![]() | |
Originally Posted by tsk1979
(Post 465833)
lbm, its not just the 99.9% purity part. Thats just the ETP grade. Finolex, L&T and other cables which are certified BIS IS 694 standard should meet many other criteria too. I found this link Copper India When I got my apartment constructed, I specifically got it checked that the wiring, including 15A wiring for AC points is all IS 694 compliant and the builder does not use any silly non BIS certified brands. Since a 300W (Not sound, but electric rating) amp will carry around 25AMP of current, the wiring should be rated for higher. Most BIS standard wiring from reputed companies has the max current carrying capacity written on it. Moreover in all these brands you can also choose wires specially insulated to withstand 70 degree + ambient temparatures(industrial wiring). |
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker
(Post 465816)
this is a pic of a electrical panel |
Originally Posted by navin
(Post 465857)
Silver has an added advantage. Silver oxide is conductive. Cooper oxide is not. Besides there are some that believe that each metal (and some other materials like carbon) adds it's own signature to the sound (this does not apply to Power cables) along with other factors like core geometry, skin effect, dielectric, and even the granular structure of conductors. Gold and silver are supposed to enhance detail, carbon fibre is supposed to induce a relaxing presentaion, Titanium is suppsoed to enhance the bass, copper increaes warmth etc... . I know of cables that claim to have all these elements and more! |
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker
(Post 465858)
every thing is fine tsk.....but the above rating is done on the basis of AC but not on DC .......as DC will require thicker wires.... |
Originally Posted by tsk1979
(Post 465875)
Yea forgot about that. Thats why 4 Guage wire to carry 30AMPS while in DC it can take in 50amps I suppose. |
Originally Posted by tsk1979
(Post 465875)
I guess atleast skin effect wont be a problem in DC :). |
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker
(Post 465881)
It would be the other way round....and I think the differnce would be greater.... |
Originally Posted by navin
(Post 465887)
All these claims are usually just for smal signal (read as AC). |
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker
(Post 465881)
It would be the other way round....and I think the differnce would be greater.... |
Originally Posted by nura
(Post 466043)
A question to the Gurus. What are these horn loaded compression drivers from Image Dynamics? . |
Originally Posted by tsk1979
(Post 465875)
As for the mood wires, I know of a few gentelmen from the history book who claimed that a chemical reaction existed which could convert Iron to gold! I even read about a few of them in a Fantasy and dragon lore |
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi
(Post 466458)
Alchemy. Has Arabic origins I remember. Kimiya I believe means metal. Alchemists also dabbled in the ancient days with Magick and potions. There is a certain occultic mysticism attached with the processes. |
Originally Posted by navin
(Post 465478)
Many if not all tannoys also need horn loading (like many but not all fullrange drivers) to create a balanced sound. I have used the HPD 10 (Eaton) and 15 (Berkley) as well as the Gold 12 (still have a pair of LSU/HF/12G drivers around somewhere). Like I have said before age has it's priviliages! :-) and they were good drivers but i many ways I am begining to believe that the ga Jme has moved on.ust like the game for the big block (350cc and more) V8s has moved on with the new advent of modern 2.0 liter "microprocessor controlled turbochagered and fuel injected" engines producing all the power/torque with half the weight. Like it or not the HF unit looks like it is a "wave guide". The only disagreemment we seem to have is if this wave guide is moving (a woofer cone). I do not understand how you can say that the woofer in a tannoy dual concentric will not affect the HF emanting from it's center. I am not comparing a dual concentric to a traditional multi way speaker. I too find most of these missing that "special something". Fullranges despite their shortcomig i managing the entire musical spectrum (some are also strangely coloured in their delivery) are more coherent. My experiences with managing a fullrange (Jordan JX92) using a "super tweeter" like the OW4 and a woofer like a pair of 8" (Focal 8K516J in this case) have not been very successful. Although my XO is around 100 and 5k the coherence still gets lost. So the search goes on. Other options (dipoles, planar-dynamic combos, and more) will also have to be further researched. I have tried one planar dynamic combo that was nice (but coloured) using a pair of 12" (isobarik) mated to a Maggie SMGa. Now I fear we are seriously OT. Thanks to my initial comment. So before the rest of the forum starts leaving we should take this discussion to PM. Disclaimer: I have not heard or used the smaller 6.5 and 8" DC Tannoys other than some rudimentery listening at various Audio shows. |
Originally Posted by Autophile
(Post 466559)
Tannoy still rules as drivers. The wave guide is not moving. Its stationary and sits in front of the tweeter inside the woofers voice coil and the throw of HF is controlled by this waveguide not by woofer cone.. |
Originally Posted by Autophile
(Post 466559)
Regarding supertweeter I have listened for a long time to Tannoy Canterbury's with and without Supertweeter, ST 200 which costs 2 lakhs a pair on top of 10 Lakhs for pair of loudspeakers. |
Originally Posted by santosh.s
(Post 465924)
If so, is this the reason behind these special effect claims? And do these effects reduce by using high volt preamps (4-5 volts)?? |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 19:16. | |