![]() |
Originally Posted by Sheel
(Post 2976949)
Once you wring the throttle open of both bikes, I think you can find significant difference between both (NS & CBR250R that is) Acceleration wise, I personally think, the power build-up & seat of pants feel is more in sync with the R15, though the thrust at ~8K is better. I love peaky engine & absolutely loved revving the NS. |
Originally Posted by ebonho
(Post 2976537)
Excellent review with great photos Preetam! 149 kmph is very very impressive. Was this with the stock tyres or the PSD's? Makes the NS as fast (or actually faster) than the bulkier CBR 250 then. This is actually faster than the fastest the guys field testing the bike have achieved (145), so I guess the production version must have some updates over and above those. |
Originally Posted by am1m
(Post 2976331)
Great review there mate! You've covered exactly the sort of things I was looking for in a usable bike review. The placement of the streetlights in the 8.jpg snap is wow! |
Originally Posted by extreme_torque
(Post 2976422)
Good review! Can you tell me the revs at which it does 100 kmph in top gear. I want a relaxed tourer and if it does it around say 6500 rpm I know which is going to be my next bike :D |
Originally Posted by Blow Horn Ok
(Post 2976492)
Fantastically detailed report and fabulous pictures preetam! You have highlighted the characteristics of the bike very well. That was a very low rate of exchange for your brand new OEM tyres. Nevertheless Its good to learn that the performance of your ride has increased considerably. I checked out the bike sometime back and I was impressed. The seating comfort was way better than my P150. The seat, handlebar and foot peg placement felt very comfortable. The only problem in my opinion were the oem Eurogrips. Ride Safe! |
Originally Posted by ebonho
(Post 2976537)
149 kmph is very very impressive. Was this with the stock tyres or the PSD's? Makes the NS as fast (or actually faster) than the bulkier CBR 250 then. This is actually faster than the fastest the guys field testing the bike have achieved (145), so I guess the production version must have some updates over and above those. |
Originally Posted by shamik.bose
(Post 2976578)
Very impressive review, Preetam. The tyres might have cost a bomb, but they look brilliant, and according to you, justify the price. Brilliant pictures. Hats off to you! :thumbs up |
EDIT: That is one good-looking helmet. That your artwork too? :) |
Originally Posted by svsantosh
(Post 2976611)
You sure know your way with photos :) nice work on pics... thx for the detailed feedback too, me currently on a 220F, making me want this! |
Originally Posted by anjan_c2007
(Post 2976663)
Thanks Preetam for the very good review of your new buy. Congratulations.I first saw this bike and clicked its pictures during the Independence Day V & C Car and Bike Static Display we had, earlier this year. The venue was the Bajaj dealer's premises where the KTM Duke and the 200 NS were parked among the V & C displays. I had a talk with the dealer and he told about the new features and the USP's of this bike. I also could sense that this was very different from the earlier Pulsars. The EFI and the water cooled engine with the three spark plugs and its PERFORMANCE truly make it stand out. Your review gives a very good insight for enthusiasts. |
Originally Posted by //M
(Post 2976670)
Finally the review is up. Nice choice Preetam Da.:) The yellow NS looks terrific. Avishar did mention that the Pirelli's are glued to the tarmac and are an awesome upgrade from the stock tyres. Great choice of motorcycle and a great choice of color too. Ofcourse the photography is brilliant !! :Cheering: |
Originally Posted by pugram
(Post 2976691)
Good photos and an equally good review. The engine and weight distribution (stability) seem to be the only good points, from your review. |
Regarding the "Self Cancelling" indicators, I have found them to be more of a pain than facility in my P180 and remember mumbling to myself frequently, if the designers ever used this in peak traffic. Happy biking and do drive safe. |
Originally Posted by ashwin.terminat
(Post 2976733)
Ah, now I know whose pictures I loved so much on Facebook! Absolutely stunning, stunning pictures and the words accompanying the pictures were brilliantly put as well. Overall, one of the best reviews I've read in a long time, the metaphors are something I'm going to hold on to for any future reviews of mine! Congrats on the awesome bike, got to ride one for a short while a few days ago and was thoroughly impressed. This is definitely a bike for the ages, a big step ahead in the biking scene. Also, 149kmph, any observed Speedo Errors? Also, do let me know if you find any mechanic who can tune even a Single Spark Plug engine properly. :P I've had carburetor issues for a while now and everyone gets the idling to be inconsistent with their tuning. Looking forward to a long term review soon! |
Originally Posted by Ricci
(Post 2976826)
Great post, Preetam, and fantastic pics, esp the street-lamps visible with starring around the light source - off-topic but may I ask which camera/lens combo? |
149km/h indicated speed suggests ~12-15km/h speedometer error. |
Where you note 350km tank range, is that including reserve (i.e, running till empty) or tankful till you hit reserve ? Early reviews promised/reported very good efficiency, some claiming as much as 58+ in frugal mode, but your reported figures show otherwise. Still not bad at all considering my 220 returns only a little more. |
Originally Posted by Sheel
(Post 2976949)
This is a superb initial riding impression you have posted. Thanks for sharing :thumbs up Infact, the pics better me by some margin. P-200 NS And dude, your helmet rocks. Hope to catch up with you whenever I am @ Calcutta. |
Once you wring the throttle open of both bikes, I think you can find significant difference between both (NS & CBR250R that is) Acceleration wise, I personally think, the power build-up & seat of pants feel is more in sync with the R15, though the thrust at ~8K is better. I love peaky engine & absolutely loved revving the NS. I think optimistic speedo is at play here. |
Originally Posted by F150
(Post 2976960)
Congratulations on your purchase !! Nice color. Pulsar has always been my favorite but the tail lamp on the 200 NS is very similar to the pulsar 135 LS. That is the only downer. Reading the report, I felt that I am reading a magazine. Pretty impressive with the pictures and those sentences. I am not sure if its bad or good, but it is not one of those TBHP ownership reviews.clap: |
Originally Posted by sam_sant2005
(Post 2977012)
OMG ! Did you say 145kmph ??? 140+ was thrilling but scary in my 220 F despite its 150+ kgs. Wondering how scary this lil' one is !!! By the way what is the rated top speed? |
Absolutely right. That is the sole reason this bike is not much inspiring to the eyes and reminds of the paltry 135 LS. Bajaj either shouldnt have had the 135 at all or should have really remodelled the NS. To me, this one reason is a deal breaker, especially the look from the side and rear. |
Originally Posted by ebonho
(Post 2977099)
I think from what I am hearing the Duke is the slowest amongst the four (the others being the CBR, the NS, and the R15). Except for the Duke, all the other 3 show upwards of 145 indicated. Or maybe they just have better speedos. :uncontrol I am wondering whether to put a smaller rear sprocket on the Duke and make it also join this elite club. |
Originally Posted by pulsurge
(Post 2977190)
We had a friendly drag of the CBR and the P200...and the CBR simply gobbled up the NS in acceleration- so I can vouch it isn't as fast or actually faster than the CBR ;) The NS might do 149 or even 150+....difference is the time it takes. The CBR nearly hits 150 in the 5th gear itself before hitting the rev-limiter (I've done 148 in 5th before hitting trucker traffic at 158 kph in 6th) and it will do 150 everytime you want it to. How easy does the 200 do 149 needs to be seen? |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2977227)
True. It should, otherwise why would anyone pay 70,000 more? uncontrol: ================== Cheers! Preetam |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2977227)
Thanks pugram! You seem to have missed the "small" part where I was going on rambling about how the bike looks! lol: |
Originally Posted by pulsurge
(Post 2977317)
Another small observation- pls do correct if am wrong, the NS does 70 @ 5000 rpm in top gear and the CBR does 80 at the same rpm. Amply clear that the gearing is slightly shorter to what you have said. Anyways- getting back to the review. Had kept it for reading at relaxed pace. Very very well written. And congrats on the ownership. |
Originally Posted by ebonho
(Post 2977374)
@Preetam I realise this is a theoretical argument (though I have ridden quite a lot with a test NS to know different), but my question is this: If the overall top end of the Duke 200 is the same as the 5th gear top speed of a 200NS, and If the Duke 200 accelerates much quicker than a 200NS. Does it not stand to reason that the 200NS can never catch the Duke in 5th - even given an infinite endless road? Assuming of course that both start together. :) |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2977486)
The duke will stay ahead in 5th or maybe just neck in neck, if you dont mind a blown 200 NS engine on an infinite open road! In test conditions the the KTM should be ahead. However, I have taken on the occassional KTM on the road, and when rolling, the KTM doesnt pull away as fast or at all, if the NS is in the right gear. Also another simple explanation is that the Duke in India is limited to a 138. :deadhorse |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2977227)
I rarely go to Kolkata though, for most part, I am in Bangalore. Hope to catch up sometime. |
I agree in totality. The CBR is way more refined than the NS and feels more planted at higher speeds partly because of the fairing and partly because of the weight of the bike. The price difference is evident in terms of fit and finish, but the Honda after sales has been playing up a lot lately. In terms of power delivery, the CBR is more linear and the gearbox is way more slick, sometimes too slick. The R15 holds till redlining in 3rd gear and then loses it to the NS. The exhaust of the NS is quite meaty beyond 8K rpm, true that. Aural pleasure when compared to the Duke's exhaust. Speedo is definitely a bit optimistic, but I could easlily hold a CBR250 at bike's length all through the dash. |
at 149 but with a bit more of a push and slightly less weight on board, indicated speed can go to the CBR's claimed top speed of 155 Kmph, no doubt there. At 149 Kmph, the dial showed 9700 RPM. |
The duke will most definitely match the ceeber in terms of acceleration and in the city, will be faster. |
Originally Posted by ebonho That is, every time there is a break in traffic, an opening, the Duke is gone, and the NS telescopes just as the next slow down comes up. |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2977227)
Haha! Thanks Ashwin! If you aren't there in my fb list, please send me a F Req. The metaphors are inspired by the Great Jeremy Clarkson! 149 Kmph definitely had some error, but I will like to point out that this was on a slightly sloping decline all through from 140 onwards and it takes some time getting there. If I was a little more brave and didnt weigh on the higher side of a quintal, the bike would have done 155 Kph, I do not have a shadow of doubt about that. As far as Bajaj mechanics in the city are concerned, I trust no one other than Auto Service, Banshankari. They are the best in business. I get it done from there, do check them out if you haven't already. Cheers! Preetam |
Originally Posted by ashwin.terminat
(Post 2977628)
I need to watch Top Gear more often. :D Probably a little fairing might help the bike reach slightly higher speeds too! For the short while that I rode the NS, I did find it slightly weird at the rider's seat, particularly the knees, but maybe that's because I was just riding the bike for the first time. I was quite surprised at Bajaj deciding to go with Eurogrip tyres when the industry norm was MRF. Glad to see you went for the Pirelli, although I have my reservations on how effective that may be on Bangalore (if I may call them so)roads, we have nails, staple pins lying everywhere, so a soft compound tyre is always prone to a puncture. :Frustrati Also, Venkat's Auto Service is only for Bajaj Bikes. I have a Hero Honda Hunk, any idea where I can drop if off for service? The guys at Prakash Motors don't even know to tune the carb, they claim that a varying RPM needle is normal! |
Originally Posted by Shiv_1984
(Post 2978411)
I started with a Pulsar way back in 2005 and bought a 180 then. Man, it was a head turner, but since then lot many competitors have barged into the arena, leaving it no more a one machine show. I own a P200 now and sport 35k kms on the ODO. What delights me most is the maintenance cost. I wouldn't have spent more than 5-7k till now including my paid services. I am very happy with my Pulsar and surely feel, its still the king of Roads no matter what may come. I must say, Honda bikes are really good and their refinement shows here too. Coming to PNS, it looks cool, sporty and much more sound technologically indeed, but i expected something revolutionary in the looks department. I agree that looks are subjective, but i guess no one would disagree on one point. IT COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER, MUCH BETTER. Nevertheless, its a gem of an engine. All the best and happy motoring ![]() |
Originally Posted by preetam_KORG
(Post 2981661)
Sorry Ashwin, all I have owned are bajaj bikes, so I dont know of a good Hero mech in the city. However, will be in the lookout, will let you know if I come across someone. |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:19. |