Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBeastFieast Thanks Kalyan, I know my reactions were sharp but just didnt wanted something wrong happening with our T-BHP member. |
My pleasure. Sharp reactions are the need of the hour in cases like these since my review was effecting other T-BHPian's(Fstlndrive) decisions too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBeastFieast BTW, congrats on your car and thanks for the nice review.
I was also confused between Fiesta and ANHC and as you rightly wrote, Fiesta feels more in control while ANHC gives a feel of big car and initially there are worries of handling (might be due to I drive a small car - Zen at this time). |
Thanks for the wishes and compliments on the review. Well, after a month's ownership, I can just say that the 'big' car feeling lasts for a week at most and then you are used to it. Driving the ANHC is a real pleasure and handling the car is not an issue at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBeastFieast But yes both of them are gems and in my case its heart (ANHC) over head (Fiesta) because of only 2 reasons.
1.) Peace of mind as I will have it at least for 6-7 years.
2.) I am going for Automatic, (Again peace of mind as my wife would be able to drive that which will give more peace). |
I couldn't agree more when you say both of them are gems. Driving the AT version of the ANHC will be a pleasure in itself(with the paddle shifts). Congratulation on the decision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vvrchandra Kalyan, I also bought a ANHC this month and am planning to get the sun films once the registration is done. How do you think the RE series compete when compared with 3M CS or other 3M series. |
Congratulations on your new car, Sir. Driving an AT must be an experience in itself.
I cannot tell the difference between the different 3M series sun control films (physically). I can only tell you why I chose the films for my car in this manner:
1. 3M CR 70 for the front windscreen
2. 3M RE 50 for the sides
3. 3M RE 70 for the rear windscreen
As per RTA regulations in Hyderabad, we can only chose films with 70% or more 'Visible Light Transmission(VLT)' for the front and the rear windscreens. We can chose films with 50% or more VLT for the sides.
(IMHO)Front screen is the most important part because the heat from the front is a lot effective as most of the times it directly effects the vision and also the AC cooling. So, I chose CR70 for the front windscreen, as though the VLT for this film is 70%, the percentage of solar energy rejected is very high at 50%. This is a bit expensive and costed me Rs 5500.00.
For the sides, CR did not fit my budget so I compared the solar energy rejected figures between RE, CS and SP series and noticed the following:
1. RE 50 (43%)
2. CS 50 (33%)
3. SP 50 (29%)
The UV reduction(98-99%) and VLT were similar for all the three. CS and RE costs the same and have a 3 year warranty so I chose RE 50 for the sides. Similarly, I chose RE 70 for the rear as the solar energy rejected(34%) in this case was the highest. The sides and the rear costed me Rs 3600.00.
One important point to note would be that RE is a premium metallised series and therefore there might be an interference with satellite signals like the cellphones, etc. CS series description mentions that there is zero interference with signals. But, 3M does not have a film with 70% VLT in the CS series so ideally there is no film for rear windscreen in the CS series.
Listed below is the technical description of each of 3M series sun control film and their respective warranty. You may want to read the description and compare what suits your car the best.
3M SP series (
3M India: Executive) - 2 year warranty
3M CS series (
3M India: CS Series) - 3 year warranty
3M RE series (
3M India: RE Series) - 3 year warranty
3M CR series (
3M India: Choose your film) - 5 year warranty
Quote:
Originally Posted by vvrchandra I would like to see your vehicle once, regarding the shades. Thanks in advance. |
My pleasure, Sir. I have PMed you my cellphone number, you may call me anytime and we can schedule a meet.