Team-BHP > In-Car Entertainment
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
8,899 views
Old 29th May 2009, 11:12   #16
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 25,199
Thanked: 9,307 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricky_1605 View Post
now i am confused between pioneer and kenwood HU? can anyone tell me which one will be better (with model number please) in 6-8k bracket?
Kenwood is supposed to have better sound. Pioneer is more available.
navin is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 11:29   #17
Senior - BHPian
 
greenhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: KL-01
Posts: 7,745
Thanked: 4,402 Times

8k should also get you a very basic Alpine HU - best SQ, build quality and output power , but features are non existent
greenhorn is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 22:44   #18
Senior - BHPian
 
JayD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin! At last
Posts: 3,236
Thanked: 2,568 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
Kenwood is supposed to have better sound. Pioneer is more available.
Having heard both, i can say that kenwood does sound better than pioneer. But again, the perception of quality differs from person to person. The pio is all about low's and high's, (dhinchak to be precise) whereas the kenwood sounded very neutral to me. There was equal emphasis on all frequencies.

I'd say, go for a kenwood 5039, or if you use the ipod, the 6539(if you can find it) and a good set of comps, maybe bull. You can go for a sub and amp later on.
JayD is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 23:01   #19
Senior - BHPian
 
abhinav.gupta88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Delhi , India
Posts: 4,092
Thanked: 325 Times

Contact LBM for some auditions .
He will help you with the install as well.
abhinav.gupta88 is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 23:23   #20
Senior - BHPian
 
DerAlte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 8,069
Thanked: 2,919 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayD View Post
... The pio is all about low's and high's, (dhinchak to be precise) whereas the kenwood sounded very neutral to me. ...
That is not a fair and equal comparison. Did you hear it in the same setup? Quite likely not. Pios are not that as bad as you make it out to be. In a blind compare, I am sure you will not be able to pick it out.
DerAlte is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 23:28   #21
Senior - BHPian
 
JayD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin! At last
Posts: 3,236
Thanked: 2,568 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAlte View Post
That is not a fair and equal comparison. Did you hear it in the same setup? Quite likely not. Pios are not that as bad as you make it out to be. In a blind compare, I am sure you will not be able to pick it out.
Not identical, but similar. I am a looong time pio user, and have been through more than 5 pio HU's. I know what i'm talking about.

Anyways, i think y missed this point i made in my earlier post. I just mentioned what i felt. That's all

Quote:
But again, the perception of quality differs from person to person
JayD is offline  
Old 31st May 2009, 00:02   #22
Senior - BHPian
 
greenhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: KL-01
Posts: 7,745
Thanked: 4,402 Times

I've heard a lot of pio+ jbl installs, and all of them needed the HU to be toned down before they sounded tolerable, and even then, you can never get the highs to sound right. But a kenwood + jbl setup i heard sounded refreshingly neutral with a flat eq
greenhorn is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks