Team-BHP > Modifications & Accessories > Tyre & Alloy wheel Section
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
80,529 views
Old 8th December 2006, 11:25   #16
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

I recomment Bridgestone Potenza GIII.
Excellent tyre with long life. Go for 190/60 or 185/65R14.
I have had potenza's(GIII) 185/60R13 on my indica and they are great. Tread depth has held up quite a bit and ride comfort is good.
205s will be an overkill and I wouldn't recommend them.

And Contratulations!!!
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 11:28   #17
Team-BHP Support
 
Rtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,770
Thanked: 359 Times

Sam, why bother changing the tyres in the first place?

- You will not be driving this car
- The car will basically be driven in the city during peak hours where the average speed will not exceed 25kmph
- The stock tyres are already biased towards comfort.

I am the first guy to tell people to change their stock tyres (or atleast thats what The Old Man tells me), but in this case I fail to see the point. Aside from spending a bit more of your companies money, which could be put to better use like having a house party in Mumbai
Rtech is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 11:44   #18
BHPian
 
airfoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 318
Thanked: 81 Times

Sam, my vote goes to the Bridgestone Potenza GIII.

As to size, it is widely accepted that the Verna VGT is under-tyred in stock form. Even if you don't expect to drive around too much yourself, it would be prudent to upgrade the tyres from a safety standpoint. This way your car is prepped to take on an occassional adventure as well.

Your best upgrade option in my mind is 185/65 R14.

Do consider switching to Hyundai alloys!
airfoil is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 11:47   #19
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N.A
Posts: 7,046
Thanked: 2,751 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi View Post
I've got myself a Hyundai verna CRDi.

It's a company car and i will be driven to work everyday.
Bad choice - how're you going to fit all your limbs and hairy appendages into that car? Especially if you're going to be in the backseat (I'm assuming - I hope you're a front seat passenger).
Steeroid is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 11:47   #20
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

Rtech, for any other car it wont matter, but Verna crdi is severly undertyred.
Same is true for getz base model too which rides on 155!
For a car of this power 185 is a must. The stock tyres do not give adequate confidence during emergency braking.
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 11:49   #21
Team-BHP Support
 
Rtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,770
Thanked: 359 Times

Ok. Lets get better tyres!

Like the others, I think the GIII's offer the best performance/ride quality/price for the buck.
Rtech is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 14:06   #22
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 223
Thanked: 30 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai View Post
Assuming stock size of 175/70R14 on 5.5J wheels.

205/60 R14: GC will increase by 0.5mm, speedo error 0.5%, would be a good upgrade. Check whether wheel well has enough room though.
195/60 R14: GC will decrease by 5.5mm, speedo error 1.8%, reduction in GC is a concern.
185/65 R14: GC will decrease by 2.3mm, speedo error 0.7%, would be a good upgrade.
What do you mean by GC? is this same as rolling radius?
According to Car Bibles : The Wheel and Tyre Bible 205/60/R14 upgrade would increase the rolling radius by 0.17% => when your speedo shows 100KM, you are travelling at 100.17 (not a very large variation...)

for 195/60/R14, increase in rolling radius is -1.83% or when your speedo shows 100KM, you would be travelling only at 98.17 KM

for 185/65/R14, increase in rolling radius is -0.75% or when your speedo shows 100KM, you are travelling only at 99.25KM (not much variation here also....)

Also note that, this would also change the no.of km in odometer...
suppose, if your vehicle had clocked 10000 KMS in ODO.
in actual, for 205... its 10017 KM
for 195.. its only 9817KM
for 185... its only 9925KM.

regards,
ant.

