Team-BHP > In-Car Entertainment
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
3,538 views
Old 6th January 2006, 12:38   #16
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mumbai (but wat
Posts: 6,997
Thanked: 2,378 Times

On behalf of Navin:

He meant, acoustically isolate the sub. Physically, boxwise.
Sam Kapasi is offline  
Old 6th January 2006, 15:25   #17
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 25,198
Thanked: 9,300 Times

yeah, what Sam says...it prevents Doppler distortion.
navin is offline  
Old 6th January 2006, 15:52   #18
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 361
Thanked: Once

hello sam,
right now 2 speakers and 1 sub is in 1 large box and installed in 3 different compartments of the same box.
1. should i put 2 speakers in 1 box and the sub in a different box? wont it feel as if bass is pounding from one corner of the boot?
2. or, should i get 3 different boxes and arrange the woofer's box in-between the 2 speaker boxes? will it sound better in this config or the 1st config?

regards,
anuj
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi
On behalf of Navin:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi

He meant, acoustically isolate the sub. Physically, boxwise.
rev_hard is offline  
Old 6th January 2006, 17:22   #19
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mumbai (but wat
Posts: 6,997
Thanked: 2,378 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by rev_hard
hello sam,
right now 2 speakers and 1 sub is in 1 large box and installed in 3 different compartments of the same box.
Then it's ok - just make sure
1) the 3 compartments are properly sealed from each other.
2) Lower the gain on your 222, connect only the speakers to it and get a decent amp for the subwoofer.
3) Love your parents and be faithful to your woman (And if you cant be faithful, try really hard)
Sam Kapasi is offline  
Old 6th January 2006, 18:14   #20
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 361
Thanked: Once

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi
2) Lower the gain on your 222, connect only the speakers to it and get a decent amp for the subwoofer.
hi sam,
i have two sony 222's installed. should i junk 1 for a upgrade and connect one speaker each to one amp or is 1 222 enough for 1 sub? also, what amp upgrade would you recommend.

regards,
anuj
rev_hard is offline  
Old 7th January 2006, 15:16   #21
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mumbai (but wat
Posts: 6,997
Thanked: 2,378 Times

Use 222 for the fronts and one for the rears. As navin suggested, buy a JBL CS60.2 for the subwoofer. Bridge it and connect it in LPF mode to the sub. Buss. Ho Gaya.
Sam Kapasi is offline  
Old 7th January 2006, 16:12   #22
Senior - BHPian
 
iceman91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne/banga
Posts: 1,961
Thanked: 34 Times

yeah i have not heard the jbl..but if sam and navin say its good go for it..else get a good monoblock for around 6-7k...
you can also check the sony monoblock, pioneer monoblock. they are in your budget...more expensive ones are alpine rockford fosgate earthquake etc..

Last edited by iceman91 : 7th January 2006 at 16:25.
iceman91 is offline  
Old 9th January 2006, 10:40   #23
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 25,198
Thanked: 9,300 Times

funny but at teh lower price points a stereo amp bridged into mono might be better VFM.
navin is offline  
Old 9th January 2006, 11:17   #24
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mumbai (but wat
Posts: 6,997
Thanked: 2,378 Times

I have heard the 60.2 bridged into one 12" woofer - it makes phenomenal VFM.
Sam Kapasi is offline  
Old 9th January 2006, 11:22   #25
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 25,198
Thanked: 9,300 Times

at a lower price point the sony 502 can work too.
navin is offline  
Old 10th January 2006, 10:37   #26
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 361
Thanked: Once

hi navin,

isn't the 502 another 2 channel amp from sony. i got it fitted in my bro's zen. i feel its just a marginally better product than the 222. confusion is reigning supreme herein navin, so please clarify.

i think 502 is just rated at 28w pmpo above the 222. does it really make a difference then?

regards
anuj
Quote:
Originally Posted by navin
at a lower price point the sony 502 can work too.
rev_hard is offline  
Old 10th January 2006, 10:52   #27
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 25,198
Thanked: 9,300 Times

I've heard about the 502 and used the 504. the 504 is very grainy but ok for sub duties as it can swing volts into low impedances. I expect the 502 to be a 2 ch. version of the 504. However if you are in doubt try the JBL 60.2 albeit at a higher price.

I have not compared the 222 to the 502 or 504 so cant say for sure. However there are many amps that while being ok running into 4 ohms run out of steam when asked to manage a 2 ohm load.

A 2 ch. amp when brdiged sees a 4 ohm speaker as it would 2 ohm speakers if it was used a stereo amp.

Watt ratings of most amps are very optimistic. I would test the 502 on the grounds that if it does not swing enough volts (is not loud enough) you can upgrade to the 60.2 and if that is not enough the 300.1! :-)
navin is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks