Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO Tom & Ray from Cartalk have an interesting discussion on this - link.
The most important question is, what is the difference between the levels when hot or cold? Answer = ~100 ml. |
That was a very interesting post. And quite right; the manufacturer consensus now seems to be to check engine oil when the car is at operating temperature.
However, apart from that, I found myself questioning what they say, and you will too, if you bear with me here please.
1. Quantified, Personal Experience
I had the same experience as vnabhi.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vnabhi I checked my Fiesta in both conditions. When I checked on Sunday morning on a cold engine, the dipstick showed a level of 1/4th between the minimum and maximum levels. I was kind of surprised because I'd filled up Mobil Synthetic for the first time around 2500 kms back.
I checked again after driving 15 kms to work today, around 45 minutes after reaching office. It showed almost at maximum level. I was kind of releived to see this.
Given this case, I wonder if the difference is only 100 ml, as claimed by Ford. |
When I checked my Vento cold, the level was at the edge of the lowest point on the dipstick. Now, it had been a month since I last checked, when it was ok, so this psyched me. I opened the manual and read the 'check at normal operating temperature' recommendation. So, next day, after a drive, I waited for a few minutes & checked - this time, the dipstick level was bang in the middle. Now, the VW manual says the following:
- my cold engine level of dipstick: 1 liter engine oil MUST be filled
- my warm engine level of dipstick: 0.5 liter engine oil CAN be filled
In other words, top up was not required at my warm engine location, but that's not the point here.
The point here was that the difference between the two readings, as per VW's recommendations of the amount of oil that can be added, is not 100ml, but a good 500ml.
2. 100ml difference from cold to hot is NOT what the expert said
The expert in the blog refers to user behavior, where they stop at a pump & check engine oil, and mentions that oil could be at the top of the engine and all of it may not have come back to the sump, but inspite of that, the difference between the two readings would be 1/8th of a quart. He is not talking of a cold reading vs. a hot reading. He is talking of a hot reading with all oil back in the sump, vs. some of the oil still at the top of the engine.
So, the 1/8th of a quart (118ml, to be precise) he mentions is about how precisely you calculate the oil levels when the engine is hot.
Needless to say, a recalibration that takes into account all oil in sump (or not) is impossible. The only recalibration spoken about is simply a cold engine or a hot engine, and the leeway we have, that the expert refers to, is in how long we wait before we take a reading.
So, the blog was very interesting, until the end when they got their conclusions wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by techiecal Yes,in cold countries, but in our temperate climate you can easily verify that any difference in the dip stick levels on a cold engine and warm engine are not noticeable. Having said that, a vehicles operating temperature will be more or less the same whether it is running in a tropical country or a cold country. Hence, to factor out the ambient temperature manufacturers suggest checking at operating temperatures. |
Ah, yes, I was just taking a logical track bearing in mind the Delhi summers & winters. But an interesting thing I discovered in the manual was that at normal operating temperature, the engine oil is at 80-110 degrees Celsius. So, guess that accounts for the difference in cold engine vs. warm engine readings I mentioned above, inspite of our generally warm weather.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggu Well i stated the facts that i know off. Have you measured the difference in oil dip stick level after warming up? Is it (the variation) same and consistent with all vehicles? And more importantly how much is it (quantity)?
So please read a post and understand clearly what it means before going ballistic on someones experience. |
I apologise if I offended you - wasn't my intent. And I didn't really go ballistic, so again, sorry if that was your takeaway.
You didn't state any facts in your post, so not sure what you're referring to, but let me elaborate on the point I was trying to make.
I believe there is a place for personal experiences, more so of someone with your level of experience, but that place is in the subjective realm, say, your reading of a car's dynamics or daily life with a particular car. However, this is a technical topic, and here, there is only place for facts and, if at all, quantifiable personal experiences. So, steering a technical conversation into the 'i've been doing this for years' may not be appropriate, at least in my reading, and the reason I mentioned your moderator status was not to take a jibe at you but to point out that you have a greater responsibility than normal members to maintain the quality of conversations here.
Taking an example of your response in the current post, for example:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggu Why while engine is cold? I don't like to burn my finger or hands to start with. |
That is not really the science of engine oil checks, and for that matter, I've never seen anyone's fingers or hands burn while checking engine oil - but, I digress. All we're trying to do in this thread is to figure out the absolutely correct method of checking oil, not whether that burns peoples hands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggu Another interesting fact usually the dip stick will have about 1/2 to 3/4 liter as range and this is good enough buffer. They are designed also with ample buffers, if an engine takes 3 liter, it can run under full stress even with say 2.5 liters. |
Again, you're narrating commonsense and accepted knowledge, and while I could be wrong, I believe the point of discussions on technical sections of the forum is to dabble in referenced facts and to expand our understanding. Take GTO's post above, as an example; made us question everything, and made us think on the fundamentals. And that is all I meant to point out in my original post.
Once again, apologies. I do hope you now understand where I was coming from.