[shivshanker]

Originally Posted by mayankk

Shiv, at a base level, this pragmatism is what frank should practise, agreed.
But what everyone here is against is the condoning of the drunkard, as a wayward incident.

Equating bigger crimes, and crimes injustices dont matter a hoot.
Its his car, it has been bashed up, and so I expect him to get resolution in this situation first, and not go about a list of things like
1.remove corruption, 2.Resolve political deadlocks, 3. remove poverty...........X. fix car.

@iLuvcars & MayanKK

My longish explanation was to state that drunken driving is indeed an offense, but when the doc has pleaded guilty, it is best we move on, as I mentioned earlier. Rather than keep demanding an action against the Doc.

The idea was not to highlight nor divert the topic, but to highlight that we do not live in a perfect black and white world.

There are different shades of grey in this world.