Quote:
Originally Posted by sgiitk Thanks for confirming my point - I always call the Santro / i10 AT as a 3+1 and not a true four speed. Using an OD button to add a gear has its problems, the most notable being that you do not get engine braking until you hit 2. Most unfortunate if you have to go downhill for a considerable distance. |
I admit to being confused by this. If there are 4 discreet ratios, its a true 4 speed, regardless of how the ratios are selected.
you don't use the OD button to "add" a gear. you use it to lock out the highest ratio, this is primarily done for uphill sections. Going uphill, an automatic can start "hunting". It'll rev up in 3rd and decide it can shift up so it does. then it finds 4th inadequate, so it shifts down, and the cycle repeats over and over, 3-4-3-4-3-4-3. To stop this from happening, the O/D off switch is provided.
It can also be used to provide engine braking, by forcing the transmission to stay out of 4th, but pressing a button is no different from moving the lever from D to 3.
In fact, D,2,1 + O/D switch is EXACTLY the same situation as a D,3,2,1
If you're going to need 2nd gear to provide engine braking, you'll need to move the lever to "2" in both cases.
4 speed with O/D is not 3+1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joslicx Well Harbir the point is Hyundai is able to sell i20 as a premium hatch (and for a premium price) while a premium company like Honda is not!
Traditionally people in India have willingly paid premium prices to own Hondas. I was just wondering what went wrong with the Jazz. I agree with you that Jazz is far more sophisticated than the i20. But that should have meant that the premium hatch market should have lapped it by doves like i20. But that didnt happen.
I think the biggest culprit is Hondas themselves. They hardly advertise it (looks like they dont want to sell it!!!). And the lack of an AT in Jazz is very much telling. An AT Jazz (like the one on City) would have helped it sell a bit more. I'd have bought it instead of the Vento if it was available! |
The jazz didn't do well because its high import content made it a very pricey car for a 1.2L hatchback, about 8lacs OTR, and people didn't like its unusual looks. Just around the time Honda made the move to reduce price with greater localization, Honda's parts supply operation in Thailand was hit by floods, disrupting producing and stretching jazz waiting lists to 8 months plus.
The i20 is localized and therefore in the price range that Indians consider appropriate for cars of this class.
Honda eventually got the production of the Jazz going again, but production remains low and waiting lists remain. I suspect that its because Honda cannot make much money on the car at the low price because it is inherently a superior car to the i20 and costs more money to make, but if it has to be sold at the same price, it won't make enough money and it remains logical for Honda to use its capacity to manufacture the Brio instead which can generate much larger volumes.
By the way, I drove from Chandigarh to delhi yesterday and kept a look out on all the i20s I saw. they were all Magna or Sportz, no Asta. Most were CRDI and I didn't see any Sportz Petrol. I would say the number of petrol i20s around 6lacs price point on the road is a smallish fraction of the i20 sales.