Thanks Yakuza, the 185/65 seems to be more recommended than 185/60 - although the speedometer error increases to +2.1% from -0.9%. I guess both of these are well under control but guess with 185/65 I will get some additional ground clearance so that should be better.
The 185 clearly seems to be winning against the 195 for now.
I guess the problem to solve for now is the tyre make, as Michelins are out of stock (atleast in Bombay) due to import issues and guess not back in stock for another month.
Would appreciate help now on other tyre brands and reasons for preferring those - as my research was primarily focused on Michelins so far
Dealers are out of stock of Michelins in Mumbai due to import issues
Now which one would you recommend?
Also a dealer recommend going for 185/65/15 vs 195/60/15 stating that my car is 5 years old and the shock ups might not be able to sustain. Also there might be issues on bumps - can you please also advise on the same
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakuza Get 185/65/15. Mileage drop will be negligible, will fit perfect on your steel wheels and will give you better ride quality. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by pavi I would vote for Michelin XM2, been using it for more than 41,000 kms and I have only praises for Michelin. I have 195/60/15 section tires and the improvement in ride comfort, noise reduction, braking etc. are considerably good that the higher prices are justified.
If you have already bought tires, please let us know which one you went for. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Su-47 |
Wow, fantastic review, thanks for this - you have me convinced on 195/60/15. Just need some advice here
A dealer told me given I have steel wheels, any upgrade whether 185 or 195 will not prove its purpose hence I should stick to the stock 175/65/15 wheels even if I want new tyres
Dealers are out of stock of Michelins in Mumbai due to import with no clear sight of new stock - Now which brand would you recommend?
Lastly, another dealer recommended going for 185/65/15 vs 195/60/15 stating that my car is 5 years old (I bought the new 4th gen honda city in 2015) and the shock ups might not be able to sustain the 195s. Also there might be issues on bumps in 195s
The circumference difference is lower in 195s than 185s so I am not sure why are they recommending 185s
I am looking to make the purchase in the next week, any guidance will be appreciated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arindambasu13 I have changed the tires on my City V MT to 195/60 R15 Michelin P4ST a little more than a year and 10,000 kms back. Fantastic upgrade and no complaints thus far. Good comfort and good grip on the tires. Though Michelins were on the slightly higher price band as compared to Yokohamas (which is the other brand I was considering), I felt the price differential was well worth it. The upgrade is absolutely safe and tried/tested. You can go for the upgrade without any worries whatsoever.
I would suggest the Michelins from my personal experience, though I have not tried the Perfinzas yet (I hear they are great tires as well). You can't go wrong with either of these options. |
Hi Arindam, just wanted to check if you have had any issues in a fully loaded car (5ppl + luggage), some dealers have told me this is an issue with 195/60 and recommended 185/65
Although I can't get my head around it logically as the circumference error is lower in 195/60 than 185/65
You first hand experience will be of great help
Quote:
Originally Posted by neel911 Correct. After upsizing to 195/60R15 Michelin P3ST and ensuring the tyre pressure is maintained, I've not scraped the bottom yet while driving through the horrendous Bangalore roads full of potholes which deserve some Guinness Book of Records like award  . This is with at times 4 adult passengers in car. |
Thanks Neel
Given Michelins are out of stock, which is the next most recommended brand according to you