Team-BHP > The Indian Car Scene
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
5,567 views
Old 1st May 2010, 22:36   #16
Senior - BHPian
 
sandeepmdas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 695141, SY208AA
Posts: 1,576
Thanked: 2,768 Times

Well, it has been a known fact that the "leaked" info is usually leaked purposefully just to create more interest about the product; Mobile phone makers and business jet manufacturers are the two prime examples - that's what I read. Don't have any links,

Taking snaps on a public road is not an offence unless you're not aiming at another person. Doing so in a hotel/mall parking can be an offence, depends on the property owners viewpoint. Taking snaps inside a house's compound is certainly an offence unless you're in good rapport with the house owner. An accredited press photographer can do all these, if it justifies his work.

Last edited by sandeepmdas : 1st May 2010 at 22:39.
sandeepmdas is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 22:43   #17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 1,399
Thanked: 148 Times

unless the photo's aren't taken on private property then its absolutely fine.
vinaydas is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 23:00   #18
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,451
Thanked: 30,078 Times

By being on private property, you may well be trespassing. Taking photographs? Unless there is something in Indian law about this... I don't think there is anything illegal about photographing private property.

Remember too that there is civil law and criminal law.
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 11:41   #19
Senior - BHPian
 
McLaren Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mysore
Posts: 3,465
Thanked: 5,537 Times

I remember Fifth Gear doing a segment about spy photographers a while back. The got a spy pic and the driver of the test car got off and tried to argue that the photographer was breaching the law and asked him to hand over the cam. The photographer told him to go to hell
McLaren Rulez is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 22:50   #20
BHPian
 
grules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chennai
Posts: 175
Thanked: 7 Times

I agree that the general notion here is, you spot a masked vehicle on public road then you can just click pics of it and publish it. Then what happens to cases like the Logan notchback which seems to have been spotted inside Mahindra campus?

Another point that i would like to know more about is the case of 'Trade secrets'.
Quote:
What is a Trade Secret?
A trade secret refers to data or information relating to the business which is not generally known to the public and which the owner reasonably attempts to keep secret and confidential. Trade secrets generally give the business a competitive edge over their rivals. Almost any type of data, processes or information can be referred to as trade secrets so long as it is intended to be and kept a secret, and involves an economic interest of the owner. For example, a business may have certain internal business processes that it follows for its day-to-day operations that give it an edge over its competitors. This could be regarded as a trade secret.
Reference: Protecting Your Trade Secrets

The clause "owner reasonably attempts to keep secret and confidential" is what the manufacturer is doing to camaflauge the test vehicle. We petrol heads do publish scoop pics, analyze them, photoshop them to reveal the details. Isn't it revealing a trade secret to the competitor.

Disclaimer: I don't work for any automobile company
grules is offline  
Old 3rd May 2010, 13:54   #21
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Thad E Ginathom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chennai
Posts: 11,451
Thanked: 30,078 Times

My guess is that a company cannot enforce the keeping of trade secrets against anybody except its own employees and those that have committed to a relevant agreement.
Quote:
We petrol heads do publish scoop pics, analyze them, photoshop them to reveal the details. Isn't it revealing a trade secret to the competitor.
No it isn't: if the company is careless with its trade secrets, then it can't prevent what has become public being further shared. You are not revealing a trade secret, because you were not party to it in the first place: you are merely sharing and speculating upon, something that you, as a member of the public, have discovered --- as long as you did not break the law (trespass, breaking and entering, etc) to make that discovery.
Thad E Ginathom is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks