Quote:
Originally Posted by DeKay Let's say your 3GT is 10/10 on the following aspects, what would you rate the Meridian? Solely compared to the 3GT:
Interior Build Quality -
Interior Plushness -
High speed stability-
Ride quality -
NVH - |
Hard to put this in numbers since it might require context given different segments, body type etc so please allow me to respond to this in descriptive fashion instead:
Interior Build Quality:
I think build quality is best judged with the test of time so its impossible to give an apples to apples comparison with a 2 week ownership vs 6.5 years ownership. The BMW build has been spectacular and its aged brilliantly. People are shocked when they hear its a 6.5 year old car. The car feels as tight as it did in its first year and body parts have largely remained of a high order of quality. An exception to this is some of the side door handles which have blackened with age and I had to replace - apparently a very common issue with these BMWs.
The Jeep feels and looks built to as high a standard on the face of it but like I said, its the test of time that will be the true judge of this. Some stalks are definitely not as universally rich as in the BMW, like indicator stalks, the knob that adjusts the headrests in the middle row etc. These are however outliers.
Subject to my time test input: if the BMW is a 10, the Meridian is an 8.
Interior Plushness:
Similar to BMW for most part. In fact some of the leather on the dash etc actually gives it a plusher look as does the overall moonroof impact.
10/10 for both I’d say when I average the pros and cons out.
High speed stability:
One’s a monocoque SUV and the other a RWD BMW and one of the best handling brands even within the halo’d Germans. Without giving the Jeep a handicap for distinct body styles etc, if the BMW is a 10 then the Meridian is a 7.5.
Ride quality:
The Meridian definitely pitches a lot more at slow city speeds in potholes, road bumps etc than the 3GT, thanks to the different body styles. But the trade off is that at higher speeds, where I am a bit more careful with bumps and bad roads in the 3GT, the Meridian dispatches these with aplomb when the car is moving fast. So pros and cons in different situations.
If the BMW gets a 10 here then the Meridian perhaps is a 9.5. Again, I’m struggling to mark this evenly to be honest so please take the number rating with a pinch of salt, because both come with pros and cons in different situations.
NVH
The 2.0 litre diesels in the Germans are actually a tad gruff, specially of that generation, compared to their 3.0 litre counterparts and even compared to newer iterations of the same 2.0 engines. However, my 3GT engine has become even smoother post my remap which took it to ~225 bhp.
However, the Meridian too is REALLY smooth for a diesel and its NVH in particular is extremely well managed. The only scenario in which NVH could be felt is when you’re pushing the engine really hard (given its engine / gearbox tuning issue) whereas in contrast the BMW just never feels strained regardless of how hard you’re pushing it.
NVH in ordinary conditions:
If BMW is a 10, then the Meridian is a 9.5 maybe. I’d make it an 8.5 if you take into account high strain conditions where some engine noise starts creeping in.
____
I’ve tried to answer this for the sake of providing an answer but its hard to provide a perfect comparison given the dramatic difference in the two vehicles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaiusPitar I am looking to upgrade from my EcoSport a few months down the line. The Meridian gave me a wow feeling which I didnt get in any SUV this side of 50 Lakhs. So I am going to follow your updates to understand your perspectives as it evolves. |
Thank you. I plan to keep this thread very regularly updated to objectively lay out all experiences, observations and opinions and I’ll be only too happy if it helps owners and prospective customers to make their decision - whether in favour of it or even against it, depending on the priorities that matter to each one.
For your use case, and given you’re in NCR, I guess the Kodiaq should also be on your shortlist for sure - it feels as plush if not plusher and is a very modern sophisticated offering this side of 50L. On that front, the Meridian is definitely not a class of 1. It’d be a three way pit between the VAG twins and the Jeep I suppose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteKnight The spare wheel looks disappointing in Meridian. While Compass S gets 17 inch spare, it is a full size tyre with same width and H speed rating instead of V. The compromise on Meridian could be due to the way the tyre is stored? (underbody access compared to boot access on compass). Only issue I found was that the tyre pressure system goes for a toss once on spare.
The tyre pressure monitor itself is very accurate. I have checked it using cross calibration with the one in Shell fuel pump over multiple iterations. Found that it displays 1 pound less consistently vs the meter at the specific fuel station. |
The spare wheel factor is indeed very annoying, which is why in my list of cons, specially for a 4x4 vehicle that you’re well likely to take on particular hard terrain. Good to know the accuracy of the TPMS. Its the same with the FE sensor - ludicrously accurate between MID readout and tank to tank. I got 7 kmpl on my second fill measuring via both methods. Mostly city usage. Just under 40 litres filled. I’m finding the tank range a tad annoying at these numbers given I’ve been properly spoilt with the low fuel refill frequency in my 3GT. Perhaps its a slightly larger tank combined with reasonably better FE too. I’m really hoping the FE improves because cost aside, I don’t like the logistics of planning unduly frequent fill ups.
Quote:
Last but not the least, overall refinement and response has gotten better post 5000 kms. You may experience the same. Things would only get better !!!
|
I have heard exactly the same with my Compass owning friends and am hoping it will be much the same with my Meridian.
Thanks all once again to all for taking the time to read the longish review.
Cheers.