Thanks Torquedo for the long post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo kpzen -
I might sound blunt in certain of my statements but the inferences are drawn from the needs that you have listed. |
Bring it on, No problem!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo 1) Figo/Aspire -
i) If ABS is not mandated, the Trend would be 6.5 OTR, this is what you would have paid for the Getz in 2008, it has Airbags, Steering Mounted Controls and a host of other features which the Getz does not have. The point that I'm trying to nail is, in 2016 you are getting a 2008 priced car with the same power to weight and torque to weight ratios and added features. Getz was 1137 Kgs, 235 Nm and 110 PS (not BHP). A 2008 Swift Vxi was 4.5 OTR now it retails at 6 L odd, price have shot up over the years, but here over a gap of 8 years, you get a similar speced car with added features. It is sheer VFM. |
Theoretically spot on but practically it is a little different.
Been there Done that !
Firstly, I totally believe " They don't make cars as they used to "
2008 - Getz OTR - 5.8 lacs
2012- Figo OTR - 6.5 lacs
On paper, if both cars are compared, Figo has many features which Getz does not have.
However, in real experience feel is the opposite, we (whole family) finds Getz to be superior.
Many nifty features are missing which are never listed in a catalogue.
May be minor things on paper but gives a good feel in real time.
One such example, the door closure mechanism of Getz is butter smooth (still) whereas Figo is hard and inconsistent, got the door locks changed twice under warranty still the issue persists.
There are many such things which add to the feel, everything is not on paper.
So, I'm not going to follow the same calculation again.
However, Asprire is fantastic car. It still could be the Getz replacement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo ii) Coming to where you have stated that the built is not of the older Figo lineage, a 2000 Alto was better built than a 2015 Baleno. To keep the prices competitive, manufacturers have to cut the corners, lest they wanna run out of business. If you want ABS, Titanium with discounts is up for grabs at 7.4 OTR odd. To add to it, you have stated that the service on the Figo is cheaper than a Maruti. |
Correct.
I'm from the manufacturing industry and we face the Value engineering/ Cost cutting challenges on day to day basis.
But, as a buyer I need to evaluate the cost cutting areas that are acceptable to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo iii) On the distance to service center, if you travel 80 Kms a day, 80 kms over a 6 month period on what you love should be HELL YESS, I wanna get it done in front of my eyes. |
Servicing at 10k kms can be managed, Figo is also managed the same way.
One fine morning, if your car doesn't start or say the engine is heating up. What do you do ? Service center is 40kms away with no pick up service.
My job involves travelling and if such things happen, I don't want to invite trouble to parents.
Hope you understand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo iv) On the narrow seats, you cannot get a 5 BHK for the price of 1, space, power, VFM all in one sounds good to the ears, does not look nice to the pocket. |
I never demanded seats 5 times its current size.
But, a car that causes back pain to me and passengers on long journeys cannot be appreciated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo 2) Used - If you are open to - Pre Worshiped Polo 1.6 GT TDi
i) Looks
ii) 250 Nm
iii) Build, Handling, Features over Getz |
Could find only one here and it was an accidental case. Backed out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torquedo 3) Used - If you are open to - Pre Worshiped Chevrolet Cruze LT
i) Let us not think about obsolete models, Getz was obsolete in 2009.
ii) It overcomes the issue of narrow seats.
iii) A minimum of 327 Nm
iv) Might be less fuel efficient.
4) Used - If you are open to - Pre Worshiped TL/CL Jetta
i) Will give more luxury over Getz and 320 Nm
ii) Might be less fuel efficient.
|
Great cars.
But the anti pollution rules being proposed seem to be against them.