bling on with kenwood sub

navin · 16th February 2009, 12:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by hellspawn

YouTube - Kenwood KFC-W3000L@Gyro.co.in[/url]

as per your declaration here you are commercially affilaiated with Kenwood via Gyro!
http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/ask-gu...larations.html

reveal_da_zeal · 22nd February 2009, 01:28

Whats the light all about. It seems good and flashy. I would like go for it but would like to know as I've heard and seen its said to be SQ if anyone can confirm. Whatever but it looks shiny...

suprateep · 25th February 2009, 10:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by reveal_da_zeal

Whats the light all about. It seems good and flashy. I would like go for it but would like to know as I've heard and seen its said to be SQ if anyone can confirm. Whatever but it looks shiny...

so what's the SQ like? Boomy? Tight? Bassy?

this can add a lot of zing to a hatch back - IMHO a decent value at a good price point provided the SQ is good.

abhinav.gupta88 · 25th February 2009, 11:02

Suprateep.
Its 200w rms for around 7000 bucks. There are cheaper subs providing you with better power and SQ.

noidaboy · 25th February 2009, 13:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhinav.gupta88

Suprateep.
Its 200w rms for around 7000 bucks. There are cheaper subs providing you with better power and SQ.

Bhai what is the relation between 200w rms and SQ?
Have you auditioned it? or you are just assuming?

panky12345 · 25th February 2009, 14:26

..probably he meant better output @ cheaper price.

now what the statement 200W and SQ means here..this kenwood 200W can outperform JBL Gti or IDMAX? NO!

gunbir · 25th February 2009, 14:58

Noidaboy asked a very simple question... NOT having heard the product, how can anyone judge the output or SQ of the said product. When one says "better output"... Again, how did one arrive at that conclusion without listening to the said product?

Please! By twisting words and facts, you must not misuse the freedom of expression available here to malign any products / brands without any factual basis.

This (with all due respect), appears to be a novelty product, the novelty of which seems to be the lighting. From what I've been told, it's a decent performer. Even if it performs (sonically) as well as Kenwood's own 3K subs, there may be some who want such a product. The manufacturer seems to think so, else they would not spend on developing such a product.

Let's keep an open mind. Why must every product be compared to our favorite brand or product. There is enough room for everyone to coexist with their own tastes and preferances.

End of rant.

low_bass_makker · 25th February 2009, 15:13

In my opinion Kenwood is not know for its speakers and woofer. They majorly know for there HU`s and little for the amps....

Rest the sub in question are for those who want BLING first and SQ or SPL later. They want a aesthetically good install rather than a good sounding one. Having not heard this sub cannot commet on it further but having heard kenwood models did not find any this great in them also.

ritayan · 25th February 2009, 15:19

Guys, OT by a long shot Please have a look at the following link

Blue Ocean Strategy

Please Manufacturers when devaloping a product has a certain USP and a target audience in mind. Not every thing is everyones cup of tea. Lets comment on a product on its product placement.

abhibh · 25th February 2009, 15:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by low_bass_makker

In my opinion Kenwood is not know for its speakers and woofer. They majorly know for there HU`s and little for the amps....

Rest the sub in question are for those who want BLING first and SQ or SPL later. They want a aesthetically good install rather than a good sounding one. Having not heard this sub cannot commet on it further but having heard kenwood models did not find any this great in them also.

I think you are forgetting the old Kenwood subs. The Silver and Blue Cone ones (2002). They were pretty good and had a tight kick.

22nd February 2009, 01:28	#17
reveal_da_zeal BHPian Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Chandigarh Posts: 82 Thanked: Once	Whats the light all about. It seems good and flashy. I would like go for it but would like to know as I've heard and seen its said to be SQ if anyone can confirm. Whatever but it looks shiny...
	() Thanks

25th February 2009, 11:02	#19
abhinav.gupta88 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Delhi , India Posts: 4,090 Thanked: 341 Times View My Garage	Suprateep. Its 200w rms for around 7000 bucks. There are cheaper subs providing you with better power and SQ.
	() Thanks

25th February 2009, 14:26	#21
panky12345 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New Delhi Posts: 2,697 Thanked: 172 Times	..probably he meant better output @ cheaper price. now what the statement 200W and SQ means here..this kenwood 200W can outperform JBL Gti or IDMAX? NO! Last edited by panky12345 : 25th February 2009 at 14:28.
	() Thanks

25th February 2009, 14:58	#22
gunbir Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New Delhi Posts: 2,465 Thanked: 33 Times	Noidaboy asked a very simple question... NOT having heard the product, how can anyone judge the output or SQ of the said product. When one says "better output"... Again, how did one arrive at that conclusion without listening to the said product? Please! By twisting words and facts, you must not misuse the freedom of expression available here to malign any products / brands without any factual basis. This (with all due respect), appears to be a novelty product, the novelty of which seems to be the lighting. From what I've been told, it's a decent performer. Even if it performs (sonically) as well as Kenwood's own 3K subs, there may be some who want such a product. The manufacturer seems to think so, else they would not spend on developing such a product. Let's keep an open mind. Why must every product be compared to our favorite brand or product. There is enough room for everyone to coexist with their own tastes and preferances. End of rant.
	() Thanks

25th February 2009, 15:13	#23
low_bass_makker Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Faridabad Posts: 6,813 Thanked: 306 Times View My Garage	In my opinion Kenwood is not know for its speakers and woofer. They majorly know for there HU`s and little for the amps.... Rest the sub in question are for those who want BLING first and SQ or SPL later. They want a aesthetically good install rather than a good sounding one. Having not heard this sub cannot commet on it further but having heard kenwood models did not find any this great in them also.
	() Thanks

25th February 2009, 15:19	#24
ritayan BHPian Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Back in Delhi Posts: 228 Thanked: 48 Times View My Garage	Guys, OT by a long shot Please have a look at the following link Blue Ocean Strategy Please Manufacturers when devaloping a product has a certain USP and a target audience in mind. Not every thing is everyones cup of tea. Lets comment on a product on its product placement.
	() Thanks