Doubt - Maximum Resolution Pics

Gordon · 12th March 2006, 13:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by binz

Hey......if you take a pic at 5 mp without stability,dont expect it to be clear.To take the best pics from your cam,buy a tripod;it really helps.

If the shutter is at 1/400th speed, then normal minor shakes while doing point-and-shoot are not recorded.

Quote:

Originally Posted by binz

Next turn of your flash.

Whats the use of flash in broad daylight?!

ksethuram · 13th March 2006, 11:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon

If the shutter is at 1/400th speed, then normal minor shakes while doing point-and-shoot are not recorded.

Whats the use of flash in broad daylight?!

Yes shakes can be prevented but with a compromise to picture quality. To get good quality picture it is better to stick to ISO 100 or 200.
Usage of flash in daylight is advisible but only when shooting portrait's or close up's.
As binz said it is better to use a tripod whereever you can.

Gordon, I tried the same way u said and had good clarity in my D70 with 6MP JPEG fine. With RAW did not try but it would only increase the clarity further.
Sorry to tell you that Sony lag's way behind Canon and Nikon in digital imaging. Just their strong brand name and marketing which fetches them sales. If you compare the same MP pictures form NIKON/CANON to SONY and blow up you will find the diffference. I have personally compared my Canon 2MP camera to my friend's Sony 2MP (to mention canon was cheaper of the two), be it indoor, outdoor or night my pictures are better than his.

Rehaan · 13th March 2006, 11:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by ksethuram

Sorry to tell you that Sony lag's way behind Canon and Nikon in digital imaging. Just their strong brand name and marketing which fetches them sales.

Not to mention the fact that all their consumer cams produce hugely saturated images. (Like the "vivid" mode of other cameras)

cya
R

tsk1979 · 13th March 2006, 12:07

here you go.
This is a 100% crop. No size reduction

BuRnT RuBbEr · 13th March 2006, 16:51

the image compression is playing the role here. Try raw format. the pics will not have grains, atleast at ISO-100.

image compression is known to play devil in photography. that is the very reason that digi-slr' work on RAW format!

And no, the CCD' are not overrated. it is the size of the CCD that plays an important role. slr' have larger CCD', allowing more light to be captured per pixel.

tsk1979 · 13th March 2006, 16:53

As long as you follow the 1/Focal length rule, your images will be stable. I usually follow 1/2*FL. when I shoot at 300mm, I make sure the shutter speed is faster than 1/600.

13th March 2006, 12:07	#19
tsk1979 Team-BHP Support Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 23,717 Thanked: 22,825 Times View My Garage	here you go. This is a 100% crop. No size reduction
	() Thanks

13th March 2006, 16:51	#20
BuRnT RuBbEr BHPian Join Date: May 2005 Location: DL 1 Posts: 367 Thanked: 13 Times	the image compression is playing the role here. Try raw format. the pics will not have grains, atleast at ISO-100. image compression is known to play devil in photography. that is the very reason that digi-slr' work on RAW format! And no, the CCD' are not overrated. it is the size of the CCD that plays an important role. slr' have larger CCD', allowing more light to be captured per pixel.
	() Thanks

13th March 2006, 16:53	#21
tsk1979 Team-BHP Support Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 23,717 Thanked: 22,825 Times View My Garage	As long as you follow the 1/Focal length rule, your images will be stable. I usually follow 1/2*FL. when I shoot at 300mm, I make sure the shutter speed is faster than 1/600.
	() Thanks