Team-BHP
(
https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/)
-
Et Cetera
(
https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/et-cetera/)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rehaan
(Post 651461)
WOW! Phenomenal shot!!
Were you on the shore?
|
Water surface pattern will change then. No Rehaan?
Some more still:
Those are all vessel on the horizon?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudra Sen
(Post 651552)
Those are all vessel on the horizon?
|
Yes sir...
(twentytwenty)
Quote:
Mayavi  : 2. That helps you create what you originally saw but could not capture.
|
Would help if I can tweak my own skills so I get what I see. To get what I see is the idea, and my pursuit.
To shoot something & then tweak it would, IMO, make the photographer more a digital artist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by condor
(Post 651575)
Would help if I can tweak my own skills so I get what I see. To get what I see is the idea, and my pursuit.
To shoot something & then tweak it would, IMO, make the photographer more a digital artist.
|
Could'nt agree more!!:thumbs up
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1self
(Post 651550)
Some more still:
|
Like the 2nd one. How close were you from the bird? Which lens did you use?
Quote:
Originally Posted by guyonblackybx
(Post 651625)
Like the 2nd one. How close were you from the bird? Which lens did you use?
|
Was about 2 meters away. ALL my shots are from a point-&-shoot camera. It is a Pentax Optio 550, 5MP, 5x optical & capable of user specfic settings.
Pentax Optio 550 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review
Some Night Shots from the same camera:
Quote:
Originally Posted by condor
(Post 651575)
Would help if I can tweak my own skills so I get what I see. To get what I see is the idea, and my pursuit.
To shoot something & then tweak it would, IMO, make the photographer more a digital artist.
|
Digital consumer cameras have a long way to go before they can get anywhere close to a human eye. Digital cameras lack the dynamic range of human eyes and when the dynamic range varies too much, what you see is not what you get on camera no matter how skilled you are.
@1self - loved the 1st pic ! Which city is it ?
Btw, Is the camera KOREAN ?? :p
Well; here are 2 from my side :
Wondering how this will look in perspective ?
See this :
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjbiju
(Post 649201)
People in Pune might recognize this place!
|
Thats Splendour Country Club at Khadakvalsa right? Jeez, it looks so fancy in the pic!
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkanitkar
(Post 651785)
Wondering how this will look in perspective ?
|
Loved the 1st pic- was thinking what it would be, when the second pic came to view. :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by mail4ajo
(Post 652049)
|
Nice macros buddy keep clicking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by condor
(Post 651339)
1self, beautiful shots. Quote:
1self : I have NEVER used Photoshop or any other enhancement tool in my life. Don't intend to either.:)
Nature is WAYYYY better than any enhancement man can come up with.
| Agree. I am trying to get good shots without any digital tweaking.
|
Hmm, let us see. So... you are shooting raw and then you are posting it without any processing, just convert to jpg and resize. That indicates supreme confidence in your shooting technique. Therefore, I checked yor exif. The F-stop is F/2.8 and exposure compension is 0 and the camera is Pentax Optio 550.
This is where things get really confusing. The camera in question doesn't have a raw mode. That means you couldn't have got a natural output, the default in-camera processing engine would have applied the automatic post-processing on your image. If you had raw mode, the camera will leave it alone and allow you to use much superior Photoshop to do -postprocessing. But in your case the camera did the post-processing without asking you for any input. That displays supreme confidence in your on-camera processing engine. I see you haven't applied any exposure compensation, wish I could trust my dSLR metering that much, that too in such a confusing lighting situation. Again you have full confidence in your exposure meter. I am not saying it is a bad thing, looks like you really trust your camera to do everything correctly. Only thing I didn't understand is this, why pick F/2.8 for such deep landscape shot, I agree your 1/1.8 sensor has much deeper DOF than any dSLR, but still isn't that taking a chance? Were you targeting a softer effect?
| All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 19:56. | |
