Quote:
Originally Posted by Tejas@perioimpl alankarm,
Firstly, i sympathize with your accidents and damages. Try to be a bit more careful next time.
Secondly, your title is misleading and wrong. All new cars have this kind of bumpers. They are designed to collapse so that the shock is not transfered to the occupants in case of an accident. You must definitely have heard of crumple zones.
I also own an i10 and my dad has been rear-ended and we changed the bumper. You need to live with it. There are so many fools who put bull bars in front and back of their vehicles. This will prevent damage to bumpers during minor bangs, but during a major crash, the entire force will go to the chassis and the crumple zones will not work.
Coming back to the topic, all cars have this single piece bumper to conform with safety rules. Remember, most manufacturers sell the same car in many countries. Thus, it is not possible to have multiple designs for a same product. Thus, they will confirm to the country which is strictest. And frankly, i'd rather pay for a broken bumper than a broken back.
Go to you tube and search for videos showing crashes with and without crumple zones. You will know what advantages these "FLIMSY" bumpers have. |
Again, my point seems to be not understood!! If you read carefully, I am never talking about the bumper, but the frame on which everything is fixed, (The huge ORNAMENTAL bumper, the chrome plated and the black grills, the head lights, the radiator assembly with fan, the AC condenser and what not, everything is fixed on this).
This is a SINGLE piece (WHY?) of FLIMSY plastic.
I am of the opinion that this could have been made in multiple parts of metal (like the earlier ones), with some sort of retainers or rivets which break on a certain level of impact, so as to let the frame collapse. This will make the frame more rigid (for car safety also) and also repairable.
Definitely more ECO friendly and pocket friendly too. (But perhaps not Car dealer's margin friendly?).
With today's technologies in alloys and plastics, these should not be a problem, and should take care of the pedestrian safety too. It is only a matter of thinking of the owner of the car's expenses (Insurance is not an end all). Why replace at great expense, when it can be repaired at little expense?
Another thing, I happen to own a CIVIC too. With the American/European design requirements (as you say), this should be a most pedestrian unfriendly car. It has been reversed into with perhaps more force than I have seen the i10 experiencing -- the only damage -- a dent in the Civic's bumper, easily repaired and painted. Or is it that with more expensive cars the pedestrian safety is thrown out of the windows?? Why are they so much better built?
Hyundai is and probably will remain a CHEAP car maker compared to European/Japanese carmakers of the similar category cars. Yes cheaper and lower quality too.
They will sell more, be respected for their earnings and growth, but the quality of parts remains farrrrrrrrr behind Europeans and even the Japanese.