Quote:
Originally Posted by hemanthisgreat i feel if you had the high beam on, you would have seen the barricades. Its always a good idea to have high beam on, if the roads are not properly lit. |
I think its probably not a great idea to drive around with high-beams on in the city. (Infact, i think its illegal within city limits).
However, i will agree that driving with your low-beams on within the city is a good idea. A lot of people say its not required since there is decent street lighting, but i feel it definitely gives you better visibility - and if your headlights are aligned well ( see here) it doesnt cause an inconvenience to anyone else. Quote:
Originally Posted by anurag_p80 Rehaan, IMO the human eye is more attuned to identify movement. So, if it was a person crossing the road, it is better than an even chance that Nikhil or one of his friends would have spotted it. Inanimate objects in the shadows are actually more likely to be missed than moving objects, stray animals or people crossing the road. |
Interesting viewpoint anurag, and you do have a point. Certain receptors in our eyes, mostly in our peripheral vision are attuned to low-light vision, and (some type of rods, or is it the specialized ganglion cells?) recognize movement - maybe even recognizing diagonal lines? - i dont remember the details too well.
Maybe if the barrier was moving a little it might have caught his attention, however, things that move can also move erratically and more into your way. Theres two sides of the coin - so i wouldnt really say its a great excuse/reason - but an interesting point for sure.
Sriturl - i 100% agree with your post. Well said! Quote:
Originally Posted by sriturl Nikhil,
...
...
Reminds me of something similar : I wore my mother's watch when I was kid to school, (I was playing a woman in a play), and lost the watch, and till this day my mother didn't buy a new watch for herself. |
...but the question is, howcome you havent bought a new watch for her till this day?
cya
R |