Never write off a W-163 ML! I have a different take on the W-163 ML (M-Class renamed to GLE-Class). But I admit there is a caveat, I am temporarily in the US. I agree that the first-generation W-163 MLs introduced in 1997 (designed and produced in Alabama) did have issues (the most obvious being in the quality of finish), and higher instances of lemons, so I would avoid the first few years of the W-163. My non-lemon, 2003 model ML-500 (V8, 4966 cc, 288 hp), with the huge spare market for the model in the US, hits a sweet spot.
I was in the market for an SUV in the US a few years back, primarily for interstate travel. I started the search with new cars or still in warranty options, costing under Rs. 15 Lks like the Toyota Rav4, Jeep compass, Ford Escape, and Nissan Rogue. Then I expanded the search to include older models within extended warranty (sticking close to the same budget), like the Toyota 4Runners, Jeep Wrangler and Ford Explorer. That is when I came across an older ML-350, and it won my heart the first time I test drove the ML (I admit the Mercedes brand holds a cherished spot in my Indian heart). The ML-350 was much older, out of warranty, and in a completely different league. Though I checked out many MLs before I settled, it was love at first drive.
I weighed my inhibitions on the notoriously expensive Mercedes maintenance, against the ample depreciated inventory of ML’s, and the robust spare part market for the decade-old model in the US. Though the V6 ML-320/350s (V6, 3724 cc, 232 hp) got me hooked, it was the V8’s that blew me away: the ML-500 (V8, 4966 cc, 288 hp) and the ML-55 AMG (V8, 5439 cc, 342 hp). And the love affair with my ML500 is still fresh after a few years. I justify the slightly ;-) higher annual maintenance of the ML (over the annual depreciation of a new Toyota), as the price of love. Given a choice, I would love to get my V8, 5-liter engine, body on frame W-163, ML-500, back to India when I return, but its not worth the pain considering the SUV/MUV’s I could buy in India for the same expense. |