Team-BHP > Motorbikes
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
11,044 views
Old 11th December 2007, 15:02   #1
Senior - BHPian
 
gemithomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 2,366
Thanked: 143 Times
RTR or HUNK !!??

Was just looking at these two bikes and wanted to know which would be worth buying. I'm looking at the following aspects listed as per priority

1. Comfortable Ride (I dont want to have a paining back after even a short drive. ASpects i look here include the Shocks and the sitting position)

2. F.E (I need something that gives me something above 55 km/l consistently for atleat 2 yrs)

3. V.F.M (looking at what you get for what you pay, things that make you feel good as well as things that are good to use)

4. A.S.S (I just done want the service centre guy trying to convince me that i am imagining of an issue or the usual crap like its modern technology and thus it will have all these issues...common man i need someone who can take care of my bike and sort out issues efficiently)

5. Any other pros and cons of each of the above bikes.

I dont plan to keep this for more than 3-4 years. I saw that hunk gives you a 3 yr/40K km warrrany, Does RTR also have something simmilar?

Thanks in advance to all of you.

T-BHP ROCKS!!!
gemithomas is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 15:19   #2
BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Delhi
Posts: 509
Thanked: 108 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by gemithomas View Post
I dont plan to keep this for more than 3-4 years. I saw that hunk gives you a 3 yr/40K km warrrany, Does RTR also have something simmilar?
Selling a two wheeler is no easy job! Simply on this point alone i would suggest a HH. As a Honda would anyday hold its price well compared to TVS.

Comfort..no clue, but for all else including driving pleasure, its RTR anyday.

Elito
Elito11 is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 15:36   #3
Team-BHP Support
 
Rtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 5,770
Thanked: 359 Times

well, all I have to go with are the various reviews in the magazines. And we all know how much to believe those

From the tone of your post, I have a feeling the Hunk (ugh) would be more suitable for you. It's a physically larger bike, hence, should be more comfortable.

But only one way to find out for sure, that is to take a test ride. And remember to post the ride review here.
Rtech is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 15:58   #4
Senior - BHPian
 
Technocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: GTA
Posts: 14,813
Thanked: 2,700 Times

Like Rtech I recently read a comparo between RTR & hunk & it seems Hunk fits your requirement more that the RTR.

Ona personal front the Hunk's tanbk does look attractive but I liked the rear of Xtreme better.

Go for Hunk, Thank god its not named Kareina or something
Technocrat is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 16:39   #5
Senior - BHPian
 
VJ_MAVRICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,239
Thanked: 34 Times

Hero Honda's products are better than most of its competetiors. Heard that RTR gear box gives into noise in the long run after a decent cruise of KM's (Not sure ..heard from friends who own it...so cant aunthenticate)..
In my opinion Hunk is better than RTR based on the company,service,spare parts etc.
VJ_MAVRICK is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 18:20   #6
BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: amritsar
Posts: 71
Thanked: 0 Times

Quote:
1. Comfortable Ride (I dont want to have a paining back after even a short drive. ASpects i look here include the Shocks and the sitting position)
Hunk is winner here as RTR has more Sport but still comfortable sitting position
Quote:
2. F.E (I need something that gives me something above 55 km/l consistently for atleat 2 yrs)
Hunk will be winner here but BOTH WILL NOT GIVE THIS FE it will be between 50 - 55 for both but Hunk is winner because RTR is more performance oriented bike , it has Technically More CC to the engine and off course it is really fun to rip RTR !! so less FE

Quote:
3. V.F.M (looking at what you get for what you pay, things that make you feel good as well as things that are good to use)
Definately RTR is winner because for just 2.5 - 3 k extra you will get lot of goodies like digital meter, adjustable handle bar ,Petal Disk ,Led.

Resale might be low for other brands as compared to honda but dont forgrt you pay more at time of buying it ( Honda Bikes are always costly for any range )


Quote:
4. A.S.S (I just done want the service centre guy trying to convince me that i am imagining of an issue or the usual crap like its modern technology and thus it will have all these issues...common man i need someone who can take care of my bike and sort out issues efficiently)
TVS and HH are equally good at giving after sale services
Quote:
5. Any other pros and cons of each of the above bikes.
HUNK

Pros: very smooth engine , brand value , good looks and new product
Cons : not value for money , lag behind in goodies as compared to competetion


RTR

Pros: totally performance machine , Good looking , Best Handling !!