EDIT: all under the assumption that verna stock tyre size is 175/70R14

Last edited by anToNIcHeN : 8th December 2006 at 14:08.
anToNIcHeN is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 14:16   #23
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,546
Thanked: 2,697 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by anToNIcHeN View Post
What do you mean by GC? is this same as rolling radius?
GC = Ground Clearance.
supremeBaleno is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 14:16   #24
Senior - BHPian
 
nitrous's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UAE/Lon/Madras
Posts: 6,965
Thanked: 325 Times

Quote:
Rtech, for any other car it wont matter, but Verna crdi is severly undertyred.
VERY VERY MUCH. Moreso with its 110 bhp power.
nitrous is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 14:29   #25
Senior - BHPian
 
v1p3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BLR / DXB / LON
Posts: 5,334
Thanked: 6,896 Times

Rtech, Sam mentioned the occasional expressway blast to Pune. Which is why I think even ABS is a good idea.

Sam, Yokohama is the way to go, man.
v1p3r is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 14:39   #26
Senior - BHPian
 
n_aditya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Namma Bengaluru
Posts: 5,348
Thanked: 3,684 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrashok View Post
Sam, I don't think Michelin makes the Certis anymore. Now their comfort range is called Energy XM. Highly recommended! Sightly costlier than others, but these tyres are really good! And you get 4 years warranty as against 3 year warranty from the others (not that warranty means anything as far as tyres are concerned).
Thats right Ashok... Certis is discontinued now and if available it is only the old stock which is still present on shelves that are being sold...

I just got the Michelin XM1 for my esteem... did not go for an upsize....got them in 175/70/13 sizes and paid 11k for 4 tires...

the tires are really good and there is almost no tire noise... ride is very smooth and handles like a dream....

so sam... pick up the michelin's... worth any day...

all the best...
n_aditya is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 15:16   #27
BHPian
 
Spyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 78
Thanked: 53 Times

Sam, Congrats on the Verna. U'll quite enjoy the car and its ride.

As for the tyres, you could try out the Yoko AVS Sports too. The 205 may be a bit wide compared to the 195, though I am aware that it has been fitted on several Verna's. the 205 will decidedly look better in my opinion.

Cheers
Spyder
Spyder is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 15:44   #28
rks
BANNED
 
rks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ??
Posts: 1,238
Thanked: 17 Times

Almost everything to be said here has been said. I would just like to add that with 205/60 R 14 tyres, you have to worry about effect on steering as well (could become quite heavy on stock steel rims; maybe OK with alloys). This is in addition to the other worries mentioned (wheel well size, FE). I personally would go for the 185/65 R 14 if I felt the need to upsize. That is, unless someone who has actual experience with the wider tyres can remove the concerns expressed.

Last edited by rks : 8th December 2006 at 15:45.
rks is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 15:57   #29
BHPian
 
Sideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Madras - India
Posts: 641
Thanked: 31 Times

Congrats Sammy. Whilst the 205 width tyre will look really mean , I would not recomend mounting a tyre of this width on a 5.5 J rim. I Would go with Samurai's suggestion of 185/65. As far as tyres are concerned, the Yoko's are good but I prefer grip levels and braking of the G III Potenza's (Bridgestone).
Sideways is offline  
Old 8th December 2006, 15:57   #30
Senior - BHPian
 
iraghava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bhaiyyaland
Posts: 8,033
Thanked: 265 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by rks View Post
Almost everything to be said here has been said. I would just like to add that with 205/60 R 14 tyres, you have to worry about effect on steering as well (could become quite heavy on stock steel rims; maybe OK with alloys). This is in addition to the other worries mentioned (wheel well size, FE). I personally would go for the 185/65 R 14 if I felt the need to upsize. That is, unless someone who has actual experience with the wider tyres can remove the concerns expressed.
I'm running 185/65 on my stock rims & it doesn't make any difference to the steering or the weightage. Also have driven quite a few OHC/Lancer's equipped with 195/205's on stock rims & the effect on the weight of the steering has been very marginal. Modern Hydraulic steering systems are quite capable of handling the increased width & rims can certainly withstand the marginally increased weight of the bigger tyres.
iraghava is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks