Re: Ola Cab catches fire in Delhi Too many issues being mixed up.
I am not clear in what way people want the law to have more teeth in these matters. Loss to life and limb is covered by vehicle insurance. Mental trauma of surviving an accident is not. Moreover, mental trauma could arise out of many business transactions and aggregators do not carry out any specific activity that makes their services more prone to it. This can only be handled through the court and if the lady so wishes then she should. Existing provisions of law allow such cases to be admitted. The only additional teeth I can think of is to force cabs to prominently display a valid insurance certificate.
On 3rd August 2016 an Emirates flight from Trivandrum crash landed at Dubai airport. All passengers made it out of the aircraft alive. Emirates paid USD 7,000 to every passenger as compensation for mental trauma, even though it’s legal obligation was USD 1,750 towards loss of baggage. This earned them lot of love from the passengers. A company can choose not to receive such love from its customers and restrict compensation to what is ‘legal’. But to equate this choice to an unethical business practice is something I do not agree with.
I really wish top Indian unicorns led the way in setting examples for even foreign companies, but as V. Narayan sir has rightly said, they are chasing very different goals.
Carrying out regular checks to ensure that cabs are mechanically well maintained is a good business practice but has little to do with law. If this was to be enforced by law, it would require an army of inspectors and we would still be arguing over what is the most suitable inspection interval. We need to leave it to aggregators to self regulate themselves, which brings me to the issue of trust.
A lot has been said about ‘trust in the brand’. I trust Ola and Uber to 1) get me a cab within the promised time, 2) for their payment system to work properly, and 3) if there is minor problem then for their customer support to act timely. That is all. I have absolutely no faith that somehow their cars are inherently safe, their drivers protective angels and that they can resolve serious grievances satisfactorily. How on earth can anyone who has used cabs frequently believe that cabs are well maintained? It is so apparent that they are not. We still use them because we choose to ignore these deficiencies for practical concerns. But when something bad happens, we claim that our ‘trust has been broken’. We are lying only to ourselves. |