Quote:
Originally Posted by acidkill
However, i have noticed that no manufacturer has developed either of the following strategies:
1.Supercharged or dual turbo version of these engines for deployment in larger variants |
Simply answer is cost. Plus the durability of engine. Quote:
Originally Posted by acidkill 2. Inline Five Cylinder or I5 variants of the same engine for deployment in larger cars |
The engine bay has limited space. Two problems here.
1. L5 will definitely need to be elongated engine bay plus a RWD configuration. And cost of suspension development will be much higher for comfortable ride. We all know why Mustang uses age old technology at rear even after being so expensive. Tuner company have added multilink at rear in Mustang. and we all know their price.
2. L5 if used transversely will need more modification to front suspension and drive-train system. I think Volvo uses this and we all know what Volvo costs.
3. Cost of developing a complete new chassis for larger engine. Quote:
Originally Posted by acidkill Inline two Cylinder or I2 variants of the same engine for deployment in small cars |
This is workable. But question is will People buy it.?
I was thinking about this too, And i created an "Available Engine option" thread somewhere and up till now there is little response.. Cooper Corp, (Not Cooper of Mini Fame) an indian company manufactures a two cylinder turbocharged engine which develops 55bhp and 110Nm of torque.
Now this is good on paper. Now problem will be to develop a new gear box which will put those horses on wheels.
Again Cost of development is the main question. |