Quote:
Originally Posted by ebonho I for one definitely want the 690, and need the 690. I got bored pretty quickly of the tame 390 |
I agree with you on that Doc. Now that brings a thought to me. I have read scores of threads where the rider rants about his ride being slow and how he is dying to lay his hands on a 650cc or a 800cc or a litre bike and also how the 30 or 40 HP is not thrilling enough and the holy grail is definitely over triple digit HPs or whatever is the fastest on the road today. I have had my fair share of rant too.
Now the question to all is. what ever you may be riding, may be a CBR 250 or a Ninja 250 or a Pulsar 220 or a Duke 390. Have you really exploited your bike to the fullest in terms of speed, handling and in all possible ways before saying "I have no more to exploit with this bike. I have extracted the max possible from it and there is no more juice left and I need to move on".
I for one am an average rider. never did daring (read reckless) speeds on my Pulsar earlier and there were many better riders in my group who could ride faster and handle the bike better ( be it cornering or braking). So that means I still had a lot to learn and exploit and extract from my Pulsar. But I was only a mediocre rider doing some occasional bursts of high speed on straight roads and gloating over it and considered myself a complete rider and I need an upgrade. I never exploited or extracted the fullest from any of my earlier rides or drives for that matter.
Now my 390. I have done some decent distance and speeds but no where have I fully exploited the 390. I bet many of the riders haven't done that. I agree we have had our moments on road, but a 390 is a very superior machine and a lot can be done on this bike. I am yet to master my 390 in terms of handling it or taking the best out of her, but then I start salivating on the Hastur or 690 or a N650 thinking ..wow. that is 70HP top speed is 200 Kmph wow and I NEED IT.
A rider who could not fully 100% exploit / extract from his Pulsar 180 (I am speaking of me) is now dreaming of owning a 650 / 690 cc bike and what then. Again I might do an occasional burst of high speed on a straight road, over take some lesser mortals, gloat over my bike, it's performance and consider myself a biker. the one thing I feel is I will become a lazy biker as I progress higher up as I really don't need to work hard or sweat any more and a mere blip of the throttle can push all the lesser mortals and lesser Gods on their 250's 390s in to oblivion. So does that mean my skills are better or that I am extracting the max from my new machine or I am a better rider?
The other day a friend of mine from Bangalore who had ridden down to Goa for IBW was telling me that his Suzuki bandit is slow and he wants to sell it and upgrade to a much faster bike and I was wondering like -Man has this guy has really mastered the bandit in all possible ways that the bike has to offer or one of his friends on a Busa over took him at one of the rare straight stretches on the highway which made him to comment that his Bandit was slow. and at KTM Orange day at Goa, a couple of months back there were lot of participants enthusiastic ( some without proper gear, but that is another matter) with their 390s and I was surprised at the way many rode their bikes. The Orange day was essentially a skill test and some had no idea what they were doing on the track. some could not negotiate simple turns, there were a couple of crashes, no leaning, braking, entry/exit errors and such aspects. So the point is there is so much to learn, to understand. to practise, to improve before we really master our 390 and then it kinda of gets boring ( as Doc said) and then you know, it is time to look out for an upgrade.
The question that arises is how a progression / upgrade should really be? should it be influenced by peers? should it be influenced by a bigger bike in the market? Questions are plenty. and I started to realise that I have a long way to go with my 390 before I can even say that " Yes. I am done with 390. there is nothing more in any possible way this bike can offer me than which I have extracted and grown over. Now I am ready for the progression. I am ready for the next upgrade". But as I said earlier, upgrade removes all the fun as a slight blip is all that is needed higher up there and there is not much learning (except to blip sensibly) and even I may not need to change the gear too as first and second gears are more than enough to squash any challenge.
If all I want is to beat the next guy from signal to signal, do I need a bigger bike? I could be a better rider on my existing bike for that purpose. If I want to just pose with a bigger bike and I have the dough, then it is a totally different matter ( they are a different breed of riders), so I need to ask why do I need another extra 20 or 40 horses under me? what am I going to do with it?
But Doc. I agree that you need an upgrade because I know you have extracted every possible ounce of power from your 200 and also exploited all her handling / braking prowess. You are one dude ready for a 690.
while most of us (including me) can do (should do) with our existing rides and learn to exploit them to the max. May be some time in distance, I may say that " Yes Now I am ready"