re: Engine Failure in BMW X5 | Highway Driven only for 1,30,000 km | EDIT: Being repaired under warranty We (Venkat and I) visited the service center yesterday;
Observations made after dismantling the engine. The following detail was compiled by Venkat to avoid any ambiguity in technical word usage.
1) The 3rd cylinder in the engine had a piston freeze.
V: This made no sense and was confirmed when we saw things for ourselves. The piston did not look deformed enough to get stuck in the cylinder. At most, there might have been carbon deposits above the top ring that didn't let the piston pop out of the cylinder easily.
2) The piston (in the 3rd cylinder) is bent.
V: Pistons don't bend; they crack. No idea what BMW meant by this either.
3) The cylinder inner surface is clean (wonder how!)
V: Because the piston and connecting rod were fine, there was no scoring that took place.
4) The connecting rod bearing(s) are broken
V: Constant friction between the bearing shell and crank pin started peeling layers off the bearing until all the soft material on the bearing was destroyed, and the final steel backing layer was exposed, at which point the crankshaft started taking damage and the extreme heat generated as a result of this friction turned the rod big end blue. If one were to take a bore gauge and check the big end assembly, they'd find it to be not round anymore since the heat warped the bore. The crankshaft, of course, is scrap now.
5) The engine oil tested had metal content in it.
V: From all the metal being shed by the above mentioned process.
Additional observations (Venkat):
1. The bearing shells are around 1.5mm thick. Erosion of that material effectively added another 1.5mm in stroke to the piston. Since this is a diesel with a completely flat head and minimal clearance between the head surface and the piston top, an extra 1.5mm in stroke caused the piston to make contact with the head and it is evident because the cylinder in question has the usual carbon deposit knocked out. However, since this happened at low engine speeds and the car was immediately shut down as soon as the noise was heard, there was no lasting damage to the piston or head. Prolonged contact would certainly have shattered the piston and the resulting pieces would have scored everything they touched on their way down. Luckily for the block and head, that didn't happen.
2. Rod bearings from all other cylinders except one also had very clear signs of scoring on them. This points to a general lubrication problem, and has absolutely nothing to do with how the car was driven over its life. Everybody here uses BMW LL-04 spec oil because it keeps the DPF happy. What they seem to be missing or ignoring is the fact that BMW itself forbids the use of LL-04 outside EU since the oil cannot effectively protect against sulfur contaminants in fuel outside EU. Add to this the fact that they stretch the change intervals (it's in the name, after aLL), the engine sees accelerated wear and tear. Even my F10 530d that was serviced regularly at BMW with their own recommended oil has a bunch of blow by and uneven compression across the board when I bought it at 80K. The biggest favor I did to it was to throw the DPF as far as I could and switch to LL-01, which is a much superior lubricant and protectant. A lot of other manufacturers seem to have recognized this issue and delete DPFs from their cars before they launched them into the Indian market, but BMW chose not to. As a result, people have to choose between accelerated engine wear to preserve their warranty and keep "upgrading" every 3 years or so, or risk losing their warranty to keep their engines healthy and hold on to their cars as long as possible. This is planned obsolescence at its finest.
This claim is further bolstered by the fact that my good friend Joe AKA @swiftboost has two of the same engines sitting at his place in Kochi that have suffered identical failures at a similar mileage. This is in addition to all the indirect information out there on forums across the world.
Parts Replacement proposed by BMW:
1) Replacement of piston and connected accessories in the 3rd cylinder
V: Absolutely not. BMW's own TIS forbids replacing a single connecting rod since all six rods are weight matched and balanced before assembly. Replacing a single rod will introduce an imbalance that will cause further problems down the line, and completely destroy the smooth, creamy nature of these I6s that we have come to love.
2) Connecting rod and bearings to be replaced.
V: Agreed
3) Crank shaft itself to be replaced
V: Agreed
4) Engine oil pump & filter to be replaced to clear metal debris
V: Agreed
5) Turbo to be replaced as there is possibility of metal debris in it.
V: This might be unnecessary since the metal debris was caught in the oil filter and didn't propagate downstream. However, removal of the turbo could have caused some carbon deposits around the turbine shaft to dislodge and potentially cause lubrication problems if the turbo is reused. So this is 50 / 50.
Additional comments (Venkat):
At this point, the only things salvageable from the entire debacle are the head assembly and block castings. They absolutely *must* replace the crank, oil pump, 6 connecting rods, 12 rod bearing shells, 14 main bearing shells and every single high tensile bolt holding the engine together that they undid.
Even though they said they'd throw a set of new rings on the pistons and shove them right back in, this is unacceptable because the bores are completely glazed as after all this usage, and if the piston to bore clearances aren't out of spec already, they will be once the bores are rehoned. Honing is NOT optional because new rings will not seat otherwise. Properly addressing this situation will now require a full set of 1st oversize pistons and rings (+.25mm), an appropriate rebore and a proper honing job. That adds 6 pistons and basically a new block to the already significant list of parts above.
With this laundry list of parts that need to be replaced, it would be simpler for BMW to just issue a half engine assembly instead, as is the norm everywhere *except* India where they seem to have a very low opinion of their customers' intelligence.
We made it crystal clear to the RM there that nothing less than a replacement block or a properly rebuilt block with oversize pistons would be an acceptable resolution. This isn't about what's cheap or convenient, but what's right, and if BMW have any sense of pride in their brand, they'll do things the right way instead of issuing band aid solutions that directly contradict the instructions in their own service manual.
This car was never molested at any point in its life, and this isn't even remotely the customer's problem. All responsibility of making this situation right rests squarely on BMW's shoulders. The half measures they are currently proposing will completely destroy any sense of confidence the customer will have in the car, and pretty much guarantee premature problems very soon down the line.
I'm sure the "technical head" who is pushing this so called solution would not perform the same thing on his own BMW if it failed similarly. For their own sake, I hope BMW see the light and do what's right by the customer. |