Team-BHP > Technical Stuff
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
47,967 views
Old 17th July 2017, 23:26   #16
Team-BHP Support
 
Rehaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 24,039
Thanked: 34,069 Times
Re: 2017 ground clearance update - ARAI now measuring GC with laden weight

What kind of additional weight are we talking about for "laden" weight?

I assume it's something like 4 passengers @ 65 kg / person or something like that?
Rehaan is offline  
Old 18th July 2017, 20:19   #17
BHPian
 
narendra.vw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bangaloru
Posts: 293
Thanked: 425 Times
Re: 2017 ground clearance update - ARAI now measuring GC with laden weight

My observation,
The GC changes drastically having all four individual suspension with respect to weight added.
In particular having coil springs.

The GC of rigid Diff with leaf spring remains almost the same.
narendra.vw is offline  
Old 21st July 2017, 14:25   #18
BHPian
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Jamshedpur
Posts: 210
Thanked: 480 Times
Re: 2017 ground clearance update - ARAI now measuring GC with laden weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rehaan View Post
What kind of additional weight are we talking about for "laden" weight?

I assume it's something like 4 passengers @ 65 kg / person or something like that?
Every manufacturer needs to provide Type Approval Certificates to the competent Government authorities. In that certificate Gross Vehicle Weight is mentioned against a given model. So, no need of anyassumption. One example is attached below for Tata Hexa Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) herewith.

Thanks,
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Cir2017751098.pdf (3.02 MB, 448 views)
kbishwa is offline   (1) Thanks
Old 21st July 2017, 17:07   #19
BHPian
 
FarPatel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 247
Thanked: 328 Times
Re: 2017 ground clearance update - ARAI now measuring GC with laden weight

Quote:
Originally Posted by volkman10 View Post
ARAI spells out the new ground clearance norms. Measurements will now be taken with a fully laden vehicle, as against the earlier condition of an unladen vehicle.
I believe that the lowermost components of most cars are the bottom supports of the rear shocks and these would normally lie outside the 80% boundaries specified by ARAI. So my logical mind would say that the absolute lowermost points should be considered, since these would be more liable to be damaged by stray rocks etc. rather than other, higher placed parts. The ARAI specs may be useful when considering the ability of the vehicle to cross speedbreakers without scraping the underbody but not when you suddenly come across a concrete block in your path, left behind by an improperly cleared construction activity.
I know, it happened to me.

Last edited by Rehaan : 21st July 2017 at 17:44. Reason: Fixing quote
FarPatel is offline   (1) Thanks
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks