(The cars tested belonged to our relatives, so no pics are taken to maintain privacy respect. Pics from the net for comparison purposes and accessories shown need not necessarily be a part of standard equipment.
Actual cars may vary depending upon market requirements.) Looks and Styling:
Hyundai I10: 7 /10
Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
None of these cars are good lookers, but since cost pressure dictates limited styling scope, both these cars are now acceptable looking, more so when we see a lot of them on our roads.
Hyundai's I10, launched in fall 2007, was born in Hyundai's Namyang design studios in Seoul, designed completely in house by its designers and as a result, the car is actually one of the better designed hyundais, especially compared to the overtly creased and curved Santro.
The front end with its triangular headlights looks particularly striking and gels well with the kinked bumper and superbly integrated air-dam.
The grill, inspired by civic, looks decent and gives the I10 some street presence, expected from a kei-car. The sides also look decent, if somewhat bland with the kink on the bottom of the rear window giving it loads of character.
The rear is plain and flat and obviously resembles the original santro which created a lot of debates when it was launched in 1998.
However, the design is superbly integrated and all curves seem to gel with each other. A neat touch is the detachable plastic mounding in both the bumpers which protect you against minor side bruises and reduces the cost of bumper repair, but it makes the car look a bit over styled.
However, after 2 years and more than 1,50,000 cars roaming in our roads, it has become a common sight and it now looks a bit bland.
A refresh is on the cards but wont happen before mid 2010 at the earliest.
In comparision, Maruti's Ritz does have some glitz from the front and sides at least. For a car of this size and footprint, it looks imposing and its I20-like headlights and Audi-like grill with the big "S" logo gives it some kind of road prescence that makes the I10 look wimpy and feminine in comparision. Dark colours suit the ritz better and it gives it some character aided by clean styling from the front 3 quarters, matured without any creases and curves, and the large side windows give it character.
However, all's well dos not necessarily end well as the rear end does not gel well with the rest of the car's design and it looks as if the designers were playing football at the lunchtime and accidentally kicked at the rear end of the mocked up clay model(!), leading to this shape.Point lost for it.
Either love it or hate it.
The rear taillights do their best to reduce the visual bulk but sadly, the rear looks out of sync and proportion to the superbly designed front. Build Quality:
Hyundai I10: 7 /10
Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
The Hyundai is definitely better built since the car is exported globally from here and quality conscious European market demands are very high in terms of build, fit and finish and Hyundai does feel well screwed and put together.
Owners have also given positive feedback to the body which remains relatively rattle free after usage over thousands of kilometers over our rough roads. The panel gaps, shut lines and even nuts and bolts, both inside and outside, have a quality feel to it so does the superb paint job. For the asking price, fit and finish is excellent and you do get an impression of "bang for the buck" factor.
Though the Ritz is a relatively a new product and its too early to comment on the build quality, it does feel better built than other marutis.
However, fit and finish, especially of some interior plastics feels low rent as compared to I10 and the rubber beadings feel downmarket due to heavy localization and mass production to keep up with the high demand.
paint job, though is superb and the panel gaps are consistent save for the boot lid which feels a bit misaligned.
Also, the way the doors shut on the ritz does not inspire confidence as compared to the I10, which feels well screwed together.
However, keep in mind that these cars are built to bean counter regulations so do not expect fiat levels of solidity. |