Re: Why I love the sub 4 metre SUVs Quote:
Originally Posted by smartcat Regarding my new "question 3", I'm adding pictures of Xylo and Scopio - the relative bonnet size difference is much clearer with these two cars. How did Mahindra magically fit in the mHawk/mEagle engine into the (visually) tiny engine bay of the Xylo? Why does the same engine need a larger engine bay/bonnet in the Scorpio? Attachment 1003782 Attachment 1003783 | Quote:
Originally Posted by captain.torque Xylo being an MUV has a transversely mounted engine or in simple words the engine is placed horizontally to accommodate more interior space whereas in SUV's a long bonnet adds to the macho look and is a must so the engine is placed longitudinally or vertically.
Please correct me if I am wrong friends. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reinhard Absolutely right. That horizontally mounted engine is the primary contributor to a car (MPV) with same total length having a significantly larger cabin space compared to an SUV. In other words, known as a "cab forward" design. |
Guys, the Xylo is a RWD vehicle with a longitudinally mounted drivetrain. It is NOT a FWD. The XUV is the one with the car-like FWD and the transverse drivetrain. Same case with the Innova and the Fortuner, both are FR (Front engine, Rear drive) layout.
Quite simply, it is all about looks. An SUV is meant to look tough and capable, so it is designed with a longer bonnet (ie a longer crash section) and a body that accommodates fewer people in more luxury. An MUV is designed from the get-go to be more spacious at the expense of aesthetics. Hence, the short bonnet (to aid in traffic driving) and the longer cabin (more space).
Also, If you look the engine bay of a Xylo, you'll notice that it looks closely packed, while the bay in a Scorpio looks rather airy. The original Scorpio was designed for a 2.6L old-school, simple DI diesel engine (NEF2600 I think), and only got the smaller 2.2L mHawk engine later in life. The Xylo which came after the Scorpio was designed for smaller engines, so they could make do with a smaller engine bay and add that space to the cabin.
But then, the original Safari came with a 2L engine and had a huge engine bay, so the best bet would be that SUVs have longer bonnets so they can look a lot bigger and proportionate. MUVs don't have to deal with that. Sportier vehicles have always traded utility for aesthetics.
As for the spare wheel placement, I think the best combination would be a rear mounted spare wheel that cold swing down to ground level when needed. Why hasn't anyone thought of that? Swing the wheel down, change tyres and swing it back up. If designed correctly, it could even be a step to get into the back.
Last edited by vivekgk : 6th July 2013 at 00:54.
|