 81 tigers. This is fraud!! There are no more than 20 tigers. In the coming years NSTR will meet the same fate as Sariska and Panna, and the papers will read 81 tigers to NIL, first of all who is monitoring the figures presented by the forest department?, their obsolete and unscientific method of count by pugmark cast is wronged by many wildlife experts world wide and also by the World Bank.
There is a definite downside if the forest is thrown open to public like you mentioned, as it is, the traffic on the highway has killed many animals who crisscross the highway moving through the forest corridor.
You have proposed many workable rehab programmes for tribals, and also long term solutions are afforestation (CAMPA fund realesed by the supreme court for this purpose on 8th July 09 is Rs.11,000 crores, A.P."s share 897 crores.) us this judiciously, equip the forest staff and give them incentives, be honest in tiger census by sincerely involving individuals, NGO's, create ways to generate employment, create income to self sustain expenditures.
And so on . A forest takes centuries to come into existence, but can be decimated to a barren land in just a few years.
Regards,
Last edited by fazalaliadil : 21st July 2009 at 17:31.
Reason: grammar, of course.
|