Re: The Valley Run @ Aamby Valley Air Strip. 25th & 26th Jan, 2014 Hi,
First off, let me thank the organisers (all of them - Elite Octane, N1, IARC as well as Aamby valley and others) for organising the event and keeping the sport alive. I understand and appreciate that it was a huge effort that went into organising the event and conducting it successfully. Hats off to the Marshals, Officials, volunteers and all involved with the conduct of the event. I am sure it is not just me but each one of the participants appreciates and thanks you guys for huge amount of effort and time that you guys have put in. Much mid-night oil would have been burnt and all concerned would have reported at unearthly hours in order to ensure that the event was conducted successfully. Much appreciated and total respect!
I was there with team-mates and spent a wonderful weekend with friends from all over the country. We had a successful weekend i.e. we got decent timings and carried home a bagful of trophies so we have every reason to be happy and we are happy with the results. I am therefore not complaining but am listing out what I thought can be done better. It is not a gripe but suggestions / constructive criticism. I mean no offence and hope that none is taken.
1. The track being an air-strip would have been wonderful but for the dust on it. I and my team-mates noted that the organisers did water the surrounding areas to keep the dust down but it did not really help. Perhaps watering more freqently might help. An alternative is to position volunteers all around to ensure that over-entusiastic individuals do not kick up dust.
2. Team members, technicians, tuners, mechanics, helpers and 2nd drivers live for the timings of each run of their vehicles. The lack of display boards / screens showing the timing as soon as the run was over was a great damper. The best experience I have had in this regard was from APMSC / Spitfire in Hyderabad who SMSed the timing of the run as soon as it was over. The SMS would come in before the return from the finish line!
Ok, asking for a SMS might be too much but surely the drivers can be given timing slips or team-members can be given the information. If Ricky Gadson can be given that information - why not competitors?
3. I, as well as others in the sport are well aware that sponsors play a crucial part in keeping the sport alive and sponsors interests have to be protected but, not at the cost of competitors and competitive runs. Giving too much time for display / demo / exhibition runs and cutting down track time for competitors kills the sport, just in a different way.
4. All of us petrolheads love super-cars and super-bikes. Exotics and imports have us drooling. We love to see them perform on a track and we also love to see them just parked esp. at a weekend dedicated to cars and bikes. A friend who lives 800km away and wanted to participate and asked on Wed was told "if you were bringing a supercar, we would have made an exception. We cannot make an exception for a stock Indian car". While it is OK to become misty-eyed at the mere mention of a Super-car / Super-bike, is it OK to have different yardsticks, a different set of rules? Let us not even go near labels like "Apartheid", "Snobbish", "starry-eyed" etc. Let us just ask - "Is this the best way to encourage the sport?"
5. Track time is precious. It was galling to see the track empty for long periods of time. Events with a similar number of entries or more, have managed to do all their runs as well as give practice runs to ALL participants. If there were fewer entries all or some categories esp. classes like 'Unrestricted", "Open", "Pro-Stock" and "Forced-Induction" were given a second practice run. At Valley Run - Jan 2014, though the line-up and staging was done at a quick pace, the next classes were not called quickly enough into the 'holding area' for the pre-run scrutiny which translated into a huge time-lag between the runs of different categories esp. on Saturday. Besides being frustrating for participants, it is boring for spectators, it is no fun to stare at an empty track!
All Indian cars were scheduled to run on Saturday and finish their practice as well as Final runs on Saturday. Unfortunately, Indian cars did not get even one run on Saturday and ran only on Sunday (without any practice runs). If only track time was managed better, all of the runs scheduled for Saturday would have been completed on Saturday.
6. The level of communication from the organisers to competitors was pathetic to say the least. Indian cars were required to report for scrutiny by Saturday morning. No scrutiny took place at the appointed time(s). The organisers however made the effort of walking to each car and completing the scrutiny at the pits / paddock instead of calling the cars for scrutiny. That was a nice gesture and much appreciated by all competitors and crew.
After scrutiny was over, the drivers were left wondering when they would run. In the evening, as the Sun sank lower, some of the drivers went and asked the officials about the fate of the runs for the cars and were politely and apologetically told that cars would run only on the next day i.e. Sunday. Some of the car guys left immediately but others hung on waiting for an official announcement that never came and left only when the MC announced that the day's proceedings were closed.
Many participants had spent sleepless nights either preparing their cars or driving to the event from as much 900 kilometers away. Some had booked accommodation only till Saturday as they expected to finish their runs by Sat evening. A little announcement indicating which classes will run on that day and which will not would have helped competitors get some much needed rest.
7. Practice runs - these are critical and crucial for drivers / riders esp in categories that are not street legal. Even for classes like "Street-Stock" practice runs on the track are important for drivers to understand the Christmas tree, the track and to practice at least one launch, after all launching on public roads is not exactly desirable. After Saturday's fiasco, some of us were prescient enough to anticipate that practice runs for (Indian) cars would be cancelled. We were proved both correct and wrong. On Sunday drivers were told that "Practice Runs" were over for all categories of Indian Cars. Funnily, not one of the drivers were informed about the new schedule and that practice would be held early in the morning. No announcement was made before close of proceedings on Saturday, neither was a notice put up on the notice board. Not one of the drivers I met had received a SMS or e-mail informing them about the schedule for the practice runs (though the organisers/officials had both e-mail IDs as well as mobile numbers). Now, the rules and regulations do not guarantee a practice run and say participants MAY be given a practice run. That is perfectly acceptable. However, it is in the interest of the sport that participants be given a practice run. What is NOT acceptable is that the drivers are told that they missed the bus when the new schedule was not communicated to the drivers. No one would demur (or have cause for demur) if it was announced practice runs stand cancelled. Please do not try to shift the blame to the participants.
8. The Supplementary Regulations (SRs) were very clear and set out the parameters for every class, the permitted modifications & permutations. In fact they were pretty much the same as in other drag racing events, so most participants are well acquainted with the categories/classes. Unfortunately, the organisers / officials seemed to be unfamiliar about the SRs and this caused much confusion and heart-burn. A Gypsy running a different engine with a turbo in "Pro-Stock above 2050 cc" (B5) is a case in point, a Gypsy with a turbo engine does not fit within the definition / permitted modifications for the class and would rightly have gone into the "Forced Induction" class. Yes, it is possible for a car to run in Pro-Stock (with NOS disconnected), Forced Induction (Using NOS), Indian Open and Unrestricted.
9. For the competitors, it matters little in whose jurisdiction a particular matter lies. Whether it is IARC or Elite or N1 or Aamby, it really does not matter. As far as all 3rd parties are concerned (including participants, competitors and spectators) all the organisers are in it together as partners (in a JV) and passing the buck does nothing for the image of the team of organisers. If some of them are not members here or not following the thread, please inform them.
Yes, I know I have gone on for a long time but, it is not a rant. I write, not to complain or whine but in the genuine hope of helping keep the sport alive and having better events in the future.
Cheers, |