Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Trouble Although a sub may seem perfect on paper, it's a known fact that the best judgement lies with people who have heard and critically evaluated a wide range of subs for extended periods of time. I have heard most of the brands but never really had the flexibility to play with them, like using them in a multitude of boxes, trying them in different ported enclosures etc, listen to them for long periods etc.
1. JL Audio (Just when I thought they couldn't get any better, they sprung us the W7s!)
2. RE (I'll kill for a RE XXX sub, no jokes. The joke however is, which end of that sub goes in first?)
3. Focal (Utopian Blisssss)
4. Illusion Audio (Awesome fleet-footed, quarter-kilo pounders)
5. ID (Arguably, the best subwoofer brand EVER!)
6. Kicker Solobarics (before they went gay, erm.. square)
7. Phase Linear (Only the Aliante please!) |
B&T now that everyone (i think Jb will post a reply soon) has replied, here is my take...
We have a tendency to play with multiple enclosures; small sealed, big sealed, ported, IB with all our subs. Typically, we have enclosures lying around we run different subs in our test car all the time. That car has seen more brands than most installers shops.
Usually, we'll keep the 'experimental' sub+enclosure for a couple of days, throw 20-30 of our test CDs at it, before reaching a conclusion. That said, we give anything a try and some subs havent lasted 5 minutes cuz they sounded like dogturd.
Firstly, We have used and heard all of the above with the exception of the XXX and the Aliante. So my opinion of these two is only based on what I have heard of them from some stalwarts of the International ICE community...
1. JL Audio - Great subs in terms of build quality. Sound wise though we like the earlier versions of the lower series better than the current ones. The W6 are great SQ performers but when we ABX'ed with the iDMax the W6 lost out on low end and efficiency, where the iDMax clearly emerged as the better SQ sub and had more output too. The W7s are just smooth SPL and at that price, there are cheaper, better SPL subs around. Today, the W7s are more or less a status symbol.
2. RE - Well some of their subs are (were?) made for RE by iD. iD also make eD, Arc and others subs on ODM basis. Hmmm... the XXX is a SPL monster. It is not as quick as a w6 or an iDMax but has much more extension, insane power handling and is less efficient. RE XXX if you want huge amounts of thick sounding deep bass.
3. Focal - Again, smooth musical subs. But... bottom end could be better. Works very well with most 'good' music, but show limited bandwidth with hip-hop etc
4. Illusion Audio - fast, kick well, agile... lack low end grunt. Dont know how the new ones are though.
5. ID - The iDQs are a legend by all rights. And they deserve the accolades. For the price, we are yet to hear a more 'honest' sub. They will represent the music extremely well, with great fidelity, whether its classical, pop, rock or hip-hop. the iDv3 subs are a bit cheaper, and have more bottom end, better looks (to most people... though Jb and I love the oldskool look of the iDQ). The iDMax of course is another legend. Takes a crapper all over other SPL subs and mantains incredible SQ while doing so. for a super-sub, its very efficient too... works well with as less as 400w and takes upto 1000w. The iDMax has a unique ribbed low end output that brings a smile to your face.
6. Kicker Solobarics - Well apart from the advantage they have in sheer surface area, I didnt find much to write home about.
7. Phase Linear - The Aliante is a very good performer, articulate too... but I know people who have used these AND the iDMax but prefer the iD for better low end and more punch.
Three 12s in an SUV should work well. We recently heard an iDQ10 in a small sealed box in an Endeavour and it was very musical, and louder than I expected with just 150w. But then, its not gonna win any SPL competitions. With 1.5kw you could have great headroom and with 3 drivers driven sanely you will stay within the linear functioning area. Hmmm... there are quite a few subs that dont boom... however, a lot of those 'flat' subs dont represent the lower frequencies well. B&T, I know a lot of people expect me to say this... and trust me this is my honest opinion... You need to seriously consider iDQs or iDv3 subs. A lot of subwoofers nowadays do quite a few things well. But there are no others (at this price point) that do all the things the iDs do. Personally, for my listening tastes, I find the iDQs better than a lot of subs several times the price. While our listening tastes are similar, Jb differs from me on this, he prefers the Hertz Mille subs by a small margin.
Also, I agree with Navinji, I havent heard a really fast, agile Alum cone sub. This includes Audiobahn and Eclipse. While the Eclipse is far far better than the Audiobahn, it manages to miss my 'sweet spot' by a fair margin.
That said, I rely on Hoffmans Iron Law to predict (reliably most of the times, but there have been exceptions) subwoofer character when I compare parameters on paper. You should study the iD datasheets from their website and see if you can figure out what they've got right that the others havent. I dont know if its possible to duplicate the performance of any sub by replicating TS parameters but I wish you good luck and hope you come up with a great SQL driver.