Re: Our Raydon: A Renault Kwid 1.0L AMT joins the family. EDIT: 4 year & 40,000 km update Quote:
Originally Posted by padmrajravi I am not sure if that is a good idea. An AMT will always have these problems. The better alternative is to do a clutch overhaul now and buy a proper AT car one year down the line. Or buy a proper AT now itself. The Suzuki AMTs are not saints either. Most of them suffer from this inconsistent clutch bite when it wears out. All you are getting when you buy a Ignis AMT is a car with a new clutch and same AMT technology. You still have to suffer your life with the AMT. I suggest dropping this AMT confusion altogether and getting a proper AT next year. For now, you can overhaul Kwid's clutch. I am assuming it won't cost you more than 30k to overhaul its clutch. |
I partly agree with what you are saying. However, there's a couple of reasons apart from the AMT which might make the Ignis worth it too. Here they are:
- Larger 1.2 NA 4 pot petrol has had a better track record being paired to AMTs than the smaller mills from Maruti which have been notorious in the earlier years especially
- The Ignis is obviously better built and better equipped in terms of safety than the Kwid. There's not an ounce of doubt about it
- The Kwid continues to spring up issues apart from the AMT too. It tends to stall randomly when the fuel level hits reserve (primary fuel pump seems to be the culprit), there's a very pronounced wobble at slow speeds despite having the tyres changed and the bearings checked and lastly, major rusting issues on the monocoque partly due to external impact and partly due to quality.
I am not at all confident of this car holding up beyond the 5 year mark. If I want to sell it, now is the right time I feel personally. Anyways, I will revisit this decision after having a TD of the Ignis AMT.  |