Cons : Small size .



So RTR is best choice for performance oriented needs and HUNK over all Nice product !




I hope it helps and yes I have first hand experience of both Bikes

Jatinder Singh
drkhalsa is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 19:42   #7
BHPian
 
ravi@64bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 602
Thanked: 10 Times

gemithomas,
Hunk satisfies all your needs mentioned above. Though RTR offers better goodies than Hunk, I would prefer Hunk over RTR. The engine of Hunk is a gem and is better than RTR anyday.
ravi@64bhp is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 19:57   #8
Senior - BHPian
 
Mpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,409
Thanked: 1,730 Times

Seems like the RTR is too extreme for you, why not consider the regular Apache 150 then.
Mpower is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 21:11   #9
Senior - BHPian
 
phamilyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 5,968
Thanked: 4,642 Times

1. Comfortable Ride (I dont want to have a paining back after even a short drive. ASpects i look here include the Shocks and the sitting position)
- Both are decent here. RTR has a sportier stance which your back should be able to support.After that it keeps back better (since its taut, no slouching unlike car).

2. F.E (I need something that gives me something above 55 km/l consistently for atleat 2 yrs)
- What?! a Fusion/Palio owner saying that?

3. V.F.M (looking at what you get for what you pay, things that make you feel good as well as things that are good to use)
- Both would be boss. 50k ki bike mein bacche ki jaan loge?

4. A.S.S (I just done want the service centre guy trying to convince me that i am imagining of an issue or the usual crap like its modern technology and thus it will have all these issues...common man i need someone who can take care of my bike and sort out issues efficiently)
- HH is normally superb. TVS is decent. You can check out your nearby fellows. That is a very local thing. Crazy driver can help here.

5. Any other pros and cons of each of the above bikes.
- RTR is faster. Much more bhp. Like its farkles. Its very well eaten up cbzx sales imo. hunk hasnt realy caught on in delhi so surely rtr is doin somethin good to maintain itself

I dont plan to keep this for more than 3-4 years. I saw that hunk gives you a 3 yr/40K km warrrany, Does RTR also have something simmilar?
- 24 months.
TVS APACHE Review

Last edited by normally_crazy : 18th December 2007 at 23:59. Reason: Extra Smilies - Read the rules buddy - 2 smilies is the norm
phamilyman is offline  
Old 11th December 2007, 21:18   #10
BHPian
 
turbo_v12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thane
Posts: 457
Thanked: Once

RTR...anytime...I know I am a TVS fan, but the Hunk is more of a tuned out Unicorn than an X-Treme.
turbo_v12 is offline  
Old 12th December 2007, 22:51   #11
Senior - BHPian
 
gemithomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 2,366
Thanked: 143 Times

thanks a lot for all your comments. Just one doubt does the hunk have the same CBZ X engine? I've tries the X-treme but was not that impresed. THe Power delivery is at higher rpms and the engine knocks at every gear change unless you keep the rpms higher. I also felt that the engine was not that smooth. I mean you could really feel the metal moving inside the engine (dont know how to explain. Hope you understand). I've heard the RTR gives its power at much lower rpms
gemithomas is offline  
Old 13th December 2007, 00:07   #12
Senior - BHPian
 
phamilyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 5,968
Thanked: 4,642 Times

If you felt that way about RTR, kindly consider p220/p200/zma

or buy a second hand TB - power from lower down. 40ish mileage and uber comfort
phamilyman is offline  
Old 13th December 2007, 00:31   #13
BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chandigarh
Posts: 69
Thanked: 20 Times

May I suggest the Unicorn, It fulfills all your criteria.
wolg is offline  
Old 13th December 2007, 10:23   #14
BHPian
 
RufRoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 259
Thanked: 28 Times

@GemiThomas: How about the price difference between the two, just to get an idea of how much of a premium HH charges.
RufRoc is offline  
Old 13th December 2007, 12:04   #15
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,440
Thanked: 320 Times

Sorry for offtopic but after riding a stock RXZ 5 speeder, felt like all these 4 stroke machines are waste of money, as a nicely maintained Kari and P180 also eat dust from that bike donno what a Porting and digital programable CDI will do to that.
My 2 cents if you are willing to spend money and wants real perfomance machine buy a 2nds RXZ and show durt to these so called perfomance big machine.
Ajaybiz is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks