Road humps - A substitute for traffic law enforcement? I searched the forum for road humps and could not find a thread specific to this topic, though there were threads on ground clearance.
How often have we winced after crossing a speed breaker? Issues like safety, discomfort to the driver and damage to the vehicle are given least regard while constructing one.
What can we do about this? Whom to complain? Are there better alternatives? Can RTI act come to our rescue? Rules
IRC:99-1988 - Tentative Guidelines on the Provision of Speed Breakers for Control of Vehicular Speeds on Minor Roads stipulates that a road hump should conform to the following dimensions: Height of 12.5 Cms, width of 200 cms and radius of 4 M.
Hump should be stripped in white, well maintained and warning signs for speed breakers should be provided at a prescribed distance. Speed breakers should be constructed with hot pre-mix bituminous material, well compacted after laying on well prepared surface. Rationale
Roads are designed for specific speeds at which vehicles can travel with comfort and safety. However, at certain locations such as approaches to manned and unmanned level crossings, sharp curves, congested or accident-prone locations, and residential streets, additional control of speed may be necessary to ensure safety. This is achieved through several ways such as posting mandatory speed limit signs, use of flashing beacons to alert drivers, and road markings. In certain situations, road humps are required, but they are meant only for residential areas and minor roads. Their use on major roads is not considered good engineering practice and the IRC guideline explicitly discourages it.
The IRC guidelines stipulate that there should be no damage to vehicles or excessive discomfort to drivers/passengers when crossing the speed breaker at the designated speed; the driver should suffer a higher level of discomfort when he goes over the speed breaker above the speed stipulated by the authorities; and the driver should not lose directional control of the vehicle when crossing the speed breaker. It has been empirically determined that to meet these requirements, the speed breaker must have a width larger than the wheelbase of the vehicles. The IRC guidelines also stipulate where road humps should be placed and it is clearly stated that when a minor road crosses a major road, the speed breaker should be on the minor road about 10 meters from the intersection. Failed alternative
Karnataka State Government Order dated April 5, 1997, sought to replace all road humps on Public Works Department (PWD) roads with rumbler strips (a group of 15 to 20 small humps, each 20 cm wide and 2 cm high and separated from each other by 15 cm) of uniform design. This was perceived to be misguided as the stipulated crossing speeds for vehicles plying over the rumbler strips is very low and a majority of two-wheeler drivers tend to lose control over the vehicle causing accidents. |