![]() |
Originally Posted by Daewood
(Post 1943934)
So let's keep the Palio 1.6 out of this race. Even here in another thread a few members have complained about non-delivery of the 1.6, even 5 months after booking. Guess BS VI is the reason. |
Originally Posted by clevermax
(Post 1949219)
So you know only the S10 ? :D |
S10 had closer gear ratios apart from the Sachin's signature, and of course a different spoiler too. |
Palio 1.6 GTX Palio 1.6 Sports Palio 1.6 Stile Sports which had less weight and softer suspension than the earlier ones. |
Originally Posted by Sheel
(Post 1950522)
I am not very good with Cars :[ Didn't know about Gear ratios, i just saw the spoiler Stile? the older Palio looks so much better than the current one. I am trying to pick between Swift P & D |
Originally Posted by .anshuman
(Post 1951006)
^^ I do not agree, The sales figures have nothing to do with the Fun to Drive factor. Swift without a doubt is a very entertaining and involving car to drive, even the Palio 1.6 cannot match it the way it flows in a corner. |
I was wondering all this while how come my mind was more leaning not towards the swift and accepting it as a enthusiasts car. When there were so many people who voted for this to be an enthusiasts car. Then I realized one main factor which would affect my decision making process, I for sure to be calling a car an enthusiast car I would be choosing one which is not a common place. Think of it, when you are discussing about factors like handling, torque etc about your enthu car with your friend, you would expect him to go pepped up and say wow.. and Oh is it... etc. But unfortunately, Swift though a well built one, lacks this factor, which I feel is very critical. I mean when you talk about its handling, I am sure your friends will tell, ya my bro has it, my dad has it, my uncle has it.. even my grandpa loves driving it.... :Shockked: When that happens there is nothing left to discuss about the car. In effect, there is no enthusiasm about a car which is too common place and sold one of four cars in its category. Just to add to my justification, think about it what does Palio 1.6, the Original Zen and Alto 1.1 have in common, they are not common sight. I know not many people would agree to my point, but thats how I am.. |
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno
(Post 1948688)
Between the Swift-P and Swift-D, which would be the better driver's car ? |
Originally Posted by Mi10
(Post 1948711)
I have'nt driven the K-Series Swift. But Between the 1.3 DDIS and 1.3 G13BB i ll give it to the DDIS. DDIS is far more easier and responsive to drive in cities. In highway although the G13BB performs superbly, the inherent nature of diesel performance (when nicely warm engines) give DDIS a Distinct advantage. In my recent Highway trip, there was a Copper DDIS follwing us. After each toll, i take off like a rocket, only to find the DDIS blazing past after i cross the 3-figure mark!!. |
Originally Posted by adi99
(Post 1951186)
Swift DDis it is. +100. After I drove my friend's DDis, within a month I sold my year old Swift P (G13B) and bought a Swift D. The turbo kick is addictive. Not driven the K series though. My vote goes to DDis. |
Originally Posted by xingamazon
(Post 1950922)
I was wondering all this while how come my mind was more leaning not towards the swift and accepting it as a enthusiasts car. When there were so many people who voted for this to be an enthusiasts car. Then I realized one main factor which would affect my decision making process, I for sure to be calling a car an enthusiast car I would be choosing one which is not a common place. Think of it, when you are discussing about factors like handling, torque etc about your enthu car with your friend, you would expect him to go pepped up and say wow.. and Oh is it... etc. But unfortunately, Swift though a well built one, lacks this factor, which I feel is very critical. I mean when you talk about its handling, I am sure your friends will tell, ya my bro has it, my dad has it, my uncle has it.. even my grandpa loves driving it.... :Shockked: When that happens there is nothing left to discuss about the car. In effect, there is no enthusiasm about a car which is too common place and sold one of four cars in its category. Just to add to my justification, think about it what does Palio 1.6, the Original Zen and Alto 1.1 have in common, they are not common sight. I know not many people would agree to my point, but thats how I am.. |
Originally Posted by adi99
(Post 1951186)
Swift DDis it is. +100. After I drove my friend's DDis, within a month I sold my year old Swift P (G13B) and bought a Swift D. The turbo kick is addictive. Not driven the K series though. My vote goes to DDis. |
Originally Posted by Amartya
(Post 1951189)
I think your perception of a driver's car is a little skewed. A turbo-kick might be addictive, but it ain't no driver's car compared to the K-series petrol. With that sweet revving engine and decent gearbox, the Swift petrol is the one that comes out on top of its sibling. A reasonably linear, wide powerband, with high revving capability is still the quintessential driver's car. |
Originally Posted by adi99
(Post 1951200)
Buddy, I have clearly mentioned that I have not driven the K series Swift. |
Originally Posted by xingamazon
(Post 1950922)
I was wondering all this while how come my mind was more leaning not towards the swift and accepting it as a enthusiasts car. When there were so many people who voted for this to be an enthusiasts car. Then I realized one main factor which would affect my decision making process, I for sure to be calling a car an enthusiast car I would be choosing one which is not a common place. Think of it, when you are discussing about factors like handling, torque etc about your enthu car with your friend, you would expect him to go pepped up and say wow.. and Oh is it... etc. But unfortunately, Swift though a well built one, lacks this factor, which I feel is very critical. I mean when you talk about its handling, I am sure your friends will tell, ya my bro has it, my dad has it, my uncle has it.. even my grandpa loves driving it.... :Shockked: When that happens there is nothing left to discuss about the car. In effect, there is no enthusiasm about a car which is too common place and sold one of four cars in its category. Just to add to my justification, think about it what does Palio 1.6, the Original Zen and Alto 1.1 have in common, they are not common sight. I know not many people would agree to my point, but thats how I am.. |
Originally Posted by clevermax
(Post 1951100)
Very well, I have driven two cars long distances, in fact I hit nearly 170 Kmph on a stock Swift P on a straight empty road. But on a corner, I'd love to drive a 1.6 than Swift. I respect your opinion but for me Swift has never been that fun to drive like a 1.6 - it's very addictive. Swift leads the poll because Palio 1.6 is not currently on sale, and the thread starter said we need to consider only those cars which are on sale in showrooms now. Interesting point, I tend to agree with it :) |
Originally Posted by blue_pulsar
(Post 1951190)
Huh?!?! Going by this logic, all FTD cars should not sell well, right? Going by that logic, the ambassador sells less than 1000 a month. It should top the list of FTD/Driver's Car/Enthusiasts' car? Actually the logic should be "Swift is a FTD car which also sells well". There is no relation between the two factors, at least in India. |
Originally Posted by Mi10
(Post 1951281)
I any car that gives a fun to 'drive' factor is an enthusiasts car. It is not necessary that they should always sell less than the competition. Swift anyway is a more FTD car than your first gen Zen and Alto 1.1. I thought Swift handles better in corners than the Palio. I have the experience of being smoked by the Palio 1.6 in Straights / highways well when i was doing well over the mid-3 figure mark |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 08:36. |