Re: 2024 Mercedes EQG to debut new battery tech; store 10x more charge & offer 20% more range Quote:
Originally Posted by one-77 How does 10X more charge and 20% more range add up to 483 Km/ 300 miles? |
While I’m not an expert on the matter, usually when efficiency gains like “20% more range” are concerned, the difference purely comes from weight/size reductions due to material science advancements.
We cannot break the rules of physics — an 80kWh battery will still store 80kWh with these new gizmos. Just that the weight may drop from like, 500kg to 350-400kg which is a big ask for a vehicle like the G which already weighs 2.5ton in its ICE guise.
While going from graphite anode to Silicon may offer 10x charge holding capacity, it is probably expressed as a comparison with mass parity or volume parity (as in, 1kg of graphite anode = X amount of charge and 1kg of silicon anode = 10•X amount of charge). I’d assume that the 10x figure is from anode to anode comparison, no battery to battery. Because battery itself has much more parts than anode.
Think of it as a comparison between the cylinder volume — boreXstroke. Many oldies had as much as 10-15L engines in past but they don’t even make half as much bhp as modern day econoboxes.
The pain point here though, is that the electrodes make up very small percentage by mass composition of a battery to begin with. So if a 500kg battery had a 10kg combined anode material, it became 1kg. The new mass is still 491kg.
The main weight comes from the aluminium enclosure of cells, the copper wiring, and the steel frames to impart structural integrity to the pack, not the batteries themselves.
Such details are of course difficult to verify since the brands are very tight lipped on their tech and unless there’s some kind of teardown by say sandy munro etc, we might as well never know how much of the claimed gains are actually present in the production vehicle